Work Plan - Final - Maricopa County Department of Transportation

More documents

Recommendations

Info

EPS QUALITY CONTROL FLOW CHARTSUB-CONSULTANT COORDINATION AND COMMUNICATIONEPS will contact its sub-consultants on a weekly basis to ensure that progress is being made according to theproject schedule. Sub-consultant reports will be subjected to the same QC review process described abovebefore they are submitted to MCDOT.TECHNICAL REVIEWWhere production reviews are for the verification of the accuracy and completeness of documents, atechnical review is for the assessment of the overall design concept of the project. A technical review willbe conducted by EPS, MCDOT and the Technical Advisory Committee. As a minimum, the technical reviewprocess should: Determine the adequacy of the process used to achieve the desired project goals Determine if all opportunities and constraints have been appropriately identified Determine if all viable alternatives have been considered Determine the practicality of the design concept Determine if legal and physical restraints were considered Determine if the design theory, concepts, and project layout are logical Determine if technical specifications are sufficiently comprehensive Determine the constructability of the selected designDOCUMENT CONTROLAll documents shall be filed in accordance with the standard departmental filing system (modified to eachproject’s scope). The engineer shall write the specific filing section on the document to be filed.All communications, whether written or verbal, that concern the Scope of Work, contract conditions,regulatory agency information, etc., should be documented. Documentation should include writtenEPS Group – Quality Assurance PlanHidden Waters Parkway CFS2
verification of verbal conversation, parties to the communication, when it was received, who conveyed it andwho received it. Specifically, communication should be handled in the following ways:All communication should be written and filed, including telephone logs.All written information entering or leaving the office should be copied to the Project Manager orDeputy Project Manager.Standard distribution lists should be developed for all communication.All calculations and design assumptions shall be documented and filed.One complete copy of each submittal should be filed, including plans, specifications, reports,estimates and calculations.Copies of all Client review comments shall be scanned and stored in the project electronic file.REVIEW CHECKLISTSProject documents shall be reviewed per the applicable checklists by the originator and the Project Engineer.Checklists used shall be Client specific and applicable to the project type. Project Managers may review thedocuments per the checklists but shall primarily determine compatibility with the project scope,compatibility to agreed design concepts, identify potential design conflicts, and assess constructability.Specific checklists for the Hidden Waters CFS documents per the scope of work are as follows:Work Plan□ Schedule,□ Study area boundary,□ Study purpose and objectives,□ Study process and approach used to meet objectives,□ Data collection plan,□ Design standards and guidelines,□ Stakeholder database,□ Key issues and challenges,□ Detailed study tasks,□ Criteria for the evaluation of alternatives,□ Scoping report summary,□ Written quality assurance/quality control planTechnical Memorandum #1 – Existing and Future Corridor Features□ Physical Features□ Existing Corridor Roadway Conditions□ Existing Approved Access Conditions and Policies/Guidelines□ Existing and Future Roadway Network Information□ Land Use, Jurisdictional Control, Ownership, and Management□ Relevant Plans, Reports, Guidelines, Studies and Standards□ Existing Topography/Mapping□ Identification of Special Interest AreasTechnical Memorandum #2 – Environmental Overview□ Cultural Resources□ Biology□ Land Use/Socioeconomic/Visual Quality□ Water QualityEPS Group – Quality Assurance PlanHidden Waters Parkway CFS3
Page 1 and 2:
Hidden Waters Parkway NorthCorridor
Page 3 and 4: AbbreviationsArizona Department of
Page 5 and 6: 2.0 Study Area Definition/Project U
Page 7 and 8: 3.0 Key IssuesThe intent of this st
Page 9 and 10: 3.2 DrainageThe Hidden Waters Corri
Page 11 and 12: 5.0 Study Process and ApproachThe H
Page 13 and 14: Figure 5-2 Project ScheduleHidden W
Page 15 and 16: Arizona Parkway Intersection/Interc
Page 17 and 18: 8.0 Criteria for Evaluation of Alte
Page 19 and 20: xHiddenWaters Parkway: Interstate 1
Page 21 and 22: xAttendeesHidden Waters Parkway: In
Page 23 and 24: x444AgendaHidden Waters Parkway:Int
Page 25 and 26: xHiddenProject GoalsWaters Parkway:
Page 27 and 28: xHiddenTechnical Advisory Committee
Page 29 and 30: x111Scope of WorkHidden Waters Park
Page 31 and 32: ContentsStudy Overview ............
Page 33 and 34: the first step in the development p
Page 35 and 36: • Topography from existing source
Page 37 and 38: Product: Technical Memorandum #2 -
Page 39 and 40: o CAP drainage studies that address
Page 41 and 42: 3.1. Technical Advisory Committee (
Page 43 and 44: o Douglas Rancho Toyota Proving Gro
Page 45 and 46: • Study Purpose/Need,• Study Go
Page 47 and 48: The Consultant will prepare the cor
Page 49 and 50: x222Project NotesProject Budget:$50
Page 51 and 52: Type First Name Last Name Title Com
Page 53: HIDDEN WATERS PARKWAY CFS: QUALITY
Page 57: □ Preferred Alignmento Standard c
show all

Work Plan - Final - Maricopa County Department of Transportation

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?