- Page 1 and 2: Federal CourtCour fédéraleOttawa,
- Page 3 and 4: TABLE OF CONTENTSPARA.I. Introducti
- Page 5 and 6: G. Accommodation in the Post-Novemb
- Page 7 and 8: Page: 2[5] Also at issue in Air Can
- Page 9 and 10: Page: 4[13] Based upon his years of
- Page 11 and 12: Page: 6[22] Both complaints were re
- Page 13 and 14: Page: 8Tribunal’s decision as it
- Page 15: Page: 10[37] The Tribunal observed
- Page 19 and 20: Page: 14[53] There is also no dispu
- Page 21 and 22: Page: 16the Charter. By failing to
- Page 23 and 24: Page: 18impaired the relevant right
- Page 25 and 26: Page: 20workers were compensated fo
- Page 27 and 28: Page: 22The Supreme Court found tha
- Page 29 and 30: Page: 24[93] With this in mind, Jus
- Page 31 and 32: Page: 26[100] Our legal system oper
- Page 33 and 34: Page: 28observed in her dissenting
- Page 35 and 36: Page: 30[116] Further, as I observe
- Page 37 and 38: Page: 32[124] There is a further co
- Page 39 and 40: Page: 34[132] However, as the Ontar
- Page 41 and 42: Page: 36[139] Where earlier Supreme
- Page 43 and 44: Page: 38[148] There have been devel
- Page 45 and 46: Page: 40[156] These circumstances f
- Page 47 and 48: Page: 42have abolished mandatory re
- Page 49 and 50: Page: 44[170] The arbitrator’s se
- Page 51 and 52: Page: 46[178] As noted earlier, the
- Page 53 and 54: Page: 48i) The Section 1 Analytical
- Page 55 and 56: Page: 50requires a consideration of
- Page 57 and 58: Page: 52[198] The Tribunal further
- Page 59 and 60: Page: 54[206] At this stage of the
- Page 61 and 62: Page: 56retirement to be imposed up
- Page 63 and 64: Page: 58[221] As the Supreme Court
- Page 65 and 66: Page: 60legislatures have struck a
- Page 67 and 68:
Page: 62[236] Air Canada’s expert
- Page 69 and 70:
Page: 64question the assumption und
- Page 71 and 72:
Page: 66[251] Dr. Kesselman confirm
- Page 73 and 74:
Page: 68choose to continue working.
- Page 75 and 76:
Page: 70[267] However, Dr. Kesselma
- Page 77 and 78:
Page: 72need the money. Those who w
- Page 79 and 80:
Page: 74[283] While Chief Justice M
- Page 81 and 82:
Page: 76for the accommodation of th
- Page 83 and 84:
Page: 78requirements. As a conseque
- Page 85 and 86:
Page: 80Gunderson and Pesando entit
- Page 87 and 88:
Page: 82employment arrangements inv
- Page 89 and 90:
Page: 84assisted employers in manag
- Page 91 and 92:
Page: 8615(1)(c) of the CHRA and th
- Page 93 and 94:
Page: 88[334] The Tribunal rejected
- Page 95 and 96:
Page: 90[343] Indeed, the majority
- Page 97 and 98:
Page: 92[351] For the reasons given
- Page 99 and 100:
Page: 94[358] As to the scope of th
- Page 101 and 102:
Page: 962006. Six Sigma is a busine
- Page 103 and 104:
Page: 98[376] The Tribunal also fou
- Page 105 and 106:
Page: 100agreement would affect oth
- Page 107 and 108:
Page: 102[392] It is true that the
- Page 109 and 110:
Page: 104[400] That is, while the q
- Page 111 and 112:
Page: 106ICAO standards. Air Canada
- Page 113 and 114:
Page: 108ii)The Accommodation of Mr
- Page 115 and 116:
Page: 110[424] The evidence before
- Page 117 and 118:
Page: 112company about three months
- Page 119 and 120:
