Work Plan - Final - Maricopa County Department of Transportation
Work Plan - Final - Maricopa County Department of Transportation Work Plan - Final - Maricopa County Department of Transportation
o Planning-level cost estimates,o Phasing Strategy/Implementation Plan,o Preferred Alignment Drawings,o Right of way needs,o Public Involvement Overview (provided by MCDOT).AppendicesThe following will be included as appendices of the final report:• Technical Memorandum #1 Existing and Future Corridor Features• Technical Memorandum #2 Environmental Overview• Technical Memorandum #3 Conceptual Drainage Report• Technical Memorandum #4 Candidate Alignments and Evaluation• Technical Memorandum #5 Preferred Alignment• Technical Memorandum #6 – Public and Stakeholder Participation• Summary of field reviews/meetingsThe Consultant will submit the Final Report in the following manner:• Draft Final Report: Upload to ftp site• Final Report and Appendices: Five copies, spiral bound, and 15 CD-ROMswith final report and appendices..Note: The entire report - including text, photos, drawings, tables, maps, appendicesand hand calculations -- shall be provided to MCDOT as one Acrobat Reader(.PDF) formatted file on a compact disk or DVD, suitable for publishing on theMCDOT website. The Consultant will prepare and consolidate project-related dataobtained or collected during the course of the project in GIS layers, the PreferredAlternative shape file shall be labeled “Preferred Alternative”.. Additionally, planswill be prepared in MicroStation (V8) format and be re-submitted separately fromthe entire report on a second compact disk or DVD. Digital photographs shall beprovided to MCDOT in electronic format. Electronic files shall be submitted oncompact disk, DVD, or 100 MB zip disks.5.4 Special Analysis Areas (Up to three areas)Candidate Alternatives may require options for detailing special analysis areas suchas future parkway/parkway and parkway/freeway connections, drainage crossings,alluvial fan crossings, or environmentally sensitive areas. These options will identifyissues, alternatives, potential benefits, and any potential fatal flaws. The specificscope and effort required for each special analysis are will be determined inconsultation with the MCDOT Project Manager.
x222Project NotesProject Budget:$500,000Hidden Waters Parkway: Interstate 10 to SR 74Corridor Feasibility Study - Project #TT005Project Schedule:12 monthsStudy Area:Douglas Ranch may not fit Hassayampa Framework Study purpose and need- There is a close proximity to the freeway- Belmont wouldn’t cooperate- Had to match jurisdictional linesEvaluation Criteria to include:- Functionality - MAG to define this criteria itemSite Visit with the team to include the environmental subconsultant to walk the siteMCDOT – to provide parcel data, etc., parks for northern portionFCDMC – Aerial mapping availableEPS – Research and get information from Section/Township, Developments, Buckeye,utilities (Blue Stake), i.e. Millennium Ranch. All available studies which impact thisstudy, include the McDowell StudyScheduleFinal Scope – 11/18/2010:- Scope of work- Fee scheduleNotice to Proceed – 2/2/2011RH & Associates, Inc.
- Page 1 and 2: Hidden Waters Parkway NorthCorridor
- Page 3 and 4: AbbreviationsArizona Department of
- Page 5 and 6: 2.0 Study Area Definition/Project U
- Page 7 and 8: 3.0 Key IssuesThe intent of this st
- Page 9 and 10: 3.2 DrainageThe Hidden Waters Corri
- Page 11 and 12: 5.0 Study Process and ApproachThe H
- Page 13 and 14: Figure 5-2 Project ScheduleHidden W
- Page 15 and 16: Arizona Parkway Intersection/Interc
- Page 17 and 18: 8.0 Criteria for Evaluation of Alte
- Page 19 and 20: xHiddenWaters Parkway: Interstate 1
- Page 21 and 22: xAttendeesHidden Waters Parkway: In
- Page 23 and 24: x444AgendaHidden Waters Parkway:Int
- Page 25 and 26: xHiddenProject GoalsWaters Parkway:
- Page 27 and 28: xHiddenTechnical Advisory Committee
- Page 29 and 30: x111Scope of WorkHidden Waters Park
- Page 31 and 32: ContentsStudy Overview ............
- Page 33 and 34: the first step in the development p
- Page 35 and 36: • Topography from existing source
- Page 37 and 38: Product: Technical Memorandum #2 -
- Page 39 and 40: o CAP drainage studies that address
- Page 41 and 42: 3.1. Technical Advisory Committee (
- Page 43 and 44: o Douglas Rancho Toyota Proving Gro
- Page 45 and 46: • Study Purpose/Need,• Study Go
- Page 47: The Consultant will prepare the cor
- Page 51 and 52: Type First Name Last Name Title Com
- Page 53 and 54: HIDDEN WATERS PARKWAY CFS: QUALITY
- Page 55 and 56: verification of verbal conversation
- Page 57: □ Preferred Alignmento Standard c
x222Project NotesProject Budget:$500,000Hidden Waters Parkway: Interstate 10 to SR 74Corridor Feasibility Study - Project #TT005Project Schedule:12 monthsStudy Area:Douglas Ranch may not fit Hassayampa Framework Study purpose and need- There is a close proximity to the freeway- Belmont wouldn’t cooperate- Had to match jurisdictional linesEvaluation Criteria to include:- Functionality - MAG to define this criteria itemSite Visit with the team to include the environmental subconsultant to walk the siteMCDOT – to provide parcel data, etc., parks for northern portionFCDMC – Aerial mapping availableEPS – Research and get information from Section/Township, Developments, Buckeye,utilities (Blue Stake), i.e. Millennium Ranch. All available studies which impact thisstudy, include the McDowell StudySchedule<strong>Final</strong> Scope – 11/18/2010:- Scope <strong>of</strong> work- Fee scheduleNotice to Proceed – 2/2/2011RH & Associates, Inc.
Change language