Composite Training Unit Exercises and Joint Task ... - Govsupport.us

Composite Training Unit Exercises and Joint Task ... - Govsupport.us Composite Training Unit Exercises and Joint Task ... - Govsupport.us

govsupport.us
from govsupport.us More from this publisher
08.07.2015 Views

COMPTUEX/JTFEX EA/OEA Final Chapter 3Federal Requirements – The USEPA is responsible for enforcing the Clean Air Act (CAA) of 1970, asamended (1977 and 1990) (42 U.S.C. Section 7401 et seq.). Specific geographic areas are classified aseither “attainment” or “nonattainment” areas for each criteria pollutant based upon the comparison ofmeasured data with the NAAQS and state standards. If data are incomplete, or do not support aclassification of attainment or nonattainment, then an area may be considered “unclassified” for thatpollutant.The USEPA requires each state to prepare a State Implementation Plan (SIP) that describes how that statewill achieve compliance with the NAAQS. Section 176(c) of the CAA, the General Conformity Rule,requires Federal agencies to ensure that actions undertaken in nonattainment or maintenance areas areconsistent with the applicable SIP. In order to demonstrate conformity with the CAA, a project mustclearly demonstrate that it does not: 1) cause or contribute to any new violation of any standard in anyarea; 2) increase the frequency or severity of any existing violation of any standard in any area; or 3)delay timely attainment of any standard, required interim emission reductions, or other milestones.Compliance with the General Conformity Rule is presumed if the emissions associated with the Federalaction are below the de minimis emission levels for the region in which the action is proposed.State Requirements – The CAA allows individual states to adopt ambient air quality standards and otherregulations provided they are at least as stringent as Federal standards. The proposed action includesparticipants from three individual states: California, Nevada, and Arizona. The following sectionsprovide a discussion of specific state requirements for these states.California – In California, the SIP consists of separate elements for each air basin. The California CleanAir Act of 1988 (26 California Health and Safety Code Section 1000 et seq.) established CaliforniaAmbient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS) for the seven criteria pollutants regulated by the USEPA, aswell as additional standards for sulfates, hydrogen sulfide, vinyl chloride, and visibility reducing particles.The California Air Resource Board (CARB) is the agency responsible for enforcing regulations designedto achieve and maintain the CAAQS. The CARB has delegated authority to local air quality managementdistricts to manage development of separate elements of the SIP for the air basin under their jurisdiction,and to adopt and enforce rules and regulations arising from the SIP and from State and Federalregulations. The CARB requires that each of the air districts in California develop its own strategy forachieving compliance with the NAAQS and CAAQS, but maintains regulatory authority over thesestrategies, as well as regulating mobile source emissions throughout the state.Nevada – The State of Nevada is divided into three jurisdictions, which manage their own air programsby designation of the Nevada State Legislature. Air quality programs for the rural areas of the state aremanaged by the Nevada Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Division of EnvironmentalProtection. The urban areas of the state are managed by the Clark County Department of Air QualityManagement (Las Vegas), and the Washoe County District Health Department, Air Quality ManagementDivision (Reno). Statewide Air Quality Standards are established by the Nevada Code, Chapter445B.22097 (Standards of Quality for Ambient Air).Arizona – The Air Quality Division of the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)administers the state’s air quality program from the Division’s main office and two regional offices. Theprogram is designed to enforce requirements based on the NAAQS. The ADEQ has not adopted morestringent state ambient air quality standards.State and Federal Air Quality Standards are shown in Table 3.1-1.February 2007 3-2

