B io ph ile Issu e 18 - Biophile Magazine

B io ph ile Issu e 18 - Biophile Magazine B io ph ile Issu e 18 - Biophile Magazine

biophile.co.za
from biophile.co.za More from this publisher
09.07.2015 Views

Sounding the AlarmMore than forty years ago, Rachel Carson's Silent Spring foreverchanged our view of the environmentby Bruce Watsonmonth before World War II ended,a relatively unknown writer namedRachel Carson proposed an articlefor Reader's Digest about the effects ofthe pesticide DDT on what she called "thedelicate balance of nature." The shy womanassured the editors that "it's somethingthat really does affect everybody." Theyturned her down.Perhaps they felt a story about pesticideswould be too depressing. Or maybeit was that DDT, then widely used in theUnited States, had likely saved thousandsof American Marines and soldiers bykilling disease-carrying insects on far-offbeachheads, Carson filed the subject awayand went on to write best-selling books onthe wonders of the sea, A dozen years later,she decided to take up the topic again. Thistime would be different.While authors and publishers like tobelieve that a single book can change theworld,few books actually have had such animpact. Yet the day it hit bookstores morethan 40 years ago, Rachel Carson's SilentSpring fuelled a vigorous public debateabout the use of chemicals in our environmentthat has yet to be resolved."Without this book," wrote former VicePresident Al Gore in the introduction toa 1994 reprint of it, "the environmentalmovement might have been long delayed ornever have developed at all," This complex,lyrical volume led not only to the banningof DDT but eventually to the formation ofthe US Environmental Protection Agency."After Silent Spring,people began tothink about the chemicals they werehandling, what they were doing to theenvironment, and what scientists weren'ttelling them," says Carson biographerLinda Lear (Rachel Carson: Witness forNature, 1997). "They began to question thevery direction of technology."Carson had no intention of starting amovement. Working against time followinga diagnosis of cancer, she sounded herwake-up call in the name of songbirds, "IfI kept silent I could never again listen to athrush's song without overwhelming selfreproach,"she wrote. But in the fall of 1962,many scientists and people in the chemicalindustry wished she had kept silent.Growing up in western Pennsylvania,Rachel Louise Carson, known to friendsas Ray, immersed herself in nature andbooks, especially the sea sagas of Melvilleand Conrad. At the Pennsylvania Collegefor Women in the mid-1920s she changedher major from English to Biology, butretained a deep love of writing. Eventuallyshe earned a master's degree in MarineZoology from Johns Hopkins Universityand became a junior aquatic biologist forthe US Bureau of Fisheries in Washington,D.C.Her first book, Under the Sea-Wind,was published in 1941 and sold fewer than2 000 copies. But it put her in contact withscientists who were beginning to ask hardquestions about the fate of the earth.In the late 1940s, while working as publicationseditor for the Fishand WildlifeService, sheRachel Louise Carson (27 May 1907 —14 April1964) was an American marine biologistand nature writer whose landmark book, SilentSpring, is often credited with having launched theglobal environmental movement. Silent Springhad an immense effect in the United States,where it spurred a reversal in national pesticidepolicy. [Photo: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service]began her secondbook, The Sea Around Us. The literarysensation of 1951— topping best-seller listsand winning a National Book Award—itoutlined the latest science informingour understanding of the ocean. Carsonalmost instantly became the nation's unofficialspokesperson for the sea."Heavens!" she wrote a friend after winninganother accolade. "Is this all aboutme—it is really ridiculous!” Sea's successenabled her to become a full-time writerand buy a cottage on the coast of Maine,which would become a sanctuary for therest other life. While she would write anotherbook about the sea, she continued toharbor nagging questions about the effectof pesticides on the land.Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane(DDT) was first used as an insecticide in1959, just a few grains of the white powderwould miraculously wipe out coloniesof mosquito larvae. During World WarII, B-25 bombers sprayed DDT prior toinvasions in the Pacific. After the war,DDT would all but wipe out malaria in thedeveloped world and drastically reduce itelsewhere. (The National Academy of Sciencesreported in 1970 that DDT had savedmore than 500 million lives from malaria.)Paul Muller, the chemist who first turnedit on unsuspecting flies, won a Nobel Prizein 1948 for his work.By the late 1950s, DDT productionhad nearly quintupled from World WarII levels as municipal authorities took tospraying the chemical on American suburbsto eradicate tent caterpillars, gypsymoths and the beetles that carried Dutchelm disease.But the chemical had a disturbing characteristic,it killed indiscriminately. Afterfinding seven dead songbirds in her yard16 Biophile Issue 18

