Cleveland Clinic Health System Obligated Group - FMSbonds.com

Cleveland Clinic Health System Obligated Group - FMSbonds.com Cleveland Clinic Health System Obligated Group - FMSbonds.com

09.07.2015 Views

judicial action by a federal or state agency or a private party. The most common areas of potential liability are jointactivities among providers with respect to payor contracting, medical staff credentialing, and use of a hospital’slocal market power for entry into related health care businesses. From time to time, an Obligated Issuer may beinvolved in joint contracting activity with other hospitals or providers. The precise degree to which this or similarjoint contracting activities may expose Obligated Issuers to antitrust risk from governmental or private sources isdependent on specific facts which may change from time to time. A U.S. Supreme Court decision now allowsphysicians who are subject to adverse peer review proceedings to file federal antitrust actions against hospitals.Hospitals regularly have disputes regarding credentialing and peer review, and therefore may be subject to liabilityin this area. In addition, hospitals occasionally indemnify medical staff members who are involved in suchcredentialing or peer review activities, and may also be liable with respect to such indemnity. Recent courtdecisions have also established private causes of action against hospitals which use their local market power topromote ancillary health care business in which they have an interest. Such activities may result in monetaryliability for the participating hospitals under certain circumstances where a competitor suffers business damage.Government or private parties are entitled to challenge joint ventures that may injure competition. Liability in anyof these or other antitrust areas of liability may be substantial, depending on the facts and circumstances of eachcase, and may have a material adverse impact on the Obligated Issuers.Nationwide Nursing ShortageHealth care providers depend on qualified nurses to provide quality service to patients. There is currently anationwide shortage of qualified nurses. This shortage and the more stressful working conditions it creates for thoseremaining in the profession are increasingly viewed as a threat to patient safety and may trigger the adoption of stateand federal laws and regulations intended to reduce that risk. For example, some states are considering legislationthat would prohibit forced overtime for nurses. In response to the shortage of qualified nurses, health care providershave increased and could continue to increase wages and benefits to recruit or retain nurses and have had to hiremore expensive contract nurses. The shortage could also limit the operations of health care providers by limiting thenumber of patient beds available. Management of the Cleveland Clinic believes that the Obligated Issuers currentlyemploy an adequate number and type of nurses at each of the Obligated Issuers’ hospitals. However, the ObligatedIssuers have experienced increased volume growth which, in combination with the nursing shortage, may require theObligated Issuers to increase wages and benefits to recruit and retain nurses or to engage expensive contract nursesin the future to meet increased demands for nurses. No assurance can be given that the nursing shortage or theincreased costs related thereto will not have a material adverse effect on the future operations or financial conditionof the Obligated Issuers.EmployeesThe ability of the Obligated Issuers to employ and retain qualified employees, and their ability to maintaingood relations with such employees and the unions they may be represented by, affect the quality of services topatients and the financial condition of the Obligated Issuers. For a discussion of the employees of the ObligatedGroup, existing union relationships and the Obligated Group’s relationship with its employees, see the discussionunder the caption “PART II. THE OBLIGATED GROUP — G. EMPLOYEES” in APPENDIX A hereto.InvestmentsDuring certain fiscal years, investment income has constituted a significant portion of the net income of theObligated Group. No assurance can be given that the investments of the Obligated Issuers will produce positivereturns or that losses on investments will not occur in the future.To the extent investment returns are lower than anticipated or losses on investments occur, the ObligatedIssuers may also be required to made additional deposits in connection with pension fund liabilities.Environmental Laws and RegulationsHealth care providers are subject to a wide variety of federal, state and local environmental andoccupational health and safety laws and regulations which address, among other things, hospital operations, facilities44

and properties owned or operated by hospitals. Among the types of regulatory requirements faced by hospitals are(a) air and water quality control requirements, (b) waste management requirements, (c) specific regulatoryrequirements applicable to asbestos, polychlorinated biphenyls and radioactive substances, (d) requirements forproviding notice to employees and members of the public about hazardous materials handled by or located at thehospital, and (e) requirements for training employees in the proper handling and management of hazardous materialsand wastes.In its role as an owner and operator of properties or facilities, each Obligated Issuer may be subject toliability for investigating and remedying any hazardous substances that may be present on or have migrated off of itsproperty or facilities. Typical hospital operations include, but are not limited to, in various combinations, thehandling, use, storage, transportation, disposal and discharge of hazardous, infectious, toxic, radioactive, flammableand other hazardous materials, wastes, pollutants or contaminants. As such, hospital operations are particularlysusceptible to the practical, financial and legal risks associated with compliance with such laws and regulations.Such risks may result from damage to individuals, property or the environment and include an interruption ofoperations, an increase in operating costs, legal liability, damages, injunctions or fines and investigations,administrative proceedings, penalties or other governmental agency actions. The Obligated Issuers expect tocontinue to encounter such risks in the future, and exposure to such risks could materially adversely affect the futurefinancial condition or results of operations of individual Obligated Issuers and of the Obligated Group, taken as awhole.Management of the Cleveland Clinic is not aware of any pending or threatened claim, investigation orenforcement action regarding such environmental issues involving any Obligated Issuer which, if determinedadversely, would have a material adverse effect on the future financial condition or results of operations of theObligated Issuers, taken as a whole.The Master Trustee or the Bond Trustee may decline to enforce the Master Trust Indenture or the BondIndenture, as the case may be, if the related trustee has not been indemnified to its satisfaction, in accordance withits Indenture, for all liabilities it may incur as a consequence thereof. Such liabilities may include, but are notlimited to, costs associated with complying with environmental laws and regulations.Increased Enforcement Affecting Clinical ResearchIn addition to increasing enforcement of laws governing payment and reimbursement, the federalgovernment has also stepped up enforcement of laws and regulations governing the conduct of clinical trials athospitals. DHHS elevated and strengthened its Office of Human Research Protection, one of the agencies withresponsibilities for monitoring federally funded research. In addition, the National Institutes of Health significantlyincreased the number of facility inspections that these agencies perform. The Food and Drug Administration(“FDA”) also has authority over the conduct of clinical trials performed in hospitals when these trials are conductedon behalf of sponsors seeking FDA approval to market the drug or device that is the subject of the research. TheFDA’s inspection of facilities increased significantly in recent years. These agencies’ enforcement powers rangefrom substantial fines and penalties to exclusions of researchers and suspension or termination of entire researchprograms. Management of the Cleveland Clinic believes that clinical research being conducted by any of theObligated Issuers is in substantial compliance with material applicable requirements, but no assurance can be madethat the FDA will not take a contrary position and that such position will not have a material adverse effect on thefuture operations or financial condition of the Obligated Issuers.Technological ChangesMedical research and resulting discoveries have grown exponentially in the last decade. These newdiscoveries may add greatly to the Obligated Issuers’ cost of providing services with no or little offsetting increasein federal reimbursement and may also render obsolete certain of the Obligated Issuers’ health services. New drugsand devices may increase hospitals’ expense because, for the most part, the costs of new drugs and devices are nottypically accounted for in the DRG payment received by hospitals for inpatient care. The PPS system imposed onoutpatient services does permit a direct pass-through of certain new technologies defined by the government.45

