Colorful spleeny ideas speak furiously.Norbert Corver (Utrecht university)1. Introduction. "Ideation reigns supreme <strong>in</strong> language, […] volition and emotion come <strong>in</strong> asdist<strong>in</strong>ctly secondary factors." With <strong>the</strong>se words, Edward Sapir (1921:217) claimed thatlanguage is primarily a tool for <strong>the</strong> expression of thought (ideas). The expression of affect isonly secondary. This secondary role is reflected <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> form of language: "[T]he emotionalaspect of our psychic life is but meagerly expressed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> build of language;" (Sapir ibidem).Roman Jakobson (1960) acknowledges <strong>the</strong> supremacy of <strong>the</strong> expression of thought butemphasizes "[...] that this supremacy does not authorize l<strong>in</strong>guistics to disregard <strong>the</strong> 'secondaryfactors'." Jakobson argues that "[I]f we analyze language from <strong>the</strong> standpo<strong>in</strong>t of <strong>the</strong><strong>in</strong>formation it carries, we cannot restrict <strong>the</strong> notion of <strong>in</strong>formation to <strong>the</strong> cognitive aspect oflanguage.”The aim of this talk is to exam<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> "meager" formal expression of affective<strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> build of human language by closely consider<strong>in</strong>g and analyz<strong>in</strong>g a number ofaffect-related formal properties that are manifest <strong>in</strong> varieties of Dutch and languages closelyrelated to Dutch. At a more descriptive level, <strong>the</strong>se formal strategies of encod<strong>in</strong>g affective<strong>in</strong>formation can be characterized as be<strong>in</strong>g augmentative: <strong>the</strong>y make <strong>the</strong> structure 'bigger' andeffectuate a concomitant <strong>in</strong>tensify<strong>in</strong>g mean<strong>in</strong>g. Three types of augmentative strategies will beconsidered: (i) augmentation by local dislocation; (ii) augmentation by "<strong>in</strong>formationspread<strong>in</strong>g" (affective concord); (iii) augmentation by coord<strong>in</strong>ation.2. Augmentation by local dislocation. Start<strong>in</strong>g from Pos's (1933/34:328) <strong>in</strong>tuition that <strong>the</strong>expression of affect <strong>in</strong>volves <strong>the</strong> "<strong>in</strong>verse use" of functional material ("Mais la fonctionlogique des particules n'est pas la seule qui leur appartienne. Elles ont un autre emploi qui suitun sense <strong>in</strong>verse: l'usage émotif et affectif."), I will propose an analysis <strong>in</strong> which this "<strong>in</strong>verseuse of functional <strong>in</strong>formation" is implemented by means of <strong>the</strong> displacement property.Crucially, this affect-related displacement is not operative <strong>in</strong> (narrow) syntax but after syntax,<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sense of Embick and Noyer (2001). More specifically, I will argue that functionalmaterial (e.g., <strong>the</strong> categories D or Deg) is reordered by means of Local Dislocation, amorphological merger operation that operates on a l<strong>in</strong>ear str<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>in</strong>verts <strong>the</strong> order of twoadjacent elements: i.e., [X * [Z * Y]] is changed <strong>in</strong>to [[ Z o Z+X] * Y]. Inversion yields a"structurally augmented" head (i.e., Z is turned <strong>in</strong>to [ Z o Z+X]). As we will show, <strong>in</strong> manyvarieties of Dutch, <strong>the</strong> augment<strong>in</strong>g affix surfaces phonologically as <strong>the</strong> sound 'schwa', whichmay be considered a 'default/dummy sound' which spells out <strong>the</strong> augmentative part Z.As an illustration of this l<strong>in</strong>guistic encod<strong>in</strong>g ("packag<strong>in</strong>g") of affective <strong>in</strong>formation,consider <strong>the</strong> data <strong>in</strong> (1), drawn from Katwijk Dutch (Overdiep 1937; Corver 2004). As<strong>in</strong>dicated, <strong>the</strong> quantity designat<strong>in</strong>g noun <strong>in</strong> pseudopartitive constructions can be augmented bymeans of e (schwa), yield<strong>in</strong>g an affective "color" (suprise, astonishment).(1) a. Toekregewe'nhoopwaeter,entoeriepdeskipper... (neutral) <strong>the</strong>ngotwealotwater,and<strong>the</strong>nshouted<strong>the</strong>boatsman... b. Toekregewe‐n‐om'nuurofdrietoch'nhoopewaeter,man! (affective) <strong>the</strong>ngotwe‐naroundanhourorthreePRTalot‐Ewater,man 'Ohman,aroundthreeo'clockwereallygotalotofwater<strong>in</strong>ourboat!'It will be argued that <strong>the</strong> augmented form hoope results from displacement (LocalDislocation) of <strong>the</strong> functional category D onto <strong>the</strong> measure noun hoop, yield<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>augmented head [N+D], which spells out as hoop+e. It will fur<strong>the</strong>r be shown that this strategyof augmentation is attested <strong>in</strong> different structural environments <strong>in</strong> varieties of Dutch: e.g., (i)pronom<strong>in</strong>als (ik 'I', ikke, I+-e), (ii) proper names (de Miel, <strong>the</strong> + Miel; de Miele), (iii) die('that', referential use) den dieje ('that', affective use), (iv) degree adverbs (verdomd duur'damned expensive'; verdomde duur), and (v) attributive adjectives (Afrikaans: 'n mooi konyn'a beautiful rabbit' (neutral read<strong>in</strong>g), 'n mooie konyn (affective read<strong>in</strong>g).
