Language Faculty, Complexity Reduction and Symmetry Break<strong>in</strong>gAnna Maria Di Sciullo, Université du Québec à Montréal1. I assume that <strong>the</strong> Language Faculty is stable, it does not vary though time and space, and thatlanguage development requires experience (Chomsky 1995, 2005, 2011). I develop <strong>the</strong> view thatlanguage evolutionary development is <strong>the</strong> result of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>teraction of <strong>the</strong> language faculty +experience with factors reduc<strong>in</strong>g complexity (Third Factor).2. The relation between <strong>the</strong> language faculty and pr<strong>in</strong>ciples reduc<strong>in</strong>g complexity has been part of<strong>the</strong> research agenda <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> generative enterprise s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> 50’s. Framed with<strong>in</strong> Biol<strong>in</strong>guistics, <strong>the</strong>pr<strong>in</strong>ciples of efficient computation can be thought of as be<strong>in</strong>g natural laws affect<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>computations of <strong>the</strong> Language Faculty (No Tamper<strong>in</strong>g Condition, Derivation by Phase, M<strong>in</strong>imalSearch, Pronounce <strong>the</strong> M<strong>in</strong>imum, a.o.). O<strong>the</strong>r complexity-reduc<strong>in</strong>g factors <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>the</strong> mechanismsrestrict<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> set of possible acquirable grammars (Yang 2002, Niyogi 2006, Niyogi and Berwick2009). Yet o<strong>the</strong>r such factors may come from natural processes, such as symmetry break<strong>in</strong>g (DiSciullo 2011, 2012). Symmetry break<strong>in</strong>g is a process that br<strong>in</strong>gs a system from a symmetric state(∀a,b ∈ X, aRb ⇒bRa) to an asymmetric state (∀a,b ∈ X, aRb ⇒¬bRa), and which has beenargued to affect syntactic derivations <strong>in</strong> Moro (2000).3. Several works <strong>in</strong> evolutionary developmental biology provide evidence that variation <strong>in</strong> biologyis symmetry break<strong>in</strong>g (Graham, Freeman and Emlen 1993; Lowent<strong>in</strong> 2000, 2006; Palmer 2004,2008; Palmer and Lowent<strong>in</strong> 2004). Symmetry break<strong>in</strong>g is part of <strong>the</strong> processes affect<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> shapeof biological organisms. Palmer identifies phylogenic patterns of variance <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> evolution ofbilateral asymmetric species. Namely, <strong>the</strong> fact that Fluctuat<strong>in</strong>g Asymmetry, i.e., <strong>the</strong> random left orright prom<strong>in</strong>ence, precedes Directional Asymmetry, i.e., <strong>the</strong> clear, exclusive left or rightprom<strong>in</strong>ence of bipartite organisms. This pattern of variance on <strong>the</strong> shape of biological organisms isan effect of external factors on <strong>the</strong>se organisms. Symmetry break<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> computationalprocedure of <strong>the</strong> language faculty may f<strong>in</strong>d its orig<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> natural processes affect<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>evolution of <strong>the</strong> shape of biological organisms. Seen as a natural process external to <strong>the</strong> LanguageFaculty, symmetry break<strong>in</strong>g may contribute to our understand<strong>in</strong>g of language development.4. A strik<strong>in</strong>g fact <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> development of <strong>the</strong> nom<strong>in</strong>al extended projection <strong>in</strong> Indo-Europeanlanguages is that while pre and post nom<strong>in</strong>al positions for a functional category are possible <strong>in</strong>earlier stages of <strong>the</strong> languages, only one position is available <strong>in</strong> later stages. This phenomenon isnei<strong>the</strong>r language specific nor category specific, as it can be observed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> development ofprepositions <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Indo-European languages, <strong>the</strong> def<strong>in</strong>ite determ<strong>in</strong>er from <strong>Old</strong> to ModernRomanian, <strong>the</strong> possessive adjectives from Ancient to Modern Greek and from Lat<strong>in</strong> to <strong>the</strong>Romance languages. I raise <strong>the</strong> question of why this is <strong>the</strong> case.5. I argue that this phenomenon is <strong>the</strong> consequence of <strong>the</strong> Head Initial/F<strong>in</strong>al Constra<strong>in</strong>t, (1), whichI propose to be an evolutionary developmental universal.