09.07.2015 Views

2003; baxter - Supplements - Haematologica

2003; baxter - Supplements - Haematologica

2003; baxter - Supplements - Haematologica

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

IV International Workshop on Immune Tolerance in Hemophilia 103antigen exposure can be detected using anticlonotypicantibodies and flow cytometry. Withthis simple approach, the fate of fetal-specific Tcells can be clearly evaluated. We utilized pregnantmice in which the T cells expressed a transgenicTCR specific for the male antigen H-Y presentedby H-2 D b32 and in which the recombinaseactivating gene-2 had been eliminated byhomologous recombination (RAG-2-/-), renderingthese mice incapable of expressingendogenous (non-transgenic) TCR. In this model,all the T cells expressed the transgenic TCRspecific for H-Y that would be expressed by themale fetuses. Monitoring of maternal T cellsexpressing the clonotypic H-Y-specific TCR inthese mice revealed that the number of cellsexpressing the clonotypic TCR in spleendecreased. 33 By 18 days of gestation, there was a40% decrease in overall cell number that correspondedwith a loss in splenic, clonotypic T cellsand by 5 day post-partum, the number of clonotype-expressingT cells was only 50% that of nonpregnantcontrols. There was no detectabledownregulation in co-receptor, or for that matterin TCR expression, nor was there a rapidrecovery to pre-pregnancy cell numbers after parturition.33 As no decrease was observed in pregnancieswith all females in the litter, 34 these datademonstrate that the elimination of T cellsobserved in pregnant H-Y-specific TCR trangenicmice was due to encounter with male antigenand not the result of non-specific effects of pregnancy.It is also important to note that pregnanciesproceeded normally with normal numbersof offspring, and no skewing of sex that wouldsuggest a bias against male offspring. 33While 50% of H-Y specific maternal T cells disappearedfrom spleen, it was unclear whetherthose cells remaining were naïve and simply hadnot encountered antigen, or whether encounterwith antigen had induced tolerance by anothermechanism. Analysis of the proliferativeresponse of clonotype-expressing T cells fromnon-pregnant or gestational day 18 TCR transgenicRAG-2-/- mice revealed deficient responsesto male antigen-presenting cells (APCs) or tolow concentrations of the H-Y peptide in thosecells isolated from pregnant mice, compared toresponses observed in non-pregnant controls. 33However, potent stimulation via either crosslinkingof the TCR with anti-TCRβ antibody or highconcentrations of the H-Y peptide induced equivalentproliferative responses from T cells isolatedfrom both non-pregnant or pregnant mice.Decreased responsiveness was not only observedin proliferative responses, but also in cytotoxic Tlymphocyte (CTL) responses, although interestingly,cytokine production was unaltered in thepregnant females. 34 Furthermore, decreasedresponsiveness could not be attributed todecreased avidity for the antigen/MHC complexas downregulation of the TCR or CD8 was notobserved. In addition, unresponsiveness persistedbeyond the time of parturition to at least 5days post-partum. This antigen-specific nonresponsivenessis not attributable to generalizednon-responsiveness to antigen during pregnancybecause deficient T-cell proliferative responsesto antigen were not observed in T cells isolatedfrom pregnant H-Y-specific TCR transgenicmice that had female-only litters (no H-Y antigenpresent). 34A requirement for CD28 co-stimulation in theinduction of peripheral tolerance in CD8 T cellshas not previously been assessed. To address thisquestion, we bred female CD28-deficient H-YspecificTCR transgenic mice and compared themto their CD28 WT counterparts for the inductionof tolerance to the H-Y antigen expressed bymale fetuses during pregnancy. In contrast towhat has been observed in CD4 T cells, there wasno strong requirement for CD28 in the activationof these CD8 cells in vitro. However, surprisingly,while CD28 co-stimulation is dispensiblefor in vitro activation, it is required in vivofor both the induction of clonal deletion and forantigen-specific unresponsiveness to the fetalantigen H-Y during pregnancy. 34 In marked contrastto their CD28 WT counterparts, H-Y-specificT cells from pregnant CD28 knockout micedid not exhibit either decreased proliferation ordecreased CTL activity. However, T cells from theday 18 CD28 knockout pregnant mice had significantlylower levels of interferon-γ-producingcells than did T cells from the CD28 knockoutnon-pregnant females, indicating that these cellsare not antigen ignorant but have seen antigen invivo and responded, albeit in an altered manner.The decrease in interferon-γ-producing cells is anot a non-specific effect of pregnancy since Tcells from day 18 CD28 wild type pregnant micedid not exhibit decreased IFN-γ-producing cells.This type of split anergy, altered cytokine productionbut normal CTL function, in the absence ofco-stimulation has been observed by others. 35However, the significance of this altered ability toproduce IFN-γ is not yet understood.The dependence on CD28 co-stimulation forthe induction of both clonal deletion and anergyinduction is surprising. At least for CD4 Tcells, it has been proposed that CD28 co-stimulationis required for clonal deletion of T cells toself-antigen because activation is required foractivation induced cell death. 36 The absence ofclonal deletion in CD28 knockout mice would,therefore, be consistent with this model. However,it is also important to consider that whileCD4 T cells have a requisite dependence onCD28 for activation, it appears that the H-Y-specificCD8 T cells utilized in our study do not.Therefore, it is surprising that clonal deletion ofthese CD8 cells is CD28 dependent while activationis not.The role of co-stimulation in the induction ofanergy has previously been addressed in studiesof CD4 T cells. It has been proposed that CTLA-4/B7 interactions may be particularly importantin the induction of anergy. 37,38 It has also beenhaematologica vol. 88(supplement n. 12):september <strong>2003</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!