3. Augmentation by spread<strong>in</strong>g. Ano<strong>the</strong>r phenomenon that relates to <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>guistic encod<strong>in</strong>gof affect may be neutrally labeled as "spread<strong>in</strong>g". In colloquial Dutch, certa<strong>in</strong> degree adverbscan "<strong>in</strong>herit" <strong>the</strong> adjectival <strong>in</strong>flectional morphology that is associated with <strong>the</strong> attributiveadjectival head modified by <strong>the</strong> degree adverb. For example, besides een (heel) erg dure fiets(a (so) terribly expensive-INFL bike) we f<strong>in</strong>d een (heel) erge dure fiets; and we even f<strong>in</strong>d: eenhele erge dure fiets. This spread<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>in</strong>flectional morphology affectively "colors" <strong>the</strong>complex adjectival expression. Importantly, spread<strong>in</strong>g seems to be subject to an adjacencyrequirement: if a PP <strong>in</strong>tervenes, spread<strong>in</strong>g is blocked. Compare: een erg(*e) [ PP daarvan]afhankelijke man (a very(*-INFL) <strong>the</strong>reupon dependent-INFL man) versus een [ PP daarvan]erg(-e) afhankelijke man. An analysis will be given <strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong> phi-features associated with<strong>the</strong> attributive head can spread onto a left-adjacent degree adverb by means of (leftward)Local Dislocation. From <strong>the</strong>re it can spread fur<strong>the</strong>r onto <strong>the</strong> next adjacent degree element.3. Augmentation by coord<strong>in</strong>ation. In <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>al part of <strong>the</strong> paper, I will discuss certa<strong>in</strong>properties of Dutch curse expressions that can also be characterized as be<strong>in</strong>g "augmentative".Structural augmentation can first of all be realized by means of <strong>the</strong> computational procedure(Merge). An <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly heightened emotional state can be expressed by an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>glymore complex curse expression: For example, besides <strong>the</strong> simplex curse expression godver(goddamit!), we also f<strong>in</strong>d more complex (i.e. augmented) ones such as godver de ju, godverde sakker de ju, and godver de sakker de non de ju. An analysis will be proposed accord<strong>in</strong>g towhich <strong>the</strong> augmented curse expressions <strong>in</strong>volve coord<strong>in</strong>ation; more specifically coord<strong>in</strong>ationof roots (√godver, √sakker, etc.), which is permitted given <strong>the</strong> category-less nature of Conj.The l<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g element de will be decomposed <strong>in</strong>to two items: d and e. The former will beanalyzed as an augmentative paragogic dental obstruent that gets attached to <strong>the</strong> curse atomend<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> er (e.g., godver+d), <strong>the</strong> latter will be analyzed as an augmentative sound 'schwa'that externalizes <strong>the</strong> Conj-head of <strong>the</strong> coord<strong>in</strong>ate structure, yield<strong>in</strong>g, for example, [ ConjPgodver+d [ Conj' -e [ju]]].4. The language-emotion <strong>in</strong>terface. A core question <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> M<strong>in</strong>imalist study of humanlanguage is whe<strong>the</strong>r it is well designed for <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>teraction with o<strong>the</strong>r systems