(1) The Head Initial⁄F<strong>in</strong>al Constra<strong>in</strong>t (HI/FC)The choice between <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>itial and <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>al position for a functionalhead <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> same extended projection is elim<strong>in</strong>ated <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> evolution of languages.The HI/FC is an <strong>in</strong>stance of <strong>the</strong> Directional Asymmetry pr<strong>in</strong>ciple, (2), that may f<strong>in</strong>d its source <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> biological evolutionary development of bipartite organisms where <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g historicalevolutionary path is observed: fluctuat<strong>in</strong>g asymmetry > directional asymmetry. In <strong>the</strong> fluctuat<strong>in</strong>gasymmetry stage ei<strong>the</strong>r one or <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r side of a bipartite organism can be prom<strong>in</strong>ent, whereas <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> directional asymmetry stage, only one is.(2) Directional Asymmetry (DA)Language evolutionary development is symmetry break<strong>in</strong>g.While <strong>the</strong>re is noth<strong>in</strong>g like language, language rema<strong>in</strong>s an object of <strong>the</strong> natural world, and thus, itis subject to natural processes. Draw<strong>in</strong>g a parallel with functional projections, it is possible to
associate <strong>the</strong> fluctuat<strong>in</strong>g asymmetry stage to <strong>the</strong> stage where a complement may occur to <strong>the</strong> rightor to <strong>the</strong> left of a functional head, and <strong>the</strong> directional asymmetry stage to <strong>the</strong> stage where only <strong>the</strong>right or only <strong>the</strong> left position rema<strong>in</strong>s available.I discuss <strong>the</strong> prediction of <strong>the</strong> DA-HI/FC for Indo-European languages, focus<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>the</strong>order of <strong>the</strong> complements with respect to heads <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> extended nom<strong>in</strong>al doma<strong>in</strong>, and I show thatsuch evolutionary developmental constra<strong>in</strong>t contributes to <strong>the</strong> reduction of derivationalcomplexity, measured <strong>in</strong> terms of length of <strong>the</strong> derivations.6. The DA-HI/FC expresses a characteristic of languages as <strong>the</strong>y evolve through time. Suchuniversal is not coextensive with Greenberg’s (1966) absolute and implicational universals.Current works on language variation aim to derive language universals from more basic propertiesof <strong>the</strong> language faculty. The DA-HI/FC is an evolutionary developmental universal whosepredictions do not follow directly from cartographic (C<strong>in</strong>que 2005), antisymmetric (Kayne 2011),or o<strong>the</strong>r configurational constra<strong>in</strong>ts (Biberauer, Holmberg & Roberts 2010). However, it iscompatible with <strong>the</strong>se constra<strong>in</strong>ts.7. I discuss <strong>the</strong> case of languages where <strong>the</strong>re is no robust evidence for DA-HI/FC. For example,Turkish is by and large postpositional, as it is <strong>the</strong> case for o<strong>the</strong>r languages, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g F<strong>in</strong>nish,H<strong>in</strong>di, Korean, and Hungarian. I raise <strong>the</strong> question why this is <strong>the</strong> case. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Greenberg’suniversals no. 3 and no. 4, <strong>the</strong> availability of prepositions or postpositions is related to broadertypological properties, (3). SOV languages (Japanese, Mongolian, Basque, Turkish, Korean, a. o.)are postpositional and VSO languages (Welsh, Classical Arabic, Tagalog, a. o.) are prepositional.