Study of Emergency Response Service (<strong>EMRI</strong> Scheme)With the emerg<strong>in</strong>g significance of the <strong>EMRI</strong> <strong>model</strong> as a preferred option for provid<strong>in</strong>g ERSacross most of the states <strong>in</strong> India, and its <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g support under the NRHM, the M<strong>in</strong>istry ofHealth & Family Welfare, Govt. of India, <strong>in</strong> November 2008, commissioned a review of <strong>EMRI</strong>scheme <strong>in</strong> selected states of Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat and Rajasthan, through the NHSRC.This appraisal would help the M<strong>in</strong>istry of Health & FW, Govt. of India, <strong>in</strong> suggest<strong>in</strong>g replicationand improvement of the programme, and also help build systemic l<strong>in</strong>kages so as to maximisehealth outcomes from this scheme.While assess<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>EMRI</strong> <strong>model</strong>, this review has to address many of the issues that statesgrapple with. One such issue is related to the number of ambulances required to provide anemergency response of quality and another is the estimated case load each of theseambulances would have to deal with. These two issues have major cost implications. Also it isimportant to assess is the unit cost of this service – “per ambulance trip” and “per ambulanceper year”. One would also have to estimate these unit costs for different volumes of utilisationand distances and years of function<strong>in</strong>g. We may estimate that if <strong>EMRI</strong> were adopted by all thestates <strong>in</strong> India with an ambulance density of one ambulance per lakh population (which isrecommended by <strong>EMRI</strong>), we would need around 10,000 ambulances to cover the country. Thecost for this would be Rs. 1700 crores annually (current costs are approximately Rs. 17 lakhsper ambulance per year, tak<strong>in</strong>g both the operational as well as the annualised capital costs).S<strong>in</strong>ce this represents around 10% of current NRHM allocations, the <strong>gov</strong>ernment would need tosatisfy itself that the deliverables are be<strong>in</strong>g achieved <strong>in</strong> the most cost-effective way possible andthe service provider is also accountable for its performance. As <strong>gov</strong>ernment expenditure onNRHM is projected to reach Rs. 55,000 Crores per year by 2012, the ERS cost discussedearlier represents only 3% of it, and this by itself cannot be considered too high a cost forguarantee<strong>in</strong>g comprehensive ERS to all the people of this country. However this is based oncurrent utilisation patterns and density of ambulances deployed. If ris<strong>in</strong>g demand changes thecurrent ground rules, and if the provision with<strong>in</strong> 20 m<strong>in</strong>utes is <strong>in</strong>sisted upon everywhere, thecosts could go up exponentially. There are also possibilities for mak<strong>in</strong>g the system moreefficient 6 , and also estimat<strong>in</strong>g the break-even po<strong>in</strong>t beyond which ris<strong>in</strong>g utilisation will not furtherlower operational costs, even at optimal efficiency.On the service provision side of the ERS, the tie ups with hospitals are also very important <strong>in</strong>this whole scheme as there has to be a l<strong>in</strong>kage with a hospital that will be will<strong>in</strong>g to providehospitalisation care to the poor. The <strong>in</strong>vestment and expenditure <strong>in</strong> transport<strong>in</strong>g the patients to6 The per trip cost is likely to fall with <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> utilization(number of trips per day) and is estimated to stabilizearound Rs. 475/- per trip for an ambulance mak<strong>in</strong>g around 8 trips per day, at current costs/prices. But as the prices offuel and medical consumables are expected to rise further, the unit cost can rise. Also stabilization of unit cost per tripdoesn’t stop the total operat<strong>in</strong>g cost per ambulance per year from ris<strong>in</strong>g, which will rise with the number of trips.National Health Systems Resource Centre (NHSRC)7
Study of Emergency Response Service (<strong>EMRI</strong> Scheme)the hospitals (free, without charg<strong>in</strong>g any fees for transportation) should be proportionate to thecost of provid<strong>in</strong>g the cl<strong>in</strong>ical management <strong>in</strong> the health facility (cost of treatment and theproportion of this, which is free). There are regulatory issues too regard<strong>in</strong>g look<strong>in</strong>g at ERS as aspecialised sub-branch with<strong>in</strong> healthcare and the subsequent accreditation of emergencyparamedical staff.The larger issue is that if ERS becomes an entitlement under the proposed National Health Bill,as <strong>in</strong>deed it should become, then regulation would have a further positive content. That is therole of the state <strong>in</strong> guarantee<strong>in</strong>g universal access to such a service. In this context, both thef<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g of this scheme for different levels of utilisation and the mechanisms of <strong>gov</strong>ernance andaccountability become much more urgentThe appraisal of the <strong>EMRI</strong> scheme was therefore proposed and <strong>in</strong>itiated <strong>in</strong> this context. With<strong>in</strong> afew weeks of constitut<strong>in</strong>g and beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g our work and barely a few days of the first formal<strong>in</strong>terview with the <strong>EMRI</strong>, the crisis occurred <strong>in</strong> Satyam which <strong>in</strong>volved its owner and chiefsponsor of <strong>EMRI</strong>. Though this had few direct implications on the study, the problems of liquiditythat <strong>EMRI</strong> encountered required states to make more advances, and for this purpose they werekeen to know the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs of this study. Also the states on the verge of enter<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to contractsalso started await<strong>in</strong>g these f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs. One immediate implication of this was that the study <strong>in</strong>itiallyplanned as a six month work was now converted <strong>in</strong>to a two phase study- one based on reviewof documents and <strong>in</strong>terviews lead<strong>in</strong>g to a first phase overview report to be followed by a samplestudy and validation of data and a f<strong>in</strong>al report. Though this first phase covers almost all aspectsof the scheme, it is limited by the fact that it is entirely dependent on the secondary data takenfrom the <strong>EMRI</strong>s own reports. Though <strong>EMRI</strong> has been cooperative <strong>in</strong> shar<strong>in</strong>g all the <strong>in</strong>formationwe asked for, our <strong>in</strong>formation is limited to what is collected from them from their <strong>in</strong>ternalmonitor<strong>in</strong>g and analysis systems and there is no <strong>in</strong>dependent validation of this data or primarydata collection.The Objectives of this study could be stated as follows:First Part:1. To exam<strong>in</strong>e and comment on patterns of utilisation of services <strong>in</strong> three sample states tounderstand present and potential demand for these services and the effectiveness of<strong>EMRI</strong> to respond to this2. To review the operational aspects of <strong>EMRI</strong> scheme <strong>in</strong> the sample states of AndhraPradesh, Gujarat and Rajasthan. This would <strong>in</strong>clude operational efficiency of <strong>EMRI</strong>,f<strong>in</strong>ancial management, and management of contractual obligations.National Health Systems Resource Centre (NHSRC)8