after the area had been sprayed againstmosquitoes, a Massachusetts friend ofCarson's wrote a letter to the BostonHerald in 1958 demanding that officials"stop the spraying of poisons from the air."Carson read the letter and realized that"everything which meant most to me as anaturalist was being threatened." She decidedto make DDT the subject of her nextbook, tentatively entitled Man Against theEarth.represent our willingness to rush aheadand use something new without knowingwhat the results are going to be."Suddenly in a single summer, chemicalscience had fallen from its pedestal. By lateAugust, reporters were asking PresidentKennedy if federal officials would beinvestigating the long-range effects ofpesticides. "They already are," he answered"I think particularly, of course, since MissCarson's book, but they are examining theAccording to the WorldwatchInstitute, a higher percentage ofcrops in America are now lost topests than before pesticides werefirst widely used.chapters, theauthor followed thetrail of pesticides from farm to familytable, provided a "Who's Who" of toxicchemicals—DDT, chlordane, malathion,parathion—and noted that pesticides accumulatein fatty tissues of organisms.Reaction to Silent Spring was quick,strong and largely negative. Life claimedthat Carson had "overstated her case."Time, citing scientists' claims that insecticideswere "harmless," dismissed it as an"emotional and inaccurate outburst." Thechemical and food industries came afterCarson aggressively. Chemical and EngineeringNews, a chemical industry trademagazine, linked Carson with "pseudoscientistsand faddists," denounced her"high-pitched sequences of anxieties" andbelittled her credentials. The NutritionFoundation mailed scathing reviews of thebook to newspapers. The National AgriculturalChemicals Association launcheda $250, 000 campaign to refute it, andthe Monsanto Corporation published aparody of Carson's opening fable, describinga world without pesticides, overrunby insects and disease. In a cartoon in theNovember 10, 1962, issue of the SaturdayReview, a man lamented "I had just cometo terms with fallout, and along comesRachel Carson."But there were voices of praise as well.Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglascalled Silent Spring "the most importantchronicle of this century for the humanrace."While undergoing debilitating radiationtreatments, Carson answered hercritics.No civilization, she said,"can wage relentless war onlife without destroying itself,and without losing the rightto be called civilized."But working on it in 1960, she was diagnosedwith breast cancer and underwenta mastectomy. Subsequent radiation treatmentsleft her nauseated and bedridden.The book she had expected to finish in afew months dragged on for four years.Finally, inJune 1962, the first of a threepartexcerpt from Silent Spring appearedin the New Yorker magazine. Beforethe final instalment hit newsstands, theVelsicol Corporation, which manufacturedthe pesticide chlordane (bannedin 1988), threatened to sue the magazinefor libel. "Everything in those articles hasbeen checked and is true," replied the NewYorker's legal counsel. "Go ahead and sue."The company never did, but the attackshad only begun. One reader wrote thatCarson's work "probably reflects her Communistsympathies."Then, in July, news broke that a supposedlyharmless drug given to thousands ofpregnant women in Europe for morningsickness had been determined to causewidespread birth defects. Newspapers andmagazines ran photographs of babies bornwithout arms and legs or otherwise physicallydeformed. "It's all of a piece," said Carson."Thalidomide and pesticides—theymatter."Silent Spring went on sale September27 and raced to the top of the New YorkTimes best-seller list where it stayed formost of the fall. By Christmas, the book,which begins with Carson's fable aboutan idyllic countryside that teemed withwildlife until "a strange blight crept overthe area and everything began to change,"had sold more than 100,000 copies. In subsequentShe insisted she was not against all pesticidesand had never called for banningthem, only for restricting their use. Publicopinion wavered. Then television tippedthe scales in her favor.In April 1963, 15 million Americanswatched CBS Reports' "The Silent Springof Rachel Carson.""We still talk in terms of conquest," Carsonsaid. "I think we're challenged, as mankindhas never been challengedbefore, to prove our maturity andour mastery, not of nature but ofourselves."Her thoughtful and reservedpresentation struck a chord withviewers: hundreds wrote concerned lettersto Carson, CBS, the USDA, the PublicHealth Service and the PDA. A month later,President Kennedy's Science AdvisoryCommittee released its own report onpesticides, which backed Carson's thesis,criticized the government and the chemicalindustry, and called for "orderly reductionsof persistent pesticides."Today, despite the banning of DDT in1972, pesticides are still widely used, andCarson, who died in 1964 at age 56 ofheart disease and the cancer she battledso valiantly, still comes in for criticism."Rachel Carson's book was a brilliant pieceof writing and a seminal work, but it's clearnow that she was more fearful of pesticidesthan was warranted," says DennisAvery, former senior agriculture expertBiophile Issue 1817

