Cleveland Clinic Health System Obligated Group - FMSbonds.com
Cleveland Clinic Health System Obligated Group - FMSbonds.com Cleveland Clinic Health System Obligated Group - FMSbonds.com
SGR system annually takes into account changes in the Medicare fee-for-services enrollment, input prices, spendingdue to law and regulation, and gross domestic product, effectively changing the RBRVS on an annual basis. Thereis no guarantee that reimbursement under RBRVS will cover the Obligated Group’s actual costs of providingphysician services to Medicare beneficiaries.Payments to physicians who opt not to participate in Medicare are paid by Medicare at lower levels thanpayments to participating physicians. Regardless of physician enrollment status, all physicians who furnish healthcare services to Medicare beneficiaries must meet the full gamut of federal coding, documentation and othercompliance requirements. In general, the professional staff members of the Obligated Group are participatingphysicians in the Medicare program.Hospice PaymentsHospice services are paid on a cost-based prospective payment method, subject to a “cap” amount. CMSestablishes daily payment amounts, which are adjusted to reflect local differences in wages, to reimburse fourcategories of covered hospice care: routine home care; continuous home care; inpatient respite care; and generalinpatient care. Under the BBA and BBRA, the amount paid for hospice services will be less than the market basketincrease for the fiscal year involved. Payments to a hospice for general inpatient care are subject to a limitation onthe number of days of inpatient care furnished to Medicare patients. During the 12-month period beginningNovember 1 of each year and ending October 31, the aggregate number of inpatient days (both for general inpatientcare and inpatient respite care) may not exceed 20 percent of the aggregate total number of days of hospice careprovided to all Medicare beneficiaries during that same period. This limitation is applied once each year, at the endof the hospices’ “cap period” (November 1 to October 31).Outpatient Renal Dialysis PaymentsRenal dialysis services are reimbursed on the basis of a prospective payment amount, although differentrates are paid for hospital-based and freestanding facilities, and are adjusted for geographic differences in laborcosts. In an effort to provide an incentive for home dialysis, the composite rate is the same regardless of whether thetreatment is furnished in the facility or in the patient’s home and must be accepted by the facility as payment in fullfor covered outpatient dialysis. There can be no assurance that the amount received by the Obligated Issuers forthese services will be sufficient to cover their costs to provide these services.Provider-Based StandardsThe Medicare program pays certain facilities and services, including, for example, SNFs and physicianoffices and clinics, differently depending upon whether they are “provider based” or “freestanding.” A “providerbased” facility or service is an integral part of another provider, such as a hospital. Certain administrative costs andoverhead of the provider organization may or must be allocated in part to the provider-based entity. In addition,provider-based designation can result in additional Medicare payments for services furnished at the provider-basedlocation and also may increase the co-insurance liability of Medicare beneficiaries for those services.“Freestanding” providers are not considered part of another provider under the Medicare program and stand on theirown for purposes of Medicare payments. For any given facility or service, it is probable that classification as“provider based” will result in higher aggregate Medicare payments for a hospital system as a whole.Effective October 1, 2002, the mandatory requirement to obtain provider based designation was replacedwith a voluntary attestation process. Nevertheless, providers may elect to obtain a determination of provider basedstatus prior to billing in that manner, thereby eliminating the risk of incorrect billing and reimbursement for servicesprovided to Medicare beneficiaries. Management of the Obligated Issuers believes that all facilities or services,which currently are or have been treated as provider-based, met and continue to meet all applicable criteria for suchdesignation. However, should a determination be made to the contrary, reclassification of entities now characterizedas “provider-based” to “freestanding” may adversely affect those entities’ payments under the Medicare Programand could make them liable for Medicare overpayments.26
Medicare Conditions of ParticipationHospitals must comply with standards called “Conditions of Participation” in order to be eligible forMedicare and Medicaid reimbursement. CMS is responsible for ensuring that hospitals meet these regulatoryConditions of Participation. Under the Medicare rules, hospitals accredited by The Joint Commission (“JCAHO”)are deemed to meet the Conditions of Participation. However, CMS may request that the state agency responsiblefor approving hospitals on behalf of CMS, conduct a “sample validation survey” of a hospital to determine whetherit is complying with the Conditions of Participation. Failure to maintain JCAHO accreditation or to otherwisecomply with the Conditions of Participation could have a material adverse effect on the continued participation inthe Medicare and Medicaid programs, and ultimately, the financial condition and results of operations of theObligated Issuers.Medicare