(3) a. Languages with dom<strong>in</strong>ant VSO order are always prepositional. (no. 3)b. With overwhelm<strong>in</strong>gly greater than chance frequency, languages with normal SOVorder are postpositional. (no. 4)I argue that <strong>the</strong> absence of prepositions <strong>in</strong> some languages, and <strong>the</strong> absence of postpositions <strong>in</strong>o<strong>the</strong>r languages can be derived from <strong>the</strong> properties of <strong>the</strong> computational system, given parallel(harmonic) functional projections cha<strong>in</strong>s, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g verbs (v) and prepositions (P), on <strong>the</strong> onehand, and differences <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> feature values of P, on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r. I also consider <strong>the</strong> case of languagessuch as Mandar<strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese, where prepositions and postpositions are observed through <strong>the</strong>language evolutionary development (Djamouri, Waltraud and Whitman 2011). I argue that adpositionsdid not evolve from different categories, but ra<strong>the</strong>r are an <strong>in</strong>stantiation of <strong>the</strong> path shellwith direction and location heads.8. It is generally assumed that locality conditions, such as Derivation by Phase and <strong>the</strong> M<strong>in</strong>imalSearch Condition limit computational complexity. Derivational complexity may also be reducedby <strong>the</strong> effect of evolutionary developmental processes on <strong>the</strong> generative procedure of <strong>the</strong> LanguageFaculty and <strong>the</strong> DA-HI/HF may f<strong>in</strong>d an explanation <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> natural development of biologicalsystems.References Biberauer, T., A. Holmberg, and I. Roberts. 2010. A Syntactic Universal and its Consequences. U. of Cambridge. | C<strong>in</strong>que, G. 2005.Deriv<strong>in</strong>g Greenberg’s Universal 20 and its exceptions. L<strong>in</strong>guistic Inquiry 36 3: 315–332. | Chomsky, N. 1995. The M<strong>in</strong>imalist Program. CambridgeMass: MIT Press. | Chomsky, N. 2005. Three Factors <strong>in</strong> Language Design. L<strong>in</strong>guistic Inquiry 36:1–22. | Chomsky, N. 2011. The poverty of <strong>the</strong>stimulus, unf<strong>in</strong>ished bus<strong>in</strong>ess. ms MIT. Di Sciullo, A. M. 2011. A Bioliguistic Approach to Variation. In A.M. Di Sciullo and C. Boeckx. TheBiol<strong>in</strong>guistic Enterprise: New perspectives on <strong>the</strong> evolution and nature of <strong>the</strong> human language faculty. New York: Oxford University Press. 305-328. | Di Sciullo, A.M. 2012. Perspectives on Morphological Complexity. In Morphology. (Ir)regularity, Frequency, Typology, F. Kiefer, M.Ladanyi and P. Siptar (dir.). Amsterdam : John Benjam<strong>in</strong>s. p.105-135.Djamouri, R., P. Waltraud and J. Whitman. 2011. Postpositions vs.Prepositions <strong>in</strong> Mandar<strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese: The Articulation of Disharmony, Theoretical Approaches to Disharmonic Word Orders, ed. by T. Biberauer andM. Sheehan, Oxford University Press. | Greenberg, J. 1966. Language Universals: With Special Reference to Feature Hierarchies. The Hague:Mouton. | Kayne, R. 2011. Why are There No Directionality Parameters ? In M Byram Washburn et al (ed) Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of <strong>the</strong> 28th West CoastConference on Formal <strong>L<strong>in</strong>guistics</strong>. Somerville: Cascadilla. Pp. 1-23. | Palmer, A.R.1996. From symmetry to asymmetry: Phylogenetic patterns ofasymmetry variation <strong>in</strong> animals and <strong>the</strong>ir evolutionary significance. Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of <strong>the</strong> National Academy of Sciences (USA) 93: 14279-14286. |Palmer, A.R. 2004. Symmetry break<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>the</strong> evolution of development. Science 306:828-833. | Niyogi, P. 2006. The Computational Nature ofLanguage Learn<strong>in</strong>g and Evolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. | Niyogi, P. and Berwick, R. C. 2009. The proper treatment of language acquisitionand change <strong>in</strong> a population sett<strong>in</strong>g. PNAS, 106(25):10124-10129. | Palmer, A.R. and R.C. Lewont<strong>in</strong>. 2004. Selection for asymmetry. Science306:812-813. | Yang, C. 2002. Knowledge and Learn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Natural Language. OUP. | Yang, C. 2009. Who’s afraid of George K<strong>in</strong>gsley Zipf?. Ms.UPenn.
- Page 1 and 2:
GLOW Newsletter #70, Spring 2013Edi
- Page 3 and 4:
INTRODUCTIONWelcome to the 70 th GL
- Page 5:
Welcome to GLOW 36, Lund!The 36th G
- Page 8 and 9:
REIMBURSEMENT AND WAIVERSThe regist
- Page 10 and 11:
STATISTICS BY COUNTRYCountry Author
- Page 12 and 13:
15:45-16:00 Coffee break16:00-17:00
- Page 14 and 15: 14:00-15:00 Adam Albright (MIT) and
- Page 16 and 17: 17:00-17:30 Anna Maria Di Sciullo (
- Page 18 and 19: 16.10-16.50 Peter Svenonius (Univer
- Page 20 and 21: GLOW 36 WORKSHOP PROGRAM IV:Acquisi
- Page 22 and 23: The impossible chaos: When the mind
- Page 24 and 25: 17. Friederici, A. D., Trends Cogn.
