Work Plan - Final - Maricopa County Department of Transportation

More documents

Recommendations

Info

6.0 Relevant Studies and GuidelinesSeveral relevant transportation studies and design guideline documents will bereferenced throughout the course of the corridor feasibility study. Some of the studiesinclude the following:Interstate 10-Hassayampa Valley Roadway Framework Study, MAG, September2007o This study was completed to develop a recommended roadway networkthat will provide access throughout northwest Maricopa County andpreserve the interstate functionality of I-10.o This study identified the need for the Hidden Waters Parkway between I-10 and SR 74. Town of Buckeye General Plan, Town of Buckeye, January 2008.o The Town’s General Plan document is intended to serve as a blueprint fordevelopment within their community.o The Town’s General Plan makes recommendations for appropriate landuses within Town limits.Town of Buckeye Preliminary Transportation Master Plan, Town of Buckeye,December 2009.o (Progress on this document is ongoing.) This document supports theTown’s General Plan by defining the needed roadway network within theTown of Buckeye.Hassayampa Framework Study for the Wickenburg Area, MAG, ongoing.o This is an ongoing transportation framework study for the region north ofthe Interstate 10-Hassayampa Valley Roadway Framework Study.Interstate 8 and 10: Hidden Valley Transportation Framework Study, MAG, October2009o This study was completed to develop a recommended roadway networkthat will provide access throughout southwest Maricopa County andpreserve the interstate functionality of I-10. The study area extends fromthe Gila Mountains to Casa Grande, generally between I10 and I8.There are also several design guidelines that will be referenced throughout the courseof the study.Design Guideline Recommendations for the Arizona Parkway, MCDOT, August2008o This document identifies various elements necessary to design an ArizonaParkway such as; cross-section features, design speed, vehicles, accessmanagement and other geometric design standards.Hidden WatersFinal Work PlanCorridor Feasibility Study April, 2011Maricopa County Department of Transportation 11 EPS Job No. 10-092
Arizona Parkway Intersection/Interchange Operational Analysis and DesignConcepts Study, MCDOT, August 2009.o This study analyzed different parkway intersection geometrics and makesrecommendations for the appropriate type of intersections throughout theentire Hassayampa Valley Roadway Framework study area. Freeway to Parkway Interchange Template, ADOT, October 2010. MCDOT Roadway Design Manual, Revised April 2004, MCDOT, April 2004.o This document details the standardized roadway design guidelines thatare to be used within Maricopa County.Hidden WatersFinal Work PlanCorridor Feasibility Study April, 2011Maricopa County Department of Transportation 12 EPS Job No. 10-092
Page 1 and 2: Hidden Waters Parkway NorthCorridor
Page 3 and 4: AbbreviationsArizona Department of
Page 5 and 6: 2.0 Study Area Definition/Project U
Page 7 and 8: 3.0 Key IssuesThe intent of this st
Page 9 and 10: 3.2 DrainageThe Hidden Waters Corri
Page 11 and 12: 5.0 Study Process and ApproachThe H
Page 13: Figure 5-2 Project ScheduleHidden W
Page 17 and 18: 8.0 Criteria for Evaluation of Alte
Page 19 and 20: xHiddenWaters Parkway: Interstate 1
Page 21 and 22: xAttendeesHidden Waters Parkway: In
Page 23 and 24: x444AgendaHidden Waters Parkway:Int
Page 25 and 26: xHiddenProject GoalsWaters Parkway:
Page 27 and 28: xHiddenTechnical Advisory Committee
Page 29 and 30: x111Scope of WorkHidden Waters Park
Page 31 and 32: ContentsStudy Overview ............
Page 33 and 34: the first step in the development p
Page 35 and 36: • Topography from existing source
Page 37 and 38: Product: Technical Memorandum #2 -
Page 39 and 40: o CAP drainage studies that address
Page 41 and 42: 3.1. Technical Advisory Committee (
Page 43 and 44: o Douglas Rancho Toyota Proving Gro
Page 45 and 46: • Study Purpose/Need,• Study Go
Page 47 and 48: The Consultant will prepare the cor
Page 49 and 50: x222Project NotesProject Budget:$50
Page 51 and 52: Type First Name Last Name Title Com
Page 53 and 54: HIDDEN WATERS PARKWAY CFS: QUALITY
Page 55 and 56: verification of verbal conversation
Page 57: □ Preferred Alignmento Standard c

Work Plan - Final - Maricopa County Department of Transportation

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?