09.07.2015 Views

2003; baxter - Supplements - Haematologica

2003; baxter - Supplements - Haematologica

2003; baxter - Supplements - Haematologica

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

116T. VandenDriessche et al.• the vector should have the potential for longterm,preferably life-long FVIII gene expression;• the vector should be capable of efficient andpreferably selective gene transfer into theappropriate target cells, particularly hepatocytes,which normally express FVIII;• lack of de novo expression of viral genes in thetransduced target cells is required to avoidimmune rejection of transduced target cells;• the vector should not trigger any toxic oradverse side-effects;• inadvertent germline gene transfer should notoccur following somatic gene therapy;• vector preparations should be devoid of helpervirus or replication-competent virus;• the vector should not trigger inflammatoryimmune responses;• transduction in antigen-presenting cells(APCs) should be avoided to decrease the likelihoodof anti-FVIII antibodies;• vector administration should preferably benon-invasive;• the vector should not integrate into the targetcell genome to avoid insertional mutagenesisof cellular genes, particularly tumor suppressorgenes.There are currently no viral vectors that meetall these requirements. Nevertheless, there are anumber of promising vectors that can be usedfor hemophilia A gene therapy, each with theirown advantages and limitations, in particular:onco-retroviral and lentiviral vectors, highcapacityadenoviral vectors (HC-Ad) and adenoassociatedviral vectors (AAV). These viral vectorsare devoid of viral genes and consequentlycannot replicate in the transduced cells andpropagate in vivo, in contrast to the viruses theyhave been derived from. Furthermore, these replication-deficientvectors cannot express any viralantigens de novo in the transduced cells, herebysafeguarding the transduced cells from possibleimmune rejection by cytotoxic T-lymphocytes(CTL). Nevertheless, FVIII gene transfer mayresult in the presentation of endogenously synthesizedFVIII–derived peptides in the context ofMHC class I molecules and trigger CTL responsesthat could eliminate the FVIII-engineered targetcells. In addition, the viral vector particlesthemselves may induce a humoral immuneresponse that would lead to the formation ofneutralizing antibodies directed at the vector capsidor envelope structures. These antibodiescould potentially interfere with viral transduction,if the patient were to receive a subsequentviral vector challenge.Our work in particular, focuses on the use ofonco-retroviral, lentiviral and HC-Ad vectors forhemophilia A gene therapy which will be summarizedbelow.MoMLV-based retroviral vectorsMoloney murine leukemia virus (MoMLV)-based retroviral vectors can potentially give rise tostable gene expression by virtue of their stablechromosomal integration and lack of viral geneexpression. 4,5 Their integration allows passage ofthe transgene to all progeny cells. However, celldivision is required for MoMLV transduction andintegration, thereby limiting retroviral-mediatedgene therapy to actively dividing target cells. Genetherapy for hemophilia with MoMLV-based vectorsrequires either direct in vivo transduction ofcells that are naturally proliferating or induced toproliferate using growth factors, or ex vivo expansionand transduction of target cells followed bytheir readministration. Stable packaging cell linesare available that facilitate the large scale productionand characterization of recombinantvirus for potential use in clinical trials. No acutetoxicity or adverse effects have been reported inmore than 100 clinical trials with retroviral vectors.6 Furthermore, retroviral vector preparationsdevoid of replication-competent retroviruses(RCR) have not been shown to cause malignanttransformation in animals or in patients. 7,8 Rareclonal transformation events have only beenobserved in severely immunocompromized primatesreceiving a high dose of contaminatingreplication competent retroviruses (RCR). 9 Retroviralvector-mediated gene transfer is thereforerelatively safe for gene therapy of hemophilia.Retroviral vectors containing the FVIII geneshave been developed. However, first-generationFVIII-retroviral vectors were characterized by lowtiters and low FVIII expression levels which initiallyhampered their usefulness for gene therapy.The presence of an intact FVIII cDNA intoMoMLV retroviral vectors resulted in a 100 to1000-fold decrease in vector titer in comparisonwith the parental vector or vectors carrying othersimilarly sized cDNAs. 10-16 The inhibition ofFVIII expression and the low viral titer were dueto the presence of sequences within the FVIIIcDNA that inhibited RNA accumulation byinterfering with transcriptional initiation orelongation (see above). 12,14 Conservative mutagenesisof the entire 1.2 kb INS element failed toincrease FVIII expression or vector titer. 13 However,we and others showed that this impedimentcould be circumvented by including an intronupstream of the FVIII cDNA which led to a significantincrease in FVIII expression and restoredretroviral titer to normal levels (105 transducingunits/mL) (TU/mL). 13,17 Although otherpost-transcriptional mechanisms may also beinvolved 18, this design was based on the observationthat splicing can improve mRNA accumulationby increasing transcriptional efficiency,stabilizing RNA and/or increasing transport fromthe nucleus to the cytoplasm. 19,20 These intronbasedFVIII onco-retroviral vectors could be concentratedto even higher titers (109-1010TU/mL) following pseudotyping with the vesicularstomatitis virus G-protein (VSV-G). 21,22 Thisconstitutes a 107-fold improvement comparedto non-concentrated early generation FVIII retro-haematologica vol. 88(supplement n. 12):september <strong>2003</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!