2003; baxter - Supplements - Haematologica
2003; baxter - Supplements - Haematologica 2003; baxter - Supplements - Haematologica
[Immunobiology of Tolerance Induction]review paperT-lymphocytes in the anti-factorVIII immune responsehaematologica 2003; 88(suppl. n. 12):64-65http://www.haematologica.org/free/immunotolerance2001.pdfMARC G. JACQUEMIN, JEANMARIE R. SAINT-REMYCenter for Molecular and Vascular Biology, Universityof Leuven, BelgiumThe immune response towards factor VIII(FVIII), as for any other soluble glycoprotein,requires the participation of B- and T-lymphocytes. In the absence of specific T-cells nohelp is provided to B-cells to allow them tomature and differentiate into antibody secretingcells. Somewhat surprisingly, the involvement ofT-cells has been more or less neglected by mostinvestigators, when at the same time most effortwas been devoted to the characterization of B-cell epitopes and antibodies.Why is it so important to characterize specificanti-FVIII T-cells? First of all, T-cell recognitionof an antigen is the first specific event in themounting of an immune response. When anantigen enters the body, it has to be taken up bycells specialized in the presentation of it. Thisinvolves the intracellular digestion of the proteinfollowed by presentation of short peptidesderived from the digestion in the context ofMHC-class II molecules. The T-cell makes thefirst specific reading of the antigen, i.e. peptidebound to MHC class II alleles, which allows it tobecome activated and to provide B-cells with thehelp necessary for activation and the productionof antibodies.Second, T-cells recognize the peptide derivedfrom the antigen only when it is presented in theappropriate MHC class II molecule. This restrictionmakes it plausible that some alleles of MHCclass II molecules are preferentially associatedwith FVIII peptides. Therefore, it can be assumedon a theoretical basis that the capacity to produceinhibitor antibodies is associated with theexpression of a particular set of class II molecules.If so, this could represent a means to identifypatients at risk of producing inhibitory antibodies.Third, T-cells could represent an ideal target forthe design of an immunotherapy for FVIIIinhibitors. This is inherent to the actual characteristicsof the T-cell repertoire. T-cells are producedby the bone marrow, but must proceedthrough the thymus to acquire full maturation.The T-cell pool is essentially acquired at birth andmost of the thymus function disappears duringinfancy. Besides, the mechanism of somatichypermutation, which is responsible for a largeCorrespondence: JeanMarie R. Saint-Remy, Center for Molecularand Vascular Biology, University of Leuven, Belgium.E-mail: jeanmarie.saint-remy@med.kuleuven.ac.bepart of the diversity of B-cells, does not play arole at the level of T-cells. Controlling the T-cellarm of the anti-FVIII immune response could,therefore, result in a long-standing state of unresponsiveness.One caveat is however that the sizeof the T-cell repertoire is such that it has thecapacity to respond to any imaginable T-cell epitopein the universe. FVIII being a large molecule,it should always be possible to find a T-cellreacting towards it.Evidence for T-cell involvement in theanti-FVIII immune responseThe evidence is two-fold. In animal models,and in particular in the hemophilia A mousemodel, specific T-cells are already observed 3 daysafter the first administration of FVIII, well beforethe first antibodies can be detected. 1 It is alsoknown in such models that an interruption inthe B – T-cell dialog by, for instance, antibodiesto a surface molecule such as CD40L expressedon T-cells, prevents the development of theresponse. The second series of data comes fromobservations made in patients. A few years ago itwas observed that in HIV infected patients thetiter of anti-FVIII inhibitors declined togetherwith the number of CD4 + T-cells. 2More direct evidence has been obtained in manthrough the demonstration of FVIII-reactive T-cells in the peripheral blood of hemophilia Apatients with inhibitors. More recently, a veryexhaustive investigation was carried out using alarge number of synthetic peptides covering theentire FVIII sequence. These peptides were incubatedwith peripheral blood T-cells of hemophiliaA patients with or without inhibitors. A largenumber of FVIII peptides activating CD4 + T-cellswere found. However, screening hemophilia Apatients without inhibitor and healthy individualsas controls, it was found that individuals withnormal levels of FVIII also had specific T-cells intheir circulation. 