that are <strong>in</strong>ternalto <strong>the</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d. One of those systems, arguably, is <strong>the</strong> emotion system, which, just like language,is a biological system (Damasio 1999:51). In Cartesian l<strong>in</strong>guistics (1966; 2009:78), Chomskyexplicitly mentions <strong>the</strong> expression of feel<strong>in</strong>gs through language: "We have observed that <strong>the</strong>study of <strong>the</strong> creative aspect of language use develops from <strong>the</strong> assumption that l<strong>in</strong>guistic andmental processes are virtually identical, language provid<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> primary means for <strong>the</strong> freeexpression of thought and feel<strong>in</strong>g, [..]" (boldface NC). The primacy of thought over feel<strong>in</strong>gis clear from Chomsky's claim that "[...] language evolved, and is designed, primarily as an<strong>in</strong>strument of thought;" (Chomsky 2009:29). Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Sapir, this asymmetry betweenthought and emotion/feel<strong>in</strong>g is reflected <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> build of human language. In l<strong>in</strong>e with Pos(1933/34), this paper implements <strong>the</strong> secondary role of affect <strong>in</strong> terms of <strong>the</strong> secondary(<strong>in</strong>verse) use and externalization of functional material (e.g., functional categories, <strong>in</strong>flection)at <strong>the</strong> Syntax-PF <strong>in</strong>terface. Such an approach is <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e with Chomsky's (2009:386) recentcharacterization of externalization as a secondary process.References: Chomsky, N. (1966/2009). Cartesian <strong>L<strong>in</strong>guistics</strong>. Cambridge: CUP. * Chomsky, N. (2009).Open<strong>in</strong>g remarks. In: P. Piattelli-Palmar<strong>in</strong>i et al (eds.). Of M<strong>in</strong>ds and Language. Oxford:OUP. * Corver, N.(2004) Some notes on emphatic forms and displacement <strong>in</strong> Dutch. In A. Breitbarth & H. van Riemsdijk (eds.),Triggers. 137-172. Berl<strong>in</strong>: Mouton de Gruyter. Damasio, A. (1999). The Feel<strong>in</strong>g of What Happens. San Diego:Harcourt, Inc. * Embick, D. & R. Noyer (2001). Movement operations after syntax. L<strong>in</strong>guistic Inquiry 32.4:555-595. * Jakobson, R. (1960). Clos<strong>in</strong>g statements: <strong>L<strong>in</strong>guistics</strong> and Poetics. In T.A. Sebeok (ed.). Style <strong>in</strong>language. 350-377. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. * Overdiep, G.S. (1937). Stilistische grammatica van hetmoderne Nederlandsch, Zwolle: W.E.J. Tjeenk Will<strong>in</strong>k. * Pos, H.J. (1933/34). Les particules, leurs fonctionslogiques et affectives. Recherches Philosophiques 3:321-333. * Sapir, E. (1921). Language. An Introduction to<strong>the</strong> Study of Speech. New York: Harcourt Brace.
- Page 1 and 2:
GLOW Newsletter #70, Spring 2013Edi
- Page 3 and 4:
INTRODUCTIONWelcome to the 70 th GL
- Page 5: Welcome to GLOW 36, Lund!The 36th G
- Page 8 and 9: REIMBURSEMENT AND WAIVERSThe regist
- Page 10 and 11: STATISTICS BY COUNTRYCountry Author
- Page 12 and 13: 15:45-16:00 Coffee break16:00-17:00
- Page 14 and 15: 14:00-15:00 Adam Albright (MIT) and
- Page 16 and 17: 17:00-17:30 Anna Maria Di Sciullo (
- Page 18 and 19: 16.10-16.50 Peter Svenonius (Univer
- Page 20 and 21: GLOW 36 WORKSHOP PROGRAM IV:Acquisi
- Page 22 and 23: The impossible chaos: When the mind
- Page 24 and 25: 17. Friederici, A. D., Trends Cogn.