COMPTUEX/JTFEX EA/OEA Final Chapter 3PollutantOzone (O3) 6CarbonMonoxide (CO)Nitrogen Dioxide(NO2)Sulfur Dioxide(SO2)Averaging Time1-HourTable 3.1-1. Ambient Air Quality StandardsNAAQS 1 NAAQS 1 CAAQS 2 NSQAA 10Primary 3 Secondary 4 Concentration 5 Concentration 50.12 parts per million(ppm) (235 microgramsper cubic meter [g/m 3 ])Same asPrimary Standard0.09 ppm (180 g/m 3 )0.12 parts per million (ppm) (235g/m 3 )8-Hour 0.08 ppm 0.070 ppm (137 g/m 3 ) note 7 0.08 ppm8-Hour 9 ppm (10 mg/m 3 ) None 9.0 ppm (10 g/m 3 )9 ppm (10 mg/m 3 ) less than5000’ above MSL; 6 ppm (7mg/m 3 ) greater than 5000’ aboveMSL1-Hour 35 ppm (40 mg/m 3 ) 20 ppm (23 g/m 3 ) 35 ppm (40 mg/m 3 )Annual Average 0.053 ppm (100 g/m 3 )Same asPrimary Standard- 0.053 ppm (100 g/m 3 )1-Hour - 0.25 ppm (470 g/m 3 ) -Annual Average 80 g/m 3 (0.03 ppm) - - 80 g/m 3 (0.03 ppm)24-Hour 365 g/m 3 (0.14 ppm) - 0.04 ppm (105 g/m 3 ) 365 g/m 3 (0.14 ppm)3-Hour - 1300 g/m 3 (0.5 ppm) - 0.5 ppm (1300 g/m 3 )1-Hour - - 0.25 ppm (655 g/m 3 ) -SuspendedSame as24-Hour 150 g/m 350 g/mPrimary Standard3 150 g/mParticulate3Matter (PM10) Annual Arithmetic Mean 50 g/m 3 20 g/m 3 note 8 50 g/m 3Fine ParticulateMatter (PM2.5) 624-Hour 65 g/m 3Same asPrimary Standard- 65 g/m 3Annual Arithmetic Mean 15 g/m 3 12 g/m 3 note 8 15 g/m 330-Day Average - - 1.5 g/m 3 -Lead (Pb) 9 Calendar Quarter 1.5 g/m 3Hydrogen Sulfide(HS)Same asPrimary Standard- 1.5 g/m 31-Hour 0.03 ppm (42 g/m 3 ) 0.08 ppm (112 g/m 3 )Sulfates (SO4) 24-Hour 25 g/m 3 No Nevada StandardVisibilityReducingParticles8-Hour(10 am to 6 pm, PacificStandard Time)No Federal StandardsIn sufficient amount toproduce an extinctioncoefficient of 0.23 perkilometer due to particleswhen the relative humidityis less than 70 percent.No Nevada StandardVinyl chloride 924 Hour0.01 ppm (26 g/m 3 ) No Nevada Standardμg/m 3 = milligrams per cubic meterSource: CARB 2005a, USEPA 2005a1NAAQS (other than O 3 , particulate matter, and those based on annual averages or annual arithmetic mean) are not to be exceeded more than once a year. The O 3standard is attained when the fourth highest 8-hour concentration in a year, averaged over 3 years, is equal to or less than the standard. For PM 10 , the 24-hour standardis attained when 99 percent of the daily concentrations, averaged over 3 years, are equal to or less than the standard. For PM 2.5 , the 24-hour standard is attained when98 percent of the daily concentrations, averaged over 3 years, are equal to or less than the standard. Contact the USEPA for clarification and current Federal policies.2 California Ambient Air Quality Standards for O 3 , CO (except Lake Tahoe), SO 2 (1- and 24-hour), NO 2 , PM 10 , and visibility reducing particles, are values that are notto be exceeded. All others are not to be equaled or exceeded.3 National Primary Standards: The levels of air quality necessary, with an adequate margin of safety, to protect the public health.4 National Secondary Standards: The levels of air quality necessary to protect the public welfare from any known or anticipated adverse effects of a pollutant.5 Concentration expressed first in units in which it was promulgated. Ppm in this table refers to ppm by volume or micromoles of pollutant per mole of gas.6 New Federal 8-hour ozone and fine particulate matter standards were promulgated by USEPA on 18 July 1997. The Federal 1-hour O 3 standard was revoked on July15, 2005, but is the basis for currently adopted SIPs On 15 April 2004 the USEPA issued attainment designations for the 8-hour standard and described plans for thephase out of the 1-hour standard (USEPA 2004a).7 Approved by the Air Resources Board on April 28, 2005 and expected to become effective in early 2006.8 On 5 June 2003, the Office of Administrative Law approved the amendments to the regulations for the State ambient air quality standards for particulate matter andsulfates. Those amendments established a new annual average standard for PM 2.5 of 12 g/m 3 and reduced the level of the annual average standard for PM 10 to 20g/m 3 . The approved amendments were filed with the Secretary of State on 5 June 2003. The regulations became effective on 5 July 2003.9 The CARB has identified lead and vinyl chloride as ‘toxic air contaminants’ with no threshold level of exposure for adverse health effects determined. These actionsallow for the implementation of control measures at levels below the ambient concentrations specified for these pollutants.10 Nevada Standards of Quality for Ambient Air.3-3 February 2007