Sounding the AlarmMore than forty years ago, Rachel Carson's S<strong>ile</strong>nt Spring foreverchanged our view of the environmentby Bruce Watsonmonth before World War II ended,a relatively unknown writer namedRachel Carson proposed an articlefor Reader's Digest about the effects ofthe pesticide DDT on what she called "thedelicate balance of nature." The shy womanassured the editors that "it's somethingthat really does affect everybody." Theyturned her down.Perhaps they felt a story about pesticideswould be too depressing. Or maybeit was that DDT, then widely used in theUnited States, had likely saved thousandsof American Marines and soldiers bykilling disease-carrying insects on far-offbeachheads, Carson f<strong>ile</strong>d the subject awayand went on to write best-selling books onthe wonders of the sea, A dozen years later,she decided to take up the topic again. Thistime would be different.Wh<strong>ile</strong> authors and publishers like tobelieve that a single book can change theworld,few books actually have had such animpact. Yet the day it hit bookstores morethan 40 years ago, Rachel Carson's S<strong>ile</strong>ntSpring fuelled a vigorous public debateabout the use of chemicals in our environmentthat has yet to be resolved."Without this book," wrote former VicePresident Al Gore in the introduct<strong>io</strong>n toa 1994 reprint of it, "the environmentalmovement might have been long delayed ornever have developed at all," This complex,lyrical volume led not only to the banningof DDT but eventually to the format<strong>io</strong>n ofthe US Environmental Protect<strong>io</strong>n Agency."After S<strong>ile</strong>nt Spring,people began tothink about the chemicals they werehandling, what they were doing to theenvironment, and what scientists weren'ttelling them," says Carson b<strong>io</strong>gra<strong>ph</strong>erLinda Lear (Rachel Carson: Witness forNature, 1997). "They began to quest<strong>io</strong>n thevery direct<strong>io</strong>n of technology."Carson had no intent<strong>io</strong>n of starting amovement. Working against time followinga diagnosis of cancer, she sounded herwake-up call in the name of songbirds, "IfI kept s<strong>ile</strong>nt I could never again listen to athrush's song without overwhelming selfreproach,"she wrote. But in the fall of 1962,many scientists and people in the chemicalindustry wished she had kept s<strong>ile</strong>nt.Growing up in western Pennsylvania,Rachel Louise Carson, known to friendsas Ray, immersed herself in nature andbooks, especially the sea sagas of Melvilleand Conrad. At the Pennsylvania Collegefor Women in the mid-1920s she changedher major from English to B<strong>io</strong>logy, butretained a deep love of writing. Eventuallyshe earned a master's degree in MarineZoology from Johns Hopkins Universityand became a jun<strong>io</strong>r aquatic b<strong>io</strong>logist forthe US Bureau of Fisheries in Washington,D.C.Her first book, Under the Sea-Wind,was published in 1941 and sold fewer than2 000 copies. But it put her in contact withscientists who were beginning to ask hardquest<strong>io</strong>ns about the fate of the earth.In the late 1940s, wh<strong>ile</strong> working as publicat<strong>io</strong>nseditor for the Fishand WildlifeService, sheRachel Louise Carson (27 May 1907 —14 April1964) was an American marine b<strong>io</strong>logistand nature writer whose landmark book, S<strong>ile</strong>ntSpring, is often credited with having launched theglobal environmental movement. S<strong>ile</strong>nt Springhad an immense effect in the United States,where it spurred a reversal in nat<strong>io</strong>nal pesticidepolicy. [Photo: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service]began her secondbook, The Sea Around Us. The literarysensat<strong>io</strong>n of 1951— topping best-seller listsand winning a Nat<strong>io</strong>nal Book Award—itoutlined the latest science informingour understanding of the ocean. Carsonalmost instantly became the nat<strong>io</strong>n's unofficialspokesperson for the sea."Heavens!" she wrote a friend after winninganother accolade. "Is this all aboutme—it is really ridiculous!” Sea's successenabled her to become a full-time writerand buy a cottage on the coast of Maine,which would become a sanctuary for therest other life. Wh<strong>ile</strong> she would write anotherbook about the sea, she continued toharbor nagging quest<strong>io</strong>ns about the effectof pesticides on the land.Dichlorodi<strong>ph</strong>enyltrichloroethane(DDT) was first used as an insecticide in1959, just a few grains of the white powderwould miraculously wipe out coloniesof mosquito larvae. During World WarII, B-25 bombers sprayed DDT pr<strong>io</strong>r toinvas<strong>io</strong>ns in the Pacific. After the war,DDT would all but wipe out malaria in thedeveloped world and drastically reduce itelsewhere. (The Nat<strong>io</strong>nal Academy of Sciencesreported in 1970 that DDT had savedmore than 500 mill<strong>io</strong>n lives from malaria.)Paul Muller, the chemist who first turnedit on unsuspecting flies, won a Nobel Prizein 1948 for his work.By the late 1950s, DDT product<strong>io</strong>nhad nearly quintupled from World WarII levels as municipal authorities took tospraying the chemical on American suburbsto eradicate tent caterpillars, gypsymoths and the beetles that carried Dutchelm disease.But the chemical had a disturbing characteristic,it killed indiscriminately. Afterfinding seven dead songbirds in her yard16 B<strong>io</strong><strong>ph</strong><strong>ile</strong> <strong>Issu</strong>e <strong>18</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!