- Page 26 and 27: Second, tests replicated from Bruen
- Page 28 and 29: clusters is reported to be preferre
- Page 30 and 31: occur (cf. figure 1). Similar perfo
- Page 32 and 33: argument that raises to pre-verbal
- Page 34 and 35: Timothy Bazalgette University of
- Page 36 and 37: . I hurt not this knee now (Emma 2;
- Page 38 and 39: Rajesh Bhatt & Stefan Keine(Univers
- Page 40 and 41: SIZE MATTERS: ON DIACHRONIC STABILI
- Page 42 and 43: ON THE ‘MAFIOSO EFFECT’ IN GRAM
- Page 44 and 45: The absence of coreferential subjec
- Page 46 and 47: PROSPECTS FOR A COMPARATIVE BIOLING
- Page 48 and 49: A multi-step algorithm for serial o
- Page 50 and 51: Velar/coronal asymmetry in phonemic
- Page 52 and 53: On the bilingual acquisition of Ita
- Page 54 and 55: Hierarchy and Recursion in the Brai
- Page 58 and 59: A neoparametric approach to variati
- Page 60 and 61: Lexical items merged in functional
- Page 62 and 63: Setting the elements of syntactic v
- Page 64 and 65: Language Faculty, Complexity Reduct
- Page 66 and 67: Don’t scope your universal quanti
- Page 68 and 69: Restricting language change through
- Page 70 and 71: 4. Conclusion This micro-comparativ
- Page 72 and 73: 2. Central Algonquian feature hiera
- Page 74 and 75: availability of the SR reading in (
- Page 76 and 77: Repairing Final-Over-Final Constrai
- Page 78 and 79: a PF interface phenomenon as propos
- Page 80 and 81: (b) Once the learner has determined
- Page 82 and 83: cognitive recursion (including Merg
- Page 84 and 85: can be null, or lexically realized,
- Page 86 and 87: feature on C and applies after Agre
- Page 88 and 89: Nobu Goto (Mie University)Deletion
- Page 90 and 91: Structural Asymmetries - The View f
- Page 92 and 93: FROM INFANT POINTING TO THE PHASE:
- Page 94 and 95: Some Maladaptive Traits of Natural
- Page 96 and 97: Constraints on Concept FormationDan
- Page 98 and 99: More on strategies of relativizatio
- Page 100 and 101: ReferencesBayer, J. 1984. COMP in B
- Page 102 and 103: Improper movement and improper agre
- Page 104 and 105: Importantly, while there are plausi
- Page 106 and 107:
This hypothesis makes two predictio
- Page 108 and 109:
(3) a. Það finnst alltaf þremur
- Page 110 and 111:
(2) Watashi-wa hudan hougaku -wa /*
- Page 112 and 113:
However when the VP (or IP) is elid
- Page 114 and 115:
More specifically, this work reflec
- Page 116 and 117:
modality, or ii) see phonology as m
- Page 118 and 119:
(I) FWHA The wh-word shenme ‘what
- Page 120 and 121:
1The historical reality of biolingu
- Page 122 and 123:
Rita Manzini, FirenzeVariation and
- Page 124 and 125:
Non-counterfactual past subjunctive
- Page 126 and 127:
THE GRAMMAR OF THE ESSENTIAL INDEXI
- Page 128 and 129:
Motivating head movement: The case
- Page 130 and 131:
Limits on Noun-suppletionBeata Mosk
- Page 132 and 133:
Unbounded Successive-Cyclic Rightwa
- Page 134 and 135:
Same, different, other, and the his
- Page 136 and 137:
Selectivity in L3 transfer: effects
- Page 138 and 139:
Anaphoric dependencies in real time
- Page 140 and 141:
Constraining Local Dislocation dial
- Page 142 and 143:
A Dual-Source Analysis of GappingDa
- Page 144 and 145:
[9] S. Repp. ¬ (A& B). Gapping, ne
- Page 146 and 147:
of Paths into P path and P place is
- Page 148 and 149:
Deriving the Functional HierarchyGi
- Page 150 and 151:
Reflexivity without reflexivesEric
- Page 152 and 153:
Reuland, E. (2001). Primitives of b
- Page 154 and 155:
on v, one associated with uϕ and t
- Page 156 and 157:
Merge when applied to the SM interf
- Page 158 and 159:
1 SachsThe Semantics of Hindi Multi
- Page 160 and 161:
Covert without overt: QR for moveme
- Page 162 and 163:
Morpho-syntactic transfer in L3 acq
- Page 164 and 165:
one where goals receive a theta-rel
- Page 166 and 167:
51525354555657585960616263646566676
- Page 168 and 169:
follow Harris in assuming a ranked
- Page 170 and 171:
changing instances of nodes 7 and 8
- Page 172 and 173:
Sam Steddy, steddy@mit.eduMore irre
- Page 174 and 175:
Fleshing out this model further, I
- Page 176 and 177:
(5) Raman i [ CP taan {i,∗j}Raman
- Page 178 and 179:
properties with Appl (introduces an
- Page 180 and 181:
econstruct to position A then we ca
- Page 182 and 183:
(5) Kutik=i ez guret-a.dog=OBL.M 1S
- Page 184 and 185:
sults summarized in (2) suggest tha
- Page 186 and 187:
Building on Bhatt’s (2005) analys
- Page 188 and 189:
Underlying (derived from ON) /pp, t
- Page 190 and 191:
out, as shown in (3) (that the DP i
- Page 192 and 193:
Word order and definiteness in the
- Page 194 and 195:
Visser’s Generalization and the c
- Page 196 and 197:
the key factors. The combination of
- Page 198 and 199:
Parasitic Gaps Licensed by Elided S
- Page 200 and 201:
Stages of grammaticalization of the