COMPTUEX/JTFEX EA/OEA Final Chapter 3Federal Requirements – The USEPA is responsible for enforcing the Clean Air Act (CAA) of 1970, asamended (1977 <strong>and</strong> 1990) (42 U.S.C. Section 7401 et seq.). Specific geographic areas are classified aseither “attainment” or “nonattainment” areas for each criteria pollutant based upon the comparison ofmeasured data with the NAAQS <strong>and</strong> state st<strong>and</strong>ards. If data are incomplete, or do not support aclassification of attainment or nonattainment, then an area may be considered “unclassified” for thatpollutant.The USEPA requires each state to prepare a State Implementation Plan (SIP) that describes how that statewill achieve compliance with the NAAQS. Section 176(c) of the CAA, the General Conformity Rule,requires Federal agencies to ensure that actions undertaken in nonattainment or maintenance areas areconsistent with the applicable SIP. In order to demonstrate conformity with the CAA, a project m<strong>us</strong>tclearly demonstrate that it does not: 1) ca<strong>us</strong>e or contribute to any new violation of any st<strong>and</strong>ard in anyarea; 2) increase the frequency or severity of any existing violation of any st<strong>and</strong>ard in any area; or 3)delay timely attainment of any st<strong>and</strong>ard, required interim emission reductions, or other milestones.Compliance with the General Conformity Rule is presumed if the emissions associated with the Federalaction are below the de minimis emission levels for the region in which the action is proposed.State Requirements – The CAA allows individual states to adopt ambient air quality st<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>and</strong> otherregulations provided they are at least as stringent as Federal st<strong>and</strong>ards. The proposed action includesparticipants from three individual states: California, Nevada, <strong>and</strong> Arizona. The following sectionsprovide a disc<strong>us</strong>sion of specific state requirements for these states.California – In California, the SIP consists of separate elements for each air basin. The California CleanAir Act of 1988 (26 California Health <strong>and</strong> Safety Code Section 1000 et seq.) established CaliforniaAmbient Air Quality St<strong>and</strong>ards (CAAQS) for the seven criteria pollutants regulated by the USEPA, aswell as additional st<strong>and</strong>ards for sulfates, hydrogen sulfide, vinyl chloride, <strong>and</strong> visibility reducing particles.The California Air Resource Board (CARB) is the agency responsible for enforcing regulations designedto achieve <strong>and</strong> maintain the CAAQS. The CARB has delegated authority to local air quality managementdistricts to manage development of separate elements of the SIP for the air basin under their jurisdiction,<strong>and</strong> to adopt <strong>and</strong> enforce rules <strong>and</strong> regulations arising from the SIP <strong>and</strong> from State <strong>and</strong> Federalregulations. The CARB requires that each of the air districts in California develop its own strategy forachieving compliance with the NAAQS <strong>and</strong> CAAQS, but maintains regulatory authority over thesestrategies, as well as regulating mobile source emissions throughout the state.Nevada – The State of Nevada is divided into three jurisdictions, which manage their own air programsby designation of the Nevada State Legislature. Air quality programs for the rural areas of the state aremanaged by the Nevada Department of Conservation <strong>and</strong> Natural Resources, Division of EnvironmentalProtection. The urban areas of the state are managed by the Clark County Department of Air QualityManagement (Las Vegas), <strong>and</strong> the Washoe County District Health Department, Air Quality ManagementDivision (Reno). Statewide Air Quality St<strong>and</strong>ards are established by the Nevada Code, Chapter445B.22097 (St<strong>and</strong>ards of Quality for Ambient Air).Arizona – The Air Quality Division of the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)administers the state’s air quality program from the Division’s main office <strong>and</strong> two regional offices. Theprogram is designed to enforce requirements based on the NAAQS. The ADEQ has not adopted morestringent state ambient air quality st<strong>and</strong>ards.State <strong>and</strong> Federal Air Quality St<strong>and</strong>ards are shown in Table 3.1-1.February 2007 3-2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!