Audits and WithholdsHospitals participating in Medicare and Medicaid are subject to audits and retroactive audit adjustmentswith respect to reimbursement claimed under those programs, and the representations upon which suchreimbursements are claimed. Although management of the Obligated Issuers believes its reserves are adequate forthe purpose, any such future adjustments could be material. Both Medicare and Medicaid regulations also providefor withholding payments in certain circumstances. Any such withholding with respect to any Obligated Issuercould have a material adverse effect on the financial condition and results of operations of the Obligated Issuers. Inaddition, contracts between hospitals and third-party payors often have contractual audit, setoff and withholdlanguage that may cause substantial, retroactive adjustments. Such contractual adjustments also could have amaterial adverse effect on the financial condition and results of operations of the Obligated Issuers. The ObligatedIssuers are not aware of any situation in which a Medicare or other payment is being, or may in the future be,withheld that would materially and adversely affect the financial condition or results of operations of the ObligatedIssuers.Under both Medicare and Medicaid programs, certain health care providers, including hospitals, arerequired to report certain financial information on a periodic basis, and with respect to certain types ofclassifications of information, penalties are imposed for inaccurate reports. As these requirements are numerous,technical and complex, there can be no assurance that the Obligated Issuers will avoid incurring such penalties in thefuture. These penalties may be material and could include criminal, civil or administrative liability for making falseclaims and/or exclusion from participation in the federal healthcare programs. Under certain circumstances,payments made may be determined to have been made as a consequence of improper claims subject to the federalFalse Claims Act or other federal statutes, subjecting the provider to civil or criminal sanctions. The United StatesDepartment of Justice has initiated a number of national investigations, including in the State of Ohio and the Stateof Florida, involving proceedings under the federal False Claims Act relating to alleged improper billing practicesby hospitals. These actions have resulted in substantial settlement amounts being paid in certain cases.Management of the Cleveland Clinic does not anticipate that Medicare audits or cost report settlements forthe Medicare program will materially adversely affect the financial condition or results of operations of theObligated Issuers, taken as a whole; however, in light of the complexity of the regulations relating to the Medicareprogram, and the threat of ongoing investigations as described above, there can be no assurance that significantdifficulties will not develop in the future.Recent LegislationThe Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (the “2003 Act”), inaddition to adding outpatient prescription drug coverage, made significant changes to the Medicare programaffecting hospitals, and provides certain economic benefits to hospitals over the 10 years from its effective date.Among other things, the 2003 Act’s hospital-related provisions (i) increase payments to rural providers; (ii) ensurethat inpatient PPS payment updates remain at the full market basket, provided hospitals participate in a voluntaryCMS-sponsored hospital reporting initiative; (iii) increase home health payments; and (iv) establish a competitiveacquisition program for durable medical equipment beginning in 2007.27
- Page 1 and 2: NEW ISSUEBOOK ENTRY ONLYSee “RATI
- Page 3 and 4: TABLE OF CONTENTSINTRODUCTORY STATE
- Page 5 and 6: OFFERING CIRCULARRelating to$452,34
- Page 7 and 8: Security and Sources of Payment for
- Page 9 and 10: Upon issuance of the Series 2008A B
- Page 11 and 12: (ii) acquisition of magnetic resona
- Page 13 and 14: $147,200,000 Term Bonds Due January
- Page 15 and 16: that the redemption is conditional
- Page 17 and 18: Use of Certain Terms in Other Secti
- Page 19 and 20: County BondsThe Cleveland Clinic an
- Page 21 and 22: The Cleveland Clinic regularly revi
- Page 23 and 24: ESTIMATED SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS
- Page 25 and 26: DEBT SERVICE COVERAGEThe following
- Page 27 and 28: MedicareGeneralApproximately 29% of
- Page 29: there is no assurance that the Obli
- Page 33 and 34: fiscal year’s budget that are in
- Page 35 and 36: Federal Regulatory and Contractual
- Page 37 and 38: Stark-type statutes have fewer exce
- Page 39 and 40: party or for any services rendered
- Page 41 and 42: typically in a position to refer pa
- Page 43 and 44: OhioOhio Certificate of Need Progra
- Page 45 and 46: performance demonstration programs
- Page 47 and 48: manifest injustice would otherwise
- Page 49 and 50: and properties owned or operated by
- Page 51 and 52: plan of reorganization, with one ex
- Page 53 and 54: percentage may be composed wholly o
- Page 55 and 56: The Internal Revenue Service Form 9
- Page 57 and 58: Charity Care, Underinsured and Unin
- Page 59 and 60: • Proposals to eliminate the tax-
- Page 61 and 62: acting in the capacity of underwrit
- Page 63 and 64: Frederick R. Nance, Regional Managi
- Page 65 and 66: FINANCIAL POSITION — D. BALANCE S
- Page 67 and 68: The CommissionBecause the Series 20
- Page 69 and 70: APPENDIX ACLEVELAND CLINIC HEALTH S
- Page 71 and 72: TABLE OF CONTENTSPageINTRODUCTION .