and properties owned or operated by hospitals. Among the types of regulatory requirements faced by hospitals are(a) air and water quality control requirements, (b) waste management requirements, (c) specific regulatoryrequirements applicable to asbestos, polychlorinated biphenyls and radioactive substances, (d) requirements forproviding notice to employees and members of the public about hazardous materials handled by or located at thehospital, and (e) requirements for training employees in the proper handling and management of hazardous materialsand wastes.In its role as an owner and operator of properties or facilities, each <strong>Obligated</strong> Issuer may be subject toliability for investigating and remedying any hazardous substances that may be present on or have migrated off of itsproperty or facilities. Typical hospital operations include, but are not limited to, in various <strong>com</strong>binations, thehandling, use, storage, transportation, disposal and discharge of hazardous, infectious, toxic, radioactive, flammableand other hazardous materials, wastes, pollutants or contaminants. As such, hospital operations are particularlysusceptible to the practical, financial and legal risks associated with <strong>com</strong>pliance with such laws and regulations.Such risks may result from damage to individuals, property or the environment and include an interruption ofoperations, an increase in operating costs, legal liability, damages, injunctions or fines and investigations,administrative proceedings, penalties or other governmental agency actions. The <strong>Obligated</strong> Issuers expect tocontinue to encounter such risks in the future, and exposure to such risks could materially adversely affect the futurefinancial condition or results of operations of individual <strong>Obligated</strong> Issuers and of the <strong>Obligated</strong> <strong>Group</strong>, taken as awhole.Management of the <strong>Cleveland</strong> <strong>Clinic</strong> is not aware of any pending or threatened claim, investigation orenforcement action regarding such environmental issues involving any <strong>Obligated</strong> Issuer which, if determinedadversely, would have a material adverse effect on the future financial condition or results of operations of the<strong>Obligated</strong> Issuers, taken as a whole.The Master Trustee or the Bond Trustee may decline to enforce the Master Trust Indenture or the BondIndenture, as the case may be, if the related trustee has not been indemnified to its satisfaction, in accordance withits Indenture, for all liabilities it may incur as a consequence thereof. Such liabilities may include, but are notlimited to, costs associated with <strong>com</strong>plying with environmental laws and regulations.Increased Enforcement Affecting <strong>Clinic</strong>al ResearchIn addition to increasing enforcement of laws governing payment and reimbursement, the federalgovernment has also stepped up enforcement of laws and regulations governing the conduct of clinical trials athospitals. DHHS elevated and strengthened its Office of Human Research Protection, one of the agencies withresponsibilities for monitoring federally funded research. In addition, the National Institutes of <strong>Health</strong> significantlyincreased the number of facility inspections that these agencies perform. The Food and Drug Administration(“FDA”) also has authority over the conduct of clinical trials performed in hospitals when these trials are conductedon behalf of sponsors seeking FDA approval to market the drug or device that is the subject of the research. TheFDA’s inspection of facilities increased significantly in recent years. These agencies’ enforcement powers rangefrom substantial fines and penalties to exclusions of researchers and suspension or termination of entire researchprograms. Management of the <strong>Cleveland</strong> <strong>Clinic</strong> believes that clinical research being conducted by any of the<strong>Obligated</strong> Issuers is in substantial <strong>com</strong>pliance with material applicable requirements, but no assurance can be madethat the FDA will not take a contrary position and that such position will not have a material adverse effect on thefuture operations or financial condition of the <strong>Obligated</strong> Issuers.Technological ChangesMedical research and resulting discoveries have grown exponentially in the last decade. These newdiscoveries may add greatly to the <strong>Obligated</strong> Issuers’ cost of providing services with no or little offsetting increasein federal reimbursement and may also render obsolete certain of the <strong>Obligated</strong> Issuers’ health services. New drugsand devices may increase hospitals’ expense because, for the most part, the costs of new drugs and devices are nottypically accounted for in the DRG payment received by hospitals for inpatient care. The PPS system imposed onoutpatient services does permit a direct pass-through of certain new technologies defined by the government.45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!