3The latter observation raised questions aboutthe meaning of these findings. In vivo, theimmune system is confronted by full proteins andnot by peptides derived from them. T cell epitopeson a protein are organized according to a hierarchy.Major epitopes are dominant in the sensethat they are recognized by the large number andas a first line of recognition; these are also theepitopes towards which tolerance is establishedby selective deletion in the thymus. Minor epitopesare recognized less predominantly and oftenhaematologica vol. 88(supplement n. 12):september 2003
IV International Workshop on Immune Tolerance in Hemophilia65by a more restricted number of subjects. Crypticepitopes are not recognized when presentationstarts from the whole protein. However, crypticepitopes can be activated by peptides. As the tuningof the T-cell repertoire in the thymus is carriedout by deletion-selection on proteins, T-cells recognizingcryptic epitopes can be found in theperiphery.The quest for pathologically relevant T-cellsFrom the above, it appears that the identificationof T-cells of pathologic relevance, that is tosay T-cells with the capacity to drive the productionof inhibitor antibodies, could require furtherscrutiny. Nature offers us three situations withregards to FVIII. Healthy individuals with normallevels of FVIII have — presumably — had a chanceto eliminate strongly reactive T-cells from theirrepertoire during thymus maturation. T-cells toimmunodominant epitopes should, therefore, beabsent in the periphery. On the other hand, insevere hemophilia A, the absence of FVIII precludesthe negative selection of T-cells in thethymus: therefore in the periphery all T-cellsreacting to FVIII should be present. There is, however,an intermediate situation, in which patientssuffering from a mild degree of hemophilia A produceinhibitor antibodies towards normal wildtype FVIII, while remaining tolerant to their ownFVIII. Under such circumstances, the immunesystem should be purged from strongly reactive T-cells as for healthy individuals, except for these T-cells reacting against the site where the aminoacid substitution is located. Starting from suchpatients could offer a good opportunity to restrictthe population of T-cells greatly.T-cells were therefore cloned for the first timefrom T-cells of a mild hemophilia A patient carryinga mutation in the carboxy-terminal end ofthe C1 domain. 4 This patient produced inhibitorantibodies upon administration of wild-type FVIII,given to help the patient undergo a surgical intervention.T-cell cloning and characterizationA preparation of dendritic cells was made fromperipheral blood monocytes of the same patientfrom which T-cells had to be cloned. The latterwere selected by surface marker to obtain a pureCD4 + population. After several cycles of stimulationT-cells were cloned and expanded. Once theclones had been obtained, the search for specificitywas initiated by showing absence of proliferationand/or cytokine production in the presenceof autologous (mutated) FVIII, while strongactivation could be obtained by presentation ofwild-type FVIII.Synthetic peptides of various lengths centeredon the mutation site in the C1 domain were constructedand tested in the activation assay system.Three T-cell clones reacted towards the sameregion with subtle differences in the actual epitoperecognized. Recombinant FVIII moleculescarrying mutations within the carboxy-terminalend of the C1 domain were then tested for reactivitywith T-cell clones, some of which reactedstrongly.FVIII-specific T-cells: perspectivesWith such material at hand, it is now possibleto evaluate the MHC class II restriction of theFVIII recognition by T-cells, and perhaps identifyspecific alleles associated with activation of suchcells. This, as described above, could offer a markerpredisposing to the development of inhibitoryantibodies.A number of strategies aiming at making specificT-cells ignorant or unresponsive, or even todeleting such T-cells have been described in animalmodels in alternative research fields. It ishoped that the information gained in animalmodels will also hold true for FVIII. This is currentlybeing tested in mouse models of hemophiliaA. It can be expected that specific immunotherapyfor FVIII inhibitors targeting