09.07.2015 Views

guidelines on variations to a registered pharmaceutical product

guidelines on variations to a registered pharmaceutical product

guidelines on variations to a registered pharmaceutical product

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Guidelines <strong>on</strong> Variati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>to</strong> a Registered Pharmaceutical Productsigned. Electr<strong>on</strong>ic versi<strong>on</strong>s of the applicati<strong>on</strong> form, both as a Worddocument and a scanned signed PDF file, should be provided;b) an updated quality informati<strong>on</strong> summary (QIS) (if applicable);c) replacement of the relevant secti<strong>on</strong>s of the dossier as per CTD format;d) copies of SmPC, PIL and labels, if relevant.It is <strong>to</strong> be noted that NDA reserves the right <strong>to</strong> request further informati<strong>on</strong> notexplicitly described in this guideline.The QIS provides a summary of the key quality informati<strong>on</strong> from the <strong>product</strong>dossier. For FPPs that have an agreed-up<strong>on</strong> QIS, the QIS should be revisedand submitted (in word format <strong>on</strong>ly) with every variati<strong>on</strong> applicati<strong>on</strong>. Any revisedsecti<strong>on</strong>s within the QIS should be highlighted. If there is no change <strong>to</strong> the QISas a result of the variati<strong>on</strong>, the current QIS should still be submitted and astatement made in the covering letter that there has been no change made <strong>to</strong>the QIS.Alternate approaches <strong>to</strong> the principles and practices described in this documentmay be acceptable provided they are supported by adequate scientificjustificati<strong>on</strong>. It is also important <strong>to</strong> note that NDA may request informati<strong>on</strong> ormaterial, or define c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s not specifically described in this guidance, in order<strong>to</strong> adequately assess the safety, efficacy and quality of an FPP.Doc. No.: DAR/GDL/005 Revisi<strong>on</strong> Date: 8 th July 2013 Review Due Date: 16 th July 2016Revisi<strong>on</strong> No.: 1 Effective Date : 16 th July 2013 Page 12 of 70

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!