Work Plan - Final - Maricopa County Department of Transportation
Work Plan - Final - Maricopa County Department of Transportation Work Plan - Final - Maricopa County Department of Transportation
5.1 Data Collection PlanThis study will utilize existing documentation and relevant studies to identify potentialopportunities and constraints within the study area. GIS data, including recent aerialimagery, has been requested from the Flood Control District of Maricopa County(FCDMC) and MAG. The Hassayampa Valley Roadway Framework Study, AZ parkwaydesign guidelines, and other applicable studies will be obtained from MAG and MCDOT.Copies of the Town of Buckeye General Plan and Draft Transportation Master Plan willbe obtained from the Town of Buckeye. Existing utility providers within the study areawill be identified by contacting AZ Blue-Stake. Developer Stakeholders (El DoradoHoldings, LKY Development, Harvard Investments, etc.) will be contacted directly forcopies of their most recent development master plan circulation elements. will beconsulted for relevant, adjacent corridor feasibility studies. Maricopa Planning andDevelopment and the Town of Buckeye will be contacted for the most recent landentitlements.5.2 Future Technical MemorandumsThis work plan will be followed by six additional technical memorandums.Technical Memorandum No. 1 – Existing and Future Corridor FeaturesTechnical Memorandum No. 2 – Environmental OverviewTechnical Memorandum No. 3 – Conceptual Drainage ReportTechnical Memorandum No. 4 – Candidate Alternatives and EvaluationTechnical Memorandum No. 5 – Preferred AlignmentTechnical Memorandum No. 6 – Public and Stakeholder ParticipationThese memoranda will address the topics illustrated in Figure 5-1 as the studyprogresses. At the end of this corridor feasibility study, the findings of each technicalmemo will be summarized in a final report.5.3 Quality ControlAll of the described technical memorandum as well as the final feasibility study will besubject to EPS’s written quality control plan (see Appendix C).5.4 Project ScheduleFigure 5-2 presents a project schedule for the Hidden Waters Parkway North CorridorFeasibility Study. The study is scheduled to be completed January 31, 2012,approximately one year from the notice to proceed.Hidden WatersFinal Work PlanCorridor Feasibility Study April, 2011Maricopa County Department of Transportation 9 EPS Job No. 10-092
Figure 5-2 Project ScheduleHidden WatersFinal Work PlanCorridor Feasibility Study April, 2011Maricopa County Department of Transportation 10 EPS Job No. 10-092
- Page 1 and 2: Hidden Waters Parkway NorthCorridor
- Page 3 and 4: AbbreviationsArizona Department of
- Page 5 and 6: 2.0 Study Area Definition/Project U
- Page 7 and 8: 3.0 Key IssuesThe intent of this st
- Page 9 and 10: 3.2 DrainageThe Hidden Waters Corri
- Page 11: 5.0 Study Process and ApproachThe H
- Page 15 and 16: Arizona Parkway Intersection/Interc
- Page 17 and 18: 8.0 Criteria for Evaluation of Alte
- Page 19 and 20: xHiddenWaters Parkway: Interstate 1
- Page 21 and 22: xAttendeesHidden Waters Parkway: In
- Page 23 and 24: x444AgendaHidden Waters Parkway:Int
- Page 25 and 26: xHiddenProject GoalsWaters Parkway:
- Page 27 and 28: xHiddenTechnical Advisory Committee
- Page 29 and 30: x111Scope of WorkHidden Waters Park
- Page 31 and 32: ContentsStudy Overview ............
- Page 33 and 34: the first step in the development p
- Page 35 and 36: • Topography from existing source
- Page 37 and 38: Product: Technical Memorandum #2 -
- Page 39 and 40: o CAP drainage studies that address
- Page 41 and 42: 3.1. Technical Advisory Committee (
- Page 43 and 44: o Douglas Rancho Toyota Proving Gro
- Page 45 and 46: • Study Purpose/Need,• Study Go
- Page 47 and 48: The Consultant will prepare the cor
- Page 49 and 50: x222Project NotesProject Budget:$50
- Page 51 and 52: Type First Name Last Name Title Com
- Page 53 and 54: HIDDEN WATERS PARKWAY CFS: QUALITY
- Page 55 and 56: verification of verbal conversation
- Page 57: □ Preferred Alignmento Standard c
5.1 Data Collection <strong>Plan</strong>This study will utilize existing documentation and relevant studies to identify potentialopportunities and constraints within the study area. GIS data, including recent aerialimagery, has been requested from the Flood Control District <strong>of</strong> <strong>Maricopa</strong> <strong>County</strong>(FCDMC) and MAG. The Hassayampa Valley Roadway Framework Study, AZ parkwaydesign guidelines, and other applicable studies will be obtained from MAG and MCDOT.Copies <strong>of</strong> the Town <strong>of</strong> Buckeye General <strong>Plan</strong> and Draft <strong>Transportation</strong> Master <strong>Plan</strong> willbe obtained from the Town <strong>of</strong> Buckeye. Existing utility providers within the study areawill be identified by contacting AZ Blue-Stake. Developer Stakeholders (El DoradoHoldings, LKY Development, Harvard Investments, etc.) will be contacted directly forcopies <strong>of</strong> their most recent development master plan circulation elements. will beconsulted for relevant, adjacent corridor feasibility studies. <strong>Maricopa</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>ning andDevelopment and the Town <strong>of</strong> Buckeye will be contacted for the most recent landentitlements.5.2 Future Technical MemorandumsThis work plan will be followed by six additional technical memorandums.Technical Memorandum No. 1 – Existing and Future Corridor FeaturesTechnical Memorandum No. 2 – Environmental OverviewTechnical Memorandum No. 3 – Conceptual Drainage ReportTechnical Memorandum No. 4 – Candidate Alternatives and EvaluationTechnical Memorandum No. 5 – Preferred AlignmentTechnical Memorandum No. 6 – Public and Stakeholder ParticipationThese memoranda will address the topics illustrated in Figure 5-1 as the studyprogresses. At the end <strong>of</strong> this corridor feasibility study, the findings <strong>of</strong> each technicalmemo will be summarized in a final report.5.3 Quality ControlAll <strong>of</strong> the described technical memorandum as well as the final feasibility study will besubject to EPS’s written quality control plan (see Appendix C).5.4 Project ScheduleFigure 5-2 presents a project schedule for the Hidden Waters Parkway North CorridorFeasibility Study. The study is scheduled to be completed January 31, 2012,approximately one year from the notice to proceed.Hidden Waters<strong>Final</strong> <strong>Work</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>Corridor Feasibility Study April, 2011<strong>Maricopa</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> 9 EPS Job No. 10-092
Change language