specificT-cells will become available in the near future.References1. Qian J, Collins M, Sharpe AH, Hoyer LW. Preventionand treatment of factor VIII inhibitors inmurine hemophilia A. Blood 2000; 95:1324-9.2. Bray GL, Kroner BL, Arkin S, Aledort LW, HilgartnerMW, Eyster ME, et al. Loss of high-responderinhibitors in patients with severe hemophilia A andhuman immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection: areport from the Multi-Center Hemophilia CohortStudy. Am J Hematol 1993; 42:375-9.3. Reding MT, Wu H, Krampf M, Okita DK, Diethelm-Okita BM, Christie BA, et al. Sensitization of CD4 +T cells to coagulation factor VIII: response in congenitaland acquired hemophilia patients and inhealthy subjects. Thromb Haemost 2000; 84:643-52.4. Jacquemin M, Burny W, Vantomme V, Chaux P,Lavend’homme R, Gilles JG, et al. High levels ofIFNγ production by FVIII-specific T cells from amild/moderate hemophilia A patient with inhibitor.42 nd Annual Meeting of the American Society forHematology, San Francisco, CA, USA, December2000.haematologica vol. 88(supplement n. 12):september 2003
- Page 17 and 18: IV International Workshop on Immune
- Page 19 and 20: IV International Workshop on Immune
- Page 21 and 22: IV International Workshop on Immune
- Page 23 and 24: IV International Workshop on Immune
- Page 25 and 26: IV International Workshop on Immune
- Page 27 and 28: IV International Workshop on Immune
- Page 29 and 30: IV International Workshop on Immune
- Page 31 and 32: IV International Workshop on Immune
- Page 33 and 34: [Round Table on Immune Tolerance Tr
- Page 35 and 36: IV International Workshop on Immune
- Page 37 and 38: IV International Workshop on Immune
- Page 39 and 40: IV International Workshop on Immune
- Page 41 and 42: IV International Workshop on Immune
- Page 43 and 44: IV International Workshop on Immune
- Page 45 and 46: IV International Workshop on Immune
- Page 47 and 48: IV International Workshop on Immune
- Page 49 and 50: [Round Table on Immune Tolerance Tr
- Page 51 and 52: IV International Workshop on Immune
- Page 53 and 54: IV International Workshop on Immune
- Page 55 and 56: IV International Workshop on Immune
- Page 57 and 58: IV International Workshop on Immune
- Page 59 and 60: [Immunobiology of Tolerance Inducti
- Page 61 and 62: IV International Workshop on Immune
- Page 63 and 64: IV International Workshop on Immune
- Page 65 and 66: IV International Workshop on Immune
- Page 67: IV International Workshop on Immune
- Page 71 and 72: IV International Workshop on Immune
- Page 73 and 74: [New Aspects in Treatment of Hemoph
- Page 75 and 76: [New Aspects in Treatment of Hemoph
- Page 77 and 78: IV International Workshop on Immune
- Page 79 and 80: [New Aspects in Treatment of Hemoph
- Page 81 and 82: IV International Workshop on Immune
- Page 83 and 84: IV International Workshop on Immune
- Page 85 and 86: IV International Workshop on Immune
- Page 87 and 88: IV International Workshop on Immune
- Page 89 and 90: IV International Workshop on Immune
- Page 91 and 92: IV International Workshop on Immune
- Page 93 and 94: IV International Workshop on Immune
- Page 95 and 96: IV International Workshop on Immune
- Page 97 and 98: [Acquired Inhibitors in Non-Hemophi
- Page 99 and 100: IV International Workshop on Immune
- Page 101 and 102: IV International Workshop on Immune
- Page 103 and 104: IV International Workshop on Immune
- Page 105 and 106: IV International Workshop on Immune
- Page 107 and 108: IV International Workshop on Immune
- Page 109 and 110: IV International Workshop on Immune
- Page 111 and 112: IV International Workshop on Immune
- Page 113 and 114: IV International Workshop on Immune
- Page 115 and 116: [Gene Therapy]review paperThe host
- Page 117 and 118: IV International Workshop on Immune
