09.07.2015 Views

Practical Information - Generative Linguistics in the Old World

Practical Information - Generative Linguistics in the Old World

Practical Information - Generative Linguistics in the Old World

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>the</strong> key factors. The comb<strong>in</strong>ation of control and smuggl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> passive leads to explanationof ano<strong>the</strong>r puzzle: preservation of <strong>the</strong> pattern of OC <strong>in</strong>to an adjunct <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> passive, where <strong>the</strong>implicit Agent pro 1 should block this relation as a more m<strong>in</strong>imal potential antecedent, (cf.10b):(10) a. The boss 1 fired <strong>the</strong> pa<strong>in</strong>ter 2 [for PRO 2 dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>the</strong> job]b. The pa<strong>in</strong>ter 2 was fired [ vP pro 1 [for PRO 2 dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>the</strong> job]]c. [ TP <strong>the</strong> pa<strong>in</strong>ter 2 T-was [ VoiceP [ PartP Part [ VP [ VP fired <strong>the</strong> pa<strong>in</strong>ter 2 ][for PRO 2dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>the</strong> job]]] Voice [ vP pro 1 [ v’ v PartP]]]]Clearly, once <strong>the</strong> adjunct is promoted toge<strong>the</strong>r with <strong>the</strong> object <strong>in</strong>side PrtP, <strong>the</strong> preservation ofobject control is to be expected (cf. 10c).References: Chomsky, N. 1995. The M<strong>in</strong>imalist Program. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.; Coll<strong>in</strong>s, C.2005a. A smuggl<strong>in</strong>g approach to <strong>the</strong> passive <strong>in</strong> English. Syntax 8: 81-120.; Coll<strong>in</strong>s, C. 2005b. A smuggl<strong>in</strong>gapproach to rais<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> English. L<strong>in</strong>guistic Inquiry 36: 289-298.; Hornste<strong>in</strong>, N. 2001. Move! A m<strong>in</strong>imalist <strong>the</strong>oryof construal. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Blackwell. ; Hornste<strong>in</strong>, N. and M. Pol<strong>in</strong>sky. 2010. Control asmovement. In N. Hornste<strong>in</strong> and M. Pol<strong>in</strong>sky (eds.), Movement <strong>the</strong>ory of control, 1-41. Amsterdam: JohnBenjam<strong>in</strong>s.; Landau, I. 2001. Control and extraposition: <strong>the</strong> case of Super-Equi. Natural Language andL<strong>in</strong>guistic Theory 19: 109-152.; Landau, I. 2010. The locative syntax of experiencers. Cambridge, MA: MITPress.; Starke, M. 2001. Move dissolves <strong>in</strong>to Merge. Ph..D. diss., Geneva, University of Geneva.; van Urk, C.2011. On <strong>the</strong> syntactic reification of implicit subjects. Paper presented at WCCFL 29, University of Arizona.;Visser, Fredericus Theodoricus. 1973. A historical syntax of <strong>the</strong> English language. Vol. III.2. Leiden: Brill.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!