09.07.2015 Views

Practical Information - Generative Linguistics in the Old World

Practical Information - Generative Linguistics in the Old World

Practical Information - Generative Linguistics in the Old World

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Colorful spleeny ideas speak furiously.Norbert Corver (Utrecht university)1. Introduction. "Ideation reigns supreme <strong>in</strong> language, […] volition and emotion come <strong>in</strong> asdist<strong>in</strong>ctly secondary factors." With <strong>the</strong>se words, Edward Sapir (1921:217) claimed thatlanguage is primarily a tool for <strong>the</strong> expression of thought (ideas). The expression of affect isonly secondary. This secondary role is reflected <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> form of language: "[T]he emotionalaspect of our psychic life is but meagerly expressed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> build of language;" (Sapir ibidem).Roman Jakobson (1960) acknowledges <strong>the</strong> supremacy of <strong>the</strong> expression of thought butemphasizes "[...] that this supremacy does not authorize l<strong>in</strong>guistics to disregard <strong>the</strong> 'secondaryfactors'." Jakobson argues that "[I]f we analyze language from <strong>the</strong> standpo<strong>in</strong>t of <strong>the</strong><strong>in</strong>formation it carries, we cannot restrict <strong>the</strong> notion of <strong>in</strong>formation to <strong>the</strong> cognitive aspect oflanguage.”The aim of this talk is to exam<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> "meager" formal expression of affective<strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> build of human language by closely consider<strong>in</strong>g and analyz<strong>in</strong>g a number ofaffect-related formal properties that are manifest <strong>in</strong> varieties of Dutch and languages closelyrelated to Dutch. At a more descriptive level, <strong>the</strong>se formal strategies of encod<strong>in</strong>g affective<strong>in</strong>formation can be characterized as be<strong>in</strong>g augmentative: <strong>the</strong>y make <strong>the</strong> structure 'bigger' andeffectuate a concomitant <strong>in</strong>tensify<strong>in</strong>g mean<strong>in</strong>g. Three types of augmentative strategies will beconsidered: (i) augmentation by local dislocation; (ii) augmentation by "<strong>in</strong>formationspread<strong>in</strong>g" (affective concord); (iii) augmentation by coord<strong>in</strong>ation.2. Augmentation by local dislocation. Start<strong>in</strong>g from Pos's (1933/34:328) <strong>in</strong>tuition that <strong>the</strong>expression of affect <strong>in</strong>volves <strong>the</strong> "<strong>in</strong>verse use" of functional material ("Mais la fonctionlogique des particules n'est pas la seule qui leur appartienne. Elles ont un autre emploi qui suitun sense <strong>in</strong>verse: l'usage émotif et affectif."), I will propose an analysis <strong>in</strong> which this "<strong>in</strong>verseuse of functional <strong>in</strong>formation" is implemented by means of <strong>the</strong> displacement property.Crucially, this affect-related displacement is not operative <strong>in</strong> (narrow) syntax but after syntax,<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sense of Embick and Noyer (2001). More specifically, I will argue that functionalmaterial (e.g., <strong>the</strong> categories D or Deg) is reordered by means of Local Dislocation, amorphological merger operation that operates on a l<strong>in</strong>ear str<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>in</strong>verts <strong>the</strong> order of twoadjacent elements: i.e., [X * [Z * Y]] is changed <strong>in</strong>to [[ Z o Z+X] * Y]. Inversion yields a"structurally augmented" head (i.e., Z is turned <strong>in</strong>to [ Z o Z+X]). As we will show, <strong>in</strong> manyvarieties of Dutch, <strong>the</strong> augment<strong>in</strong>g affix surfaces phonologically as <strong>the</strong> sound 'schwa', whichmay be considered a 'default/dummy sound' which spells out <strong>the</strong> augmentative part Z.As an illustration of this l<strong>in</strong>guistic encod<strong>in</strong>g ("packag<strong>in</strong>g") of affective <strong>in</strong>formation,consider <strong>the</strong> data <strong>in</strong> (1), drawn from Katwijk Dutch (Overdiep 1937; Corver 2004). As<strong>in</strong>dicated, <strong>the</strong> quantity designat<strong>in</strong>g noun <strong>in</strong> pseudopartitive constructions can be augmented bymeans of e (schwa), yield<strong>in</strong>g an affective "color" (suprise, astonishment).(1) a. Toekregewe'nhoopwaeter,entoeriepdeskipper... (neutral) <strong>the</strong>ngotwealotwater,and<strong>the</strong>nshouted<strong>the</strong>boatsman... b. Toekregewe‐n‐om'nuurofdrietoch'nhoopewaeter,man! (affective) <strong>the</strong>ngotwe‐naroundanhourorthreePRTalot‐Ewater,man 'Ohman,aroundthreeo'clockwereallygotalotofwater<strong>in</strong>ourboat!'It will be argued that <strong>the</strong> augmented form hoope results from displacement (LocalDislocation) of <strong>the</strong> functional category D onto <strong>the</strong> measure noun hoop, yield<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>augmented head [N+D], which spells out as hoop+e. It will fur<strong>the</strong>r be shown that this strategyof augmentation is attested <strong>in</strong> different structural environments <strong>in</strong> varieties of Dutch: e.g., (i)pronom<strong>in</strong>als (ik 'I', ikke, I+-e), (ii) proper names (de Miel, <strong>the</strong> + Miel; de Miele), (iii) die('that', referential use) den dieje ('that', affective use), (iv) degree adverbs (verdomd duur'damned expensive'; verdomde duur), and (v) attributive adjectives (Afrikaans: 'n mooi konyn'a beautiful rabbit' (neutral read<strong>in</strong>g), 'n mooie konyn (affective read<strong>in</strong>g).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!