- Page 26 and 27: Second, tests replicated from Bruen
- Page 28 and 29: clusters is reported to be preferre
- Page 30 and 31: occur (cf. figure 1). Similar perfo
- Page 32 and 33: argument that raises to pre-verbal
- Page 34 and 35: Timothy Bazalgette University of
- Page 36 and 37: . I hurt not this knee now (Emma 2;
- Page 38 and 39: Rajesh Bhatt & Stefan Keine(Univers
- Page 40 and 41: SIZE MATTERS: ON DIACHRONIC STABILI
- Page 42 and 43: ON THE ‘MAFIOSO EFFECT’ IN GRAM
- Page 44 and 45: The absence of coreferential subjec
- Page 46 and 47: PROSPECTS FOR A COMPARATIVE BIOLING
- Page 48 and 49: A multi-step algorithm for serial o
- Page 50 and 51: Velar/coronal asymmetry in phonemic
- Page 52 and 53: On the bilingual acquisition of Ita
- Page 54 and 55: Hierarchy and Recursion in the Brai
- Page 56 and 57: Colorful spleeny ideas speak furiou
- Page 58 and 59: A neoparametric approach to variati
- Page 60 and 61: Lexical items merged in functional
- Page 62 and 63: Setting the elements of syntactic v
- Page 66 and 67: Don’t scope your universal quanti
- Page 68 and 69: Restricting language change through
- Page 70 and 71: 4. Conclusion This micro-comparativ
- Page 72 and 73: 2. Central Algonquian feature hiera
- Page 74 and 75: availability of the SR reading in (
- Page 76 and 77: Repairing Final-Over-Final Constrai
- Page 78 and 79: a PF interface phenomenon as propos
- Page 80 and 81: (b) Once the learner has determined
- Page 82 and 83: cognitive recursion (including Merg
- Page 84 and 85: can be null, or lexically realized,
- Page 86 and 87: feature on C and applies after Agre
- Page 88 and 89: Nobu Goto (Mie University)Deletion
- Page 90 and 91: Structural Asymmetries - The View f
- Page 92 and 93: FROM INFANT POINTING TO THE PHASE:
- Page 94 and 95: Some Maladaptive Traits of Natural
- Page 96 and 97: Constraints on Concept FormationDan
- Page 98 and 99: More on strategies of relativizatio
- Page 100 and 101: ReferencesBayer, J. 1984. COMP in B
- Page 102 and 103: Improper movement and improper agre
- Page 104 and 105: Importantly, while there are plausi
- Page 106 and 107: This hypothesis makes two predictio
- Page 108 and 109: (3) a. Það finnst alltaf þremur
- Page 110 and 111: (2) Watashi-wa hudan hougaku -wa /*
- Page 112 and 113: However when the VP (or IP) is elid
- Page 114 and 115:
More specifically, this work reflec
- Page 116 and 117:
modality, or ii) see phonology as m
- Page 118 and 119:
(I) FWHA The wh-word shenme ‘what
- Page 120 and 121:
1The historical reality of biolingu
- Page 122 and 123:
Rita Manzini, FirenzeVariation and
- Page 124 and 125:
Non-counterfactual past subjunctive
- Page 126 and 127:
THE GRAMMAR OF THE ESSENTIAL INDEXI
- Page 128 and 129:
Motivating head movement: The case
- Page 130 and 131:
Limits on Noun-suppletionBeata Mosk
- Page 132 and 133:
Unbounded Successive-Cyclic Rightwa
- Page 134 and 135:
Same, different, other, and the his
- Page 136 and 137:
Selectivity in L3 transfer: effects
- Page 138 and 139:
Anaphoric dependencies in real time
- Page 140 and 141:
Constraining Local Dislocation dial
- Page 142 and 143:
A Dual-Source Analysis of GappingDa
- Page 144 and 145:
[9] S. Repp. ¬ (A& B). Gapping, ne
- Page 146 and 147:
of Paths into P path and P place is
- Page 148 and 149:
Deriving the Functional HierarchyGi
- Page 150 and 151:
Reflexivity without reflexivesEric
- Page 152 and 153:
Reuland, E. (2001). Primitives of b
- Page 154 and 155:
on v, one associated with uϕ and t
- Page 156 and 157:
Merge when applied to the SM interf
- Page 158 and 159:
1 SachsThe Semantics of Hindi Multi
- Page 160 and 161:
Covert without overt: QR for moveme
- Page 162 and 163:
Morpho-syntactic transfer in L3 acq
- Page 164 and 165:
one where goals receive a theta-rel
- Page 166 and 167:
51525354555657585960616263646566676
- Page 168 and 169:
follow Harris in assuming a ranked
- Page 170 and 171:
changing instances of nodes 7 and 8
- Page 172 and 173:
Sam Steddy, steddy@mit.eduMore irre
- Page 174 and 175:
Fleshing out this model further, I
- Page 176 and 177:
(5) Raman i [ CP taan {i,∗j}Raman
- Page 178 and 179:
properties with Appl (introduces an
- Page 180 and 181:
econstruct to position A then we ca
- Page 182 and 183:
(5) Kutik=i ez guret-a.dog=OBL.M 1S
- Page 184 and 185:
sults summarized in (2) suggest tha
- Page 186 and 187:
Building on Bhatt’s (2005) analys
- Page 188 and 189:
Underlying (derived from ON) /pp, t
- Page 190 and 191:
out, as shown in (3) (that the DP i
- Page 192 and 193:
Word order and definiteness in the
- Page 194 and 195:
Visser’s Generalization and the c
- Page 196 and 197:
the key factors. The combination of
- Page 198 and 199:
Parasitic Gaps Licensed by Elided S
- Page 200 and 201:
Stages of grammaticalization of the