- Page 73 and 74: This Appendix to the Offering Circu
- Page 75 and 76: A. ORIGINS AND FUNDAMENTAL MISSIONT
- Page 77 and 78: C. GOVERNANCE OF THE CLEVELAND CLIN
- Page 79 and 80: Voting Members of theBoard of Trust
Medicare Conditions of ParticipationHospitals must <strong>com</strong>ply with standards called “Conditions of Participation” in order to be eligible forMedicare and Medicaid reimbursement. CMS is responsible for ensuring that hospitals meet these regulatoryConditions of Participation. Under the Medicare rules, hospitals accredited by The Joint Commission (“JCAHO”)are deemed to meet the Conditions of Participation. However, CMS may request that the state agency responsiblefor approving hospitals on behalf of CMS, conduct a “sample validation survey” of a hospital to determine whetherit is <strong>com</strong>plying with the Conditions of Participation. Failure to maintain JCAHO accreditation or to otherwise<strong>com</strong>ply with the Conditions of Participation could have a material adverse effect on the continued participation inthe Medicare and Medicaid programs, and ultimately, the financial condition and results of operations of the<strong>Obligated</strong> Issuers.Medicare Audits and WithholdsHospitals participating in Medicare and Medicaid are subject to audits and retroactive audit adjustmentswith respect to reimbursement claimed under those programs, and the representations upon which suchreimbursements are claimed. Although management of the <strong>Obligated</strong> Issuers believes its reserves are adequate forthe purpose, any such future adjustments could be material. Both Medicare and Medicaid regulations also providefor withholding payments in certain circumstances. Any such withholding with respect to any <strong>Obligated</strong> Issuercould have a material adverse effect on the financial condition and results of operations of the <strong>Obligated</strong> Issuers. Inaddition, contracts between hospitals and third-party payors often have contractual audit, setoff and withholdlanguage that may cause substantial, retroactive adjustments. Such contractual adjustments also could have amaterial adverse effect on the financial condition and results of operations of the <strong>Obligated</strong> Issuers. The <strong>Obligated</strong>Issuers are not aware of any situation in which a Medicare or other payment is being, or may in the future be,withheld that would materially and adversely affect the financial condition or results of operations of the <strong>Obligated</strong>Issuers.Under both Medicare and Medicaid programs, certain health care providers, including hospitals, arerequired to report certain financial information on a periodic basis, and with respect to certain types ofclassifications of information, penalties are imposed for inaccurate reports. As these requirements are numerous,technical and <strong>com</strong>plex, there can be no assurance that the <strong>Obligated</strong> Issuers will avoid incurring such penalties in thefuture. These penalties may be material and could include criminal, civil or administrative liability for making falseclaims and/or exclusion from participation in the federal healthcare programs. Under certain circumstances,payments made may be determined to have been made as a consequence of improper claims subject to the federalFalse Claims Act or other federal statutes, subjecting the provider to civil or criminal sanctions. The United StatesDepartment of Justice has initiated a number of national investigations, including in the State of Ohio and the Stateof Florida, involving proceedings under the federal False Claims Act relating to alleged improper billing practicesby hospitals. These actions have resulted in substantial settlement amounts being paid in certain cases.Management of the <strong>Cleveland</strong> <strong>Clinic</strong> does not anticipate that Medicare audits or cost report settlements forthe Medicare program will materially adversely affect the financial condition or results of operations of the<strong>Obligated</strong> Issuers, taken as a whole; however, in light of the <strong>com</strong>plexity of the regulations relating to the Medicareprogram, and the threat of ongoing investigations as described above, there can be no assurance that significantdifficulties will not develop in the future.Recent LegislationThe Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (the “2003 Act”), inaddition to adding outpatient prescription drug coverage, made significant changes to the Medicare programaffecting hospitals, and provides certain economic benefits to hospitals over the 10 years from its effective date.Among other things, the 2003 Act’s hospital-related provisions (i) increase payments to rural providers; (ii) ensurethat inpatient PPS payment updates remain at the full market basket, provided hospitals participate in a voluntaryCMS-sponsored hospital reporting initiative; (iii) increase home health payments; and (iv) establish a <strong>com</strong>petitiveacquisition program for durable medical equipment beginning in 2007.27