Page: 114[441] The major focus of C
- Page 121 and 122:
Page: 116[450] For example, Captain
- Page 123 and 124:
Page: 118Duke explained why a sched
- Page 125 and 126:
Page: 120ii)The Tribunal’s Findin
- Page 127 and 128:
Page: 122[474] Messrs. Vilven and K
- Page 129 and 130:
Page: 124[482] I have concluded tha
- Page 131 and 132:
Page: 126memorandum of fact and law
- Page 133 and 134:
Page: 128JUDGMENTTHIS COURT ORDERS
- Page 135 and 136:
Page: 2agreement relate to the indi
- Page 137 and 138:
FEDERAL COURTSOLICITORS OF RECORDDO
- Page 139 and 140:
COURT OF APPEAL FOR BRITISH COLUMBI
- Page 141 and 142:
Health Sciences Assoc. of B.C. v. C
- Page 143 and 144:
Health Sciences Assoc. of B.C. v. C
- Page 145 and 146:
Health Sciences Assoc. of B.C. v. C
- Page 147 and 148:
Health Sciences Assoc. of B.C. v. C
- Page 149 and 150:
Health Sciences Assoc. of B.C. v. C
- Page 151 and 152:
Health Sciences Assoc. of B.C. v. C
- Page 153 and 154:
Health Sciences Assoc. of B.C. v. C
- Page 155 and 156:
Health Sciences Assoc. of B.C. v. C
- Page 157 and 158:
Health Sciences Assoc. of B.C. v. C
- Page 159 and 160:
Health Sciences Assoc. of B.C. v. C
- Page 161 and 162:
Health Sciences Assoc. of B.C. v. C
- Page 163 and 164:
Date: July 9, 2004File: 348Indexed
- Page 165 and 166:
[7] Myert contracts with provincial
- Page 167 and 168:
- Proportional client case manageme
- Page 169 and 170:
scrutinizing closely, the contract
- Page 171 and 172:
[29] Two New Moons fell on work day
- Page 173 and 174:
and based on the last paragraph of
- Page 175 and 176:
I understand that I am still in my
- Page 177 and 178:
terminate his employment due to his
- Page 179 and 180:
searches in December 2002, which wa
- Page 181 and 182:
[65] I find that Mr. Derksen has es
- Page 183 and 184:
[71] Finally, I cannot find that My
- Page 185 and 186:
complainant as a result of contrave
- Page 187 and 188:
Other Orders[84] Mr. Derksen seeks
- Page 189 and 190:
Canadian HumanRights TribunalTribun
- Page 191 and 192:
I. COMPLAINT[1] This complaint aros
- Page 193 and 194:
3[12] Previous to the hearing, the
- Page 195 and 196:
5[22] Jason also worked regularly s
- Page 197 and 198:
7III.RESPONDENT’S OPERATIONS[33]
- Page 199 and 200:
9building on the air field where sm
- Page 201 and 202:
11consideration of the nature of
- Page 203 and 204:
13been described by her then superi
- Page 205 and 206:
15c) The bulk of employees in the C
- Page 207 and 208:
17b) “In addition to programming
- Page 209 and 210:
19V. COMPLAINANT’S CASEA. Evidenc
- Page 211 and 212:
21Hence, while the Respondent is pr
- Page 213 and 214:
23Ms. Gerstl, and would not allow h
- Page 215 and 216:
25[109] Under cross-examination, Ms
- Page 217 and 218:
27[120] Mr. Star also testified to
- Page 219 and 220:
29[129] Mr. Star confirmed that at
- Page 221 and 222:
31shifts as of right when her circu
- Page 223 and 224:
33[149] There has been a phenomenal
- Page 225 and 226:
35- workers are less engaged with l
- Page 227 and 228:
37worker’s sense of control and h
- Page 229 and 230:
39[178] Complainant’s counsel cha
- Page 231 and 232:
41have also increased for families.