[Immunobiology of Tolerance Induction]review paperT-lymphocytes in the anti-factorVIII immune responsehaematologica <strong>2003</strong>; 88(suppl. n. 12):64-65http://www.haematologica.org/free/immunotolerance2001.pdfMARC G. JACQUEMIN, JEANMARIE R. SAINT-REMYCenter for Molecular and Vascular Biology, Universityof Leuven, BelgiumThe immune response towards factor VIII(FVIII), as for any other soluble glycoprotein,requires the participation of B- and T-lymphocytes. In the absence of specific T-cells nohelp is provided to B-cells to allow them tomature and differentiate into antibody secretingcells. Somewhat surprisingly, the involvement ofT-cells has been more or less neglected by mostinvestigators, when at the same time most effortwas been devoted to the characterization of B-cell epitopes and antibodies.Why is it so important to characterize specificanti-FVIII T-cells? First of all, T-cell recognitionof an antigen is the first specific event in themounting of an immune response. When anantigen enters the body, it has to be taken up bycells specialized in the presentation of it. Thisinvolves the intracellular digestion of the proteinfollowed by presentation of short peptidesderived from the digestion in the context ofMHC-class II molecules. The T-cell makes thefirst specific reading of the antigen, i.e. peptidebound to MHC class II alleles, which allows it tobecome activated and to provide B-cells with thehelp necessary for activation and the productionof antibodies.Second, T-cells recognize the peptide derivedfrom the antigen only when it is presented in theappropriate MHC class II molecule. This restrictionmakes it plausible that some alleles of MHCclass II molecules are preferentially associatedwith FVIII peptides. Therefore, it can be assumedon a theoretical basis that the capacity to produceinhibitor antibodies is associated with theexpression of a particular set of class II molecules.If so, this could represent a means to identifypatients at risk of producing inhibitory antibodies.Third, T-cells could represent an ideal target forthe design of an immunotherapy for FVIIIinhibitors. This is inherent to the actual characteristicsof the T-cell repertoire. T-cells are producedby the bone marrow, but must proceedthrough the thymus to acquire full maturation.The T-cell pool is essentially acquired at birth andmost of the thymus function disappears duringinfancy. Besides, the mechanism of somatichypermutation, which is responsible for a largeCorrespondence: JeanMarie R. Saint-Remy, Center for Molecularand Vascular Biology, University of Leuven, Belgium.E-mail: jeanmarie.saint-remy@med.kuleuven.ac.bepart of the diversity of B-cells, does not play arole at the level of T-cells. Controlling the T-cellarm of the anti-FVIII immune response could,therefore, result in a long-standing state of unresponsiveness.One caveat is however that the sizeof the T-cell repertoire is such that it has thecapacity to respond to any imaginable T-cell epitopein the universe. FVIII being a large molecule,it should always be possible to find a T-cellreacting towards it.Evidence for T-cell involvement in theanti-FVIII immune responseThe evidence is two-fold. In animal models,and in particular in the hemophilia A mousemodel, specific T-cells are already observed 3 daysafter the first administration of FVIII, well beforethe first antibodies can be detected. 1 It is alsoknown in such models that an interruption inthe B – T-cell dialog by, for instance, antibodiesto a surface molecule such as CD40L expressedon T-cells, prevents the development of theresponse. The second series of data comes fromobservations made in patients. A few years ago itwas observed that in HIV infected patients thetiter of anti-FVIII inhibitors declined togetherwith the number of CD4 + T-cells. 2More direct evidence has been obtained in manthrough the demonstration of FVIII-reactive T-cells in the peripheral blood of hemophilia Apatients with inhibitors. More recently, a veryexhaustive investigation was carried out using alarge number of synthetic peptides covering theentire FVIII sequence. These peptides were incubatedwith peripheral blood T-cells of hemophiliaA patients with or without inhibitors. A largenumber of FVIII peptides activating CD4 + T-cellswere found. However, screening hemophilia Apatients without inhibitor and healthy individualsas controls, it was found that individuals withnormal levels of FVIII also had specific T-cells intheir circulation. 3The latter observation raised questions aboutthe meaning of these findings. In vivo, theimmune system is confronted by full proteins andnot by peptides derived from them. T cell epitopeson a protein are organized according to a hierarchy.Major epitopes are dominant in the sensethat they are recognized by the large number andas a first line of recognition; these are also theepitopes towards which tolerance is establishedby selective deletion in the thymus. Minor epitopesare recognized less predominantly and oftenhaematologica vol. 88(supplement n. 12):september <strong>2003</strong>