09.07.2015 Views

Practical Information - Generative Linguistics in the Old World

Practical Information - Generative Linguistics in the Old World

Practical Information - Generative Linguistics in the Old World

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Language Faculty, Complexity Reduction and Symmetry Break<strong>in</strong>gAnna Maria Di Sciullo, Université du Québec à Montréal1. I assume that <strong>the</strong> Language Faculty is stable, it does not vary though time and space, and thatlanguage development requires experience (Chomsky 1995, 2005, 2011). I develop <strong>the</strong> view thatlanguage evolutionary development is <strong>the</strong> result of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>teraction of <strong>the</strong> language faculty +experience with factors reduc<strong>in</strong>g complexity (Third Factor).2. The relation between <strong>the</strong> language faculty and pr<strong>in</strong>ciples reduc<strong>in</strong>g complexity has been part of<strong>the</strong> research agenda <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> generative enterprise s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> 50’s. Framed with<strong>in</strong> Biol<strong>in</strong>guistics, <strong>the</strong>pr<strong>in</strong>ciples of efficient computation can be thought of as be<strong>in</strong>g natural laws affect<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>computations of <strong>the</strong> Language Faculty (No Tamper<strong>in</strong>g Condition, Derivation by Phase, M<strong>in</strong>imalSearch, Pronounce <strong>the</strong> M<strong>in</strong>imum, a.o.). O<strong>the</strong>r complexity-reduc<strong>in</strong>g factors <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>the</strong> mechanismsrestrict<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> set of possible acquirable grammars (Yang 2002, Niyogi 2006, Niyogi and Berwick2009). Yet o<strong>the</strong>r such factors may come from natural processes, such as symmetry break<strong>in</strong>g (DiSciullo 2011, 2012). Symmetry break<strong>in</strong>g is a process that br<strong>in</strong>gs a system from a symmetric state(∀a,b ∈ X, aRb ⇒bRa) to an asymmetric state (∀a,b ∈ X, aRb ⇒¬bRa), and which has beenargued to affect syntactic derivations <strong>in</strong> Moro (2000).3. Several works <strong>in</strong> evolutionary developmental biology provide evidence that variation <strong>in</strong> biologyis symmetry break<strong>in</strong>g (Graham, Freeman and Emlen 1993; Lowent<strong>in</strong> 2000, 2006; Palmer 2004,2008; Palmer and Lowent<strong>in</strong> 2004). Symmetry break<strong>in</strong>g is part of <strong>the</strong> processes affect<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> shapeof biological organisms. Palmer identifies phylogenic patterns of variance <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> evolution ofbilateral asymmetric species. Namely, <strong>the</strong> fact that Fluctuat<strong>in</strong>g Asymmetry, i.e., <strong>the</strong> random left orright prom<strong>in</strong>ence, precedes Directional Asymmetry, i.e., <strong>the</strong> clear, exclusive left or rightprom<strong>in</strong>ence of bipartite organisms. This pattern of variance on <strong>the</strong> shape of biological organisms isan effect of external factors on <strong>the</strong>se organisms. Symmetry break<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> computationalprocedure of <strong>the</strong> language faculty may f<strong>in</strong>d its orig<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> natural processes affect<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>evolution of <strong>the</strong> shape of biological organisms. Seen as a natural process external to <strong>the</strong> LanguageFaculty, symmetry break<strong>in</strong>g may contribute to our understand<strong>in</strong>g of language development.4. A strik<strong>in</strong>g fact <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> development of <strong>the</strong> nom<strong>in</strong>al extended projection <strong>in</strong> Indo-Europeanlanguages is that while pre and post nom<strong>in</strong>al positions for a functional category are possible <strong>in</strong>earlier stages of <strong>the</strong> languages, only one position is available <strong>in</strong> later stages. This phenomenon isnei<strong>the</strong>r language specific nor category specific, as it can be observed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> development ofprepositions <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Indo-European languages, <strong>the</strong> def<strong>in</strong>ite determ<strong>in</strong>er from <strong>Old</strong> to ModernRomanian, <strong>the</strong> possessive adjectives from Ancient to Modern Greek and from Lat<strong>in</strong> to <strong>the</strong>Romance languages. I raise <strong>the</strong> question of why this is <strong>the</strong> case.5. I argue that this phenomenon is <strong>the</strong> consequence of <strong>the</strong> Head Initial/F<strong>in</strong>al Constra<strong>in</strong>t, (1), whichI propose to be an evolutionary developmental universal.(1) The Head Initial⁄F<strong>in</strong>al Constra<strong>in</strong>t (HI/FC)The choice between <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>itial and <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>al position for a functionalhead <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> same extended projection is elim<strong>in</strong>ated <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> evolution of languages.The HI/FC is an <strong>in</strong>stance of <strong>the</strong> Directional Asymmetry pr<strong>in</strong>ciple, (2), that may f<strong>in</strong>d its source <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> biological evolutionary development of bipartite organisms where <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g historicalevolutionary path is observed: fluctuat<strong>in</strong>g asymmetry > directional asymmetry. In <strong>the</strong> fluctuat<strong>in</strong>gasymmetry stage ei<strong>the</strong>r one or <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r side of a bipartite organism can be prom<strong>in</strong>ent, whereas <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> directional asymmetry stage, only one is.(2) Directional Asymmetry (DA)Language evolutionary development is symmetry break<strong>in</strong>g.While <strong>the</strong>re is noth<strong>in</strong>g like language, language rema<strong>in</strong>s an object of <strong>the</strong> natural world, and thus, itis subject to natural processes. Draw<strong>in</strong>g a parallel with functional projections, it is possible to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!