- Page 233 and 234:
43referral, hiring, promotion, trai
- Page 235 and 236:
45[210] The interpretation that ‘
- Page 237 and 238:
47[219] This Tribunal does not find
- Page 239 and 240:
49[230] Both parties rely on their
- Page 241 and 242:
51not discrimination found in any g
- Page 243 and 244:
53VI.RESPONDENT’S CASEA. Evidence
- Page 245 and 246:
55approximately 14 weeks. There is
- Page 247 and 248:
57[270] When asked under cross-exam
- Page 249 and 250:
59[281] However, Mr. Sheridan ackno
- Page 251 and 252:
61[293] Mr. Sheridan responded that
- Page 253 and 254:
63[299] There was no one called as
- Page 255 and 256:
6515 people at any given time, or 4
- Page 257 and 258:
67[324] CBSA’s approach upon rece
- Page 259 and 260:
69[335] The one question relied upo
- Page 261 and 262:
71the U.S. So, whereas in the U.S.
- Page 263 and 264:
73could accommodate Ms. Johnstone
- Page 265 and 266:
75b) Ms. Johnstone has demonstrated
- Page 267 and 268:
77contributions as a full-time empl
- Page 269 and 270:
79[385] However, by a decision rend
- Page 271 and 272:
CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNALPARTI
- Page 273 and 274:
INTRODUCTION[1] Raymond Jones is on
- Page 275 and 276:
eligious requirements by scheduling
- Page 277 and 278:
[18] In the last couple of years, t
- Page 279 and 280:
Bible-trained conscience would be i
- Page 281 and 282:
Did the Respondents refuse to conti
- Page 283 and 284:
further, there is nothing to sugges
- Page 285 and 286:
[47] Section 37(2)(d)(ii) of the Co
- Page 287 and 288:
first year at Menzies he received n
- Page 289:
• That the Respondents Cornelius
- Page 351 and 352:
INTRODUCTION[1] Darshan Pannu works
- Page 353 and 354:
[9] For their part, Skeena and the
- Page 355 and 356:
elevated hydrogen sulfide concentra
- Page 357 and 358:
[27] As a result of complaints by a
- Page 359 and 360:
[37] However, his back condition di
- Page 361 and 362:
[45] Mr. Pannu alleges that Skeena
- Page 363 and 364:
(2) Protective respiratory equipmen
- Page 365 and 366:
condition can drive safely. That is
- Page 367 and 368:
emergency procedure that the Compla
- Page 369 and 370:
[75] I can see no justification for
- Page 371 and 372:
tacitly approved a less than accept
- Page 373 and 374:
would impose some cost on Skeena. I
- Page 375 and 376:
time and because those people are l
- Page 377 and 378:
[104] The evidence before me establ
- Page 379 and 380:
[110] Since Skeena has established
- Page 381 and 382:
TABLE OF CONTENTSPageI. INTRODUCTIO
- Page 383 and 384:
2A. The Facts(i)The Canadian Nation
- Page 385 and 386:
4CMC. Ms. Storms occupied that posi
- Page 387 and 388:
6[26] The work schedule of a Conduc
- Page 389 and 390:
8It is this provision that allows C
- Page 391 and 392:
10[44] Because she was hired after
- Page 393 and 394:
12[54] Ms. Storms also testified th
- Page 395 and 396:
14[64] She also testified that CN c
- Page 397 and 398:
16not have to cover the shortage in
- Page 399 and 400:
18November 13 th , he started train
- Page 401 and 402:
20Tribunal to identify any legislat
- Page 403 and 404:
22accurate” and she added that
- Page 405 and 406:
24[101] There was no response from
- Page 407 and 408:
26supervisor the result would have
- Page 409 and 410:
28[116] On cross-examination, Ms. S
- Page 411 and 412:
30[125] On February 16 th , 2006, M
- Page 413 and 414:
32A railway is, by its nature, a tw
- Page 415 and 416:
34[132] Section 7 states :7. It is
- Page 417 and 418:
36(ii)The Lawa) The prima facie cas
- Page 419 and 420:
38strike that balance coupled with
- Page 421 and 422:
40duty or obligation” and that th
- Page 423 and 424:
42apply the Hoyt approach. In Chant
- Page 425 and 426:
44the Complainant’s “parental p
- Page 427 and 428:
46January at the latest.” (para.
