08.07.2015 Views

Composite Training Unit Exercises and Joint Task ... - Govsupport.us

Composite Training Unit Exercises and Joint Task ... - Govsupport.us

Composite Training Unit Exercises and Joint Task ... - Govsupport.us

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

COMPTUEX/JTFEX EA/OEA Final Chapter 4INRMP <strong>and</strong> other environmental requirements. Therefore, no significant impacts to terrestrial biologicalresources would occur as a result of implementation of the No Action Alternative or Proposed Action.4.3.2.2 Summary of Regulatory Framework4.3.2.2.1 Sikes Act Improvement Act (SAIA)The Sikes Act of 1960, 16 U.S.C. 670a-670o, as amended by the Sikes Act Improvement Act of 1997,Pub. L. No. 105-85, requires, at Section 101 (a), military installations, except those without significantnatural resources, to prepare <strong>and</strong> implement integrated plans. All Department of the Navy <strong>and</strong> <strong>Unit</strong>edStates Army installation training areas where COMPTUEX/JTFEX activities will take place, have anIntegrated Natural Resources Management Plan (INRMP). COMPTUEX/JTFEX activities will beimplemented in accordance with the management <strong>and</strong> conservation criteria developed within eachINRMP. Where a plan remains to be developed or updated, the action proponent will comply with allapplicable law for the protection of natural resources found on the installation or operating area.4.3.2.2.2 Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA)The Migratory Bird Treaty Act, 16 U.S.C. 703-711, directs the U.S. Fish <strong>and</strong> Wildlife Service (USFWS)to ensure the perpetuation of migratory bird populations <strong>and</strong> their habitat. The Department of Defense,pursuant to the 2003 National Defense Authorization Act, is allowed to incidentally take migratory birdsduring military readiness training activities.Section 315 of the Authorization Act also provided that the Secretary of the Interior would prescriberegulations for the Armed Forces for the incidental taking of migratory birds during military readinessactivities authorized by the Secretary of Defense. During the interim period while the regulations arebeing developed, incidental take which may occur by implementation of the proposed action, is notsubject to the take provisions within the MBTA. While the final rule implementing Congress' m<strong>and</strong>ate isexpected to be promulgated soon, the proposed action is not expected to present adverse impacts onmigratory birds or a population of migratory birds species.4.3.2.2.3 Endangered Species Act (ESA)Section 7 of the ESA requires all Federal agencies to <strong>us</strong>e their authorities to conduct conservationprograms <strong>and</strong> to consult with NMFS or USFWS concerning the potential effects of their actions on anyspecies listed under the ESA. The purpose of consultation is to avoid, minimize, or mitigate the impactsof their activities on listed species. The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) of 2004 (H.R.1588) addresses the designation of critical habitat on DoD l<strong>and</strong>s that are subject to an INRMP, whilereaffirming the obligation of DoD to comply with Section 9 of the ESA to prevent extinction <strong>and</strong> takingof endangered <strong>and</strong> threatened species.The Navy has determined that COMPