08.07.2015 Views

Composite Training Unit Exercises and Joint Task ... - Govsupport.us

Composite Training Unit Exercises and Joint Task ... - Govsupport.us

Composite Training Unit Exercises and Joint Task ... - Govsupport.us

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CD-086-06, Navy <strong>Training</strong> <strong>Exercises</strong>Southern CaliforniaPage 38maintains a public website depicting upcoming restrictions in designated Danger Zonesaround SCI. These notices detail date, time duration, <strong>and</strong> location of restricted access,so that commercial <strong>and</strong> private fishermen <strong>and</strong> divers can plan their activitiesaccordingly. The restricted times only extend through the duration of the trainingactivity; thereby allowing the public to shift their activities to alternate areas duringtemporary closures. Th<strong>us</strong>, the Proposed Action would be consistent with Section30234.5 to the maximum extent practicable.The Navy’s proposal is consistent with the Coastal Act policies that provide for balancingmaximum public access in a manner consistent with public safety <strong>and</strong> military security needs.In past reviews, the Commission has found that absent a nex<strong>us</strong> such as intensifications ofpublic access closures, no new public access requirements are normally required. For theproposed exercises, the public area closures during the exercises, which are clearly necessaryfor both public safety <strong>and</strong> military needs, are similar to past closures from similar Navy testing.The proposal may even reduce closures, as one of the Navy’s goals is to schedule morefrequent simultaneo<strong>us</strong>ly occurring exercises than previo<strong>us</strong>ly scheduled. The Commissionconcludes that the existing military restrictions are necessary <strong>and</strong> consistent with Coastal Actpolicies, that the Navy is not proposing greater numbers or durations of closures, <strong>and</strong> that theproject is consistent with the public access, recreation, <strong>and</strong> fishing policies (Sections 30210,30212, 30234, <strong>and</strong> 30234.5) of the Coastal Act.V. SUBSTANTIVE FILE DOCUMENTS:1. Navy Consistency Determinations CD-20-95 (Navy San Clemente Isl<strong>and</strong> CableRepair), CD-109-98 (Navy Advanced Deployable System (ADS) Ocean Tests), CD-95-97 <strong>and</strong> CD-153-97 (Navy, Low-Frequency Active (LFA) Sonar Research, Phases I <strong>and</strong>II), CD-2-01 (Navy Point Mugu Sea Range testing <strong>and</strong> training activities), CD-045-89<strong>and</strong> CD-50-03 (Navy FOCUS Cable <strong>and</strong> Cable repairs, San Nicolas Isl<strong>and</strong>), <strong>and</strong> CD-37-06 (Navy Monterey Bay (MB) 06).2. Isl<strong>and</strong> Night Lizard, 5-Year Review, U.S. Fish <strong>and</strong> Wildlife Service.3. San Clemente Isl<strong>and</strong> Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan (INRMP), Navy,May 2002.4. USGS Seismic Survey Consistency Determinations No. CD-14-02, CD-16-00 <strong>and</strong> CD-32-99.5. Mobil Oil Pier <strong>and</strong> Wharf Decommissioning (Coastal Development Permit (CDP) No.E-96-14).6. Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute (MBARI) (CDP No. E-05-007/ConsistencyCertification No. CC-076-05).7. Consistency Determination No. CD-102-99, National Marine Fisheries Service, smalltest of “pulsed power” aco<strong>us</strong>tic harassment device to protect recreational fishing fromsea lions.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!