- Page 429 and 430:
48c) Has a prima facie case of disc
- Page 431 and 432:
50CN’s other witnesses could not
- Page 433 and 434:
52Has CN established that it could
- Page 435 and 436:
54[189] The evidence establishes th
- Page 437 and 438:
56[196] The evidence also indicates
- Page 439 and 440:
58[202] Once the door is opened, th
- Page 441 and 442:
60about the policy and that if she
- Page 443 and 444:
62iii. Is it necessary to have all
- Page 445 and 446:
64person is assessed according to h
- Page 447 and 448:
66At the most, according to Cathy S
- Page 449 and 450:
68(iii)Compensation for lost wages[
- Page 451 and 452:
70“child care issue”. They felt
- Page 453 and 454:
CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNALPARTI
- Page 455 and 456:
TABLE OF CONTENTSPageI. INTRODUCTIO
- Page 457 and 458:
2A. The Facts(i)The Canadian Nation
- Page 459 and 460:
4[15] When an employee is working o
- Page 461 and 462:
6eventually disappear altogether. T
- Page 463 and 464:
8an employee of CN until her employ
- Page 465 and 466:
10(iv)The Conductors recalled to co
- Page 467 and 468:
12evidence confirming that this was
- Page 469 and 470:
14(v)The Complainant’s recall to
- Page 471 and 472:
16the same difficulties with childc
- Page 473 and 474:
18during a meeting where various to
- Page 475 and 476:
20[81] Mr. Broshko was not called a
- Page 477 and 478:
22[87] Section 10 of the Act provid
- Page 479 and 480:
24[1999] 3 S.C.R. 3 (“Meiorin”)
- Page 481 and 482:
26118 This Tribunal has considered
- Page 483 and 484:
28wrong in law.” (Johnstone, supr
- Page 485 and 486:
30[106] In Falardeau v. Ferguson Mo
- Page 487 and 488:
32Employees, (2006) 88 C.L.A.S. 212
- Page 489 and 490:
34[118] The Tribunal also disagrees
- Page 491 and 492:
36[125] The Tribunal concludes that
- Page 493 and 494:
38[131] CN’s justification for de
- Page 495 and 496:
40terminals. Employees hired after
- Page 497 and 498:
42868 (Grismer), at para. 31). Empl
- Page 499 and 500:
44[150] The evidence clearly establ
- Page 501 and 502:
46vi. Have other parties who are ob
- Page 503 and 504:
48followed in this case and that
- Page 505 and 506:
50complaint of discrimination based
- Page 507 and 508:
52that she be reinstated in her emp
- Page 509 and 510:
54reasonable to conclude therefore
- Page 511 and 512:
56involved in this case decided tha
- Page 513 and 514:
CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNALPARTI
- Page 515 and 516:
- 2 -Evangelical Fellowship of Cana
- Page 517 and 518:
- 4 -demolition. The application wa
- Page 519 and 520:
- 6 -Here, the impugned stipulation
- Page 521 and 522:
- 8 -Whether one can waive a consti
- Page 523 and 524:
- 10 -in relation to one another wh
- Page 525 and 526:
- 12 -The obligation imposed on the
- Page 527 and 528:
- 14 -By Iacobucci J.Referred to: R
- Page 529 and 530:
- 16 -Canadian Charter of Rights an
- Page 531 and 532:
- 18 -1 An important feature of our
- Page 533 and 534:
- 20 -festival, which begins in lat
- Page 535 and 536:
- 22 -Co-owners may not decorate, p
- Page 537 and 538:
- 24 -16 Each of the appellants non
- Page 539 and 540:
- 26 -also satisfied that, contrary
- Page 541 and 542:
- 28 -concluded that the accommodat
- Page 543 and 544:
- 30 -of succahs on the balconies o
- Page 545 and 546:
- 32 -Quebec Charter or under the C
- Page 547 and 548:
- 34 -purpose of s. 2(a) is to ensu
- Page 549 and 550:
- 36 -commands of their common fait
- Page 551 and 552:
- 38 -determining, either explicitl
- Page 553 and 554:
- 40 -55 This approach to freedom o
- Page 555 and 556:
- 42 -60 At this stage, as a genera
- Page 557 and 558:
- 44 -B. Application to the Facts(1
- Page 559 and 560:
- 46 -mandated “obligation” to
- Page 561 and 562:
- 48 -the significance of a strict
- Page 563 and 564:
- 50 -77 Similarly, a communal succ
- Page 565 and 566:
- 52 -82 Against the appellants’
- Page 567 and 568:
- 54 -maximize human rights invaria
- Page 569 and 570:
- 56 -persuaded that the purported
- Page 571 and 572:
- 58 -“did not read these provisi
- Page 573 and 574:
- 60 -Succot, subject to the undert
- Page 575 and 576:
- 62 -6.16 EXTERIOR DECORATIONS PRO
- Page 577 and 578:
- 64 -[TRANSLATION] . . . practisin
- Page 579 and 580:
- 66 -reserved for exclusive use to
- Page 581 and 582:
- 68 -the building’s style and it
- Page 583 and 584:
- 70 -129 Regarding the third step
- Page 585 and 586:
- 72 -The essence of the concept of
- Page 587 and 588:
- 74 -137 In light of the foregoing
- Page 589 and 590:
- 76 -(M. Tancelin, “L’acte uni
- Page 591 and 592:
- 78 -142 Although any analysis of
- Page 593 and 594:
- 80 -of Quebec (C.C.Q., preliminar
- Page 595 and 596:
- 82 -in enacting s. 9.1, as eviden
- Page 597 and 598:
- 84 -Charter involves finding a ba
- Page 599 and 600:
- 86 -159 The appellants submit tha
- Page 601 and 602:
- 88 -as it does not bar the appell
- Page 603 and 604:
- 90 -emergency routes will be comp
- Page 605 and 606:
- 92 -access routes too much if cer
- Page 607 and 608:
- 94 -would amount to an impairment
- Page 609 and 610:
- 96 -178 The appellants contend th
- Page 611 and 612:
- 98 -erection on the communally ow
- Page 613 and 614:
- 100 -Charter of Rights and Freedo
- Page 615 and 616:
- 102 -(Journal des débats: Commis
- Page 617 and 618:
- 104 -Can one waive his or her rig
- Page 619 and 620:
- 106 -198 In my view, the “reaso
- Page 621 and 622:
- 108 -[TRANSLATION]Q. You said ear
- Page 623 and 624:
- 110 -denial of construction of th
- Page 625 and 626:
- 112 -11. A succah in the garden h
- Page 627 and 628:
CITATION: VILVEN V. AIR CANADA, 200
- Page 629 and 630:
the shared meaning of the English a
- Page 631 and 632:
451, (1990), 52 B.C.L.R. (2d) 105,
- Page 633 and 634:
(i) Mandatory retirement at Air Can
- Page 635 and 636:
[7] It should also be noted at the
- Page 637 and 638:
[25] In contrast, Mr. Kelly’s hum
- Page 639 and 640:
first officers. While noting that c
- Page 641 and 642:
3. Was there a “normal age of ret
- Page 643 and 644:
at the very heart of a free and dem
- Page 645 and 646:
situation of pilots working in Cana
- Page 647 and 648:
[114] The fact that other Canadian
- Page 649 and 650:
[132] Firstly, as Air Canada has no
- Page 651 and 652:
[151] In contrast, the French versi
- Page 653 and 654:
of relevant positions. As the Tribu
- Page 655 and 656:
[189] Before turning to discuss the
- Page 657 and 658:
and Harrison, and paragraph 15(1)(c
- Page 659 and 660:
working beside them is paid more th
- Page 661 and 662:
Rather, it is the permissive provis
- Page 663 and 664:
treatment is as between workers und
- Page 665 and 666:
(ii) The degree of correspondence b
- Page 667 and 668:
[296] In Lavoie, Justice Bastarache
- Page 669 and 670:
the law to university professors ov
- Page 671 and 672:
constitutionally protected right, t
- Page 673 and 674:
colour, religion, age, sex, sexual
- Page 675 and 676:
Canadian HumanRights TribunalTribun
- Page 677 and 678:
2D. Conclusion on Seniority .......
- Page 679 and 680:
2II.Cease and Desist Order[3] The c
- Page 681 and 682:
4defence to any other outstanding o
- Page 683 and 684:
6A. Vilven[22] For the purpose of d
- Page 685 and 686:
8seniority to transfer to Toronto a
- Page 687 and 688:
10knowing that they will be frozen
- Page 689 and 690:
12[54] Kelly provided two calculati
- Page 691 and 692:
14earned about $5,000 a month. Sinc
- Page 693 and 694:
16[77] Kelly said he also made some
- Page 695 and 696:
18VI.Pain and SufferingA. Vilven[88
- Page 697 and 698:
20complainants continued with Air C
- Page 699 and 700:
22retired at some point in the near
- Page 701 and 702:
24(ii)Kelly[117] As to Kelly’s se
- Page 703 and 704:
26[127] Air Canada seeks to support
- Page 705 and 706:
28[138] In Martin, the Supreme Cour
- Page 707 and 708:
30[150] For the Supreme Court in Hy
- Page 709 and 710:
32[161] Thus the respondents argue,
- Page 711 and 712:
34F. Conclusion on Previous Financi
- Page 713 and 714:
369) Air Canada is to pay fifty per
- Page 715 and 716:
APPENDIX II2010 CHRT 27 (CaPay Rate
- Page 717 and 718:
Canadian HumanRights TribunalTribun
- Page 719 and 720:
I. INTRODUCTION[1] This is an emplo
- Page 721 and 722:
3described by the Complainant’s c
- Page 723 and 724:
5The training takes from four (4) t
- Page 725 and 726:
7available for work, but if he or s
- Page 727 and 728:
9back to their home residence at re
- Page 729 and 730:
11nature of the father’s work mak
- Page 731 and 732:
13[57] Due to its location, the Van
- Page 733 and 734:
15(iv)The Conductors recalled to co
- Page 735 and 736:
17August 12 th . He works from that
- Page 737 and 738:
19When asked by CN counsel why he h
- Page 739 and 740:
21[88] Employee QR was covering a s
- Page 741 and 742:
23[96] In CN’s Amended Statement
- Page 743 and 744:
25[105] On cross-examination, the C
- Page 745 and 746:
27Vancouver. On cross-examination h
- Page 747 and 748:
29[121] The Complainant also testif
- Page 749 and 750:
31at the end of May or in the first
- Page 751 and 752:
33schedule. She was asking, in effe
- Page 753 and 754:
35B. ISSUES[139] The issue raised i
- Page 755 and 756:
37differential manner and was termi
- Page 757 and 758:
39117 Discrimination on this ground
- Page 759 and 760:
41[154] In Johnstone, the Federal C
- Page 761 and 762:
43approach in Campbell River. For e
- Page 763 and 764:
45discrimination set out in the CHR
- Page 765 and 766:
47the complaint and that no jurispr
- Page 767 and 768:
49[178] In February 2005, the Compl
- Page 769 and 770:
51equally and fully in employment w
- Page 771 and 772:
53[191] The use of the term “undu
- Page 773 and 774:
55[198] The evidence clearly establ
- Page 775 and 776:
57[205] CN “Accommodation Guideli
- Page 777 and 778:
59had trained its managers well eno
- Page 779 and 780:
61[219] She further testified that
- Page 781 and 782:
63[224] To meet the procedural comp
- Page 783 and 784:
65the situation in the present case
- Page 785 and 786:
67[238] The Tribunal has referred i
- Page 787 and 788:
69(iii)Compensation for lost wages[
- Page 789 and 790:
71speaking to the Complainant, what
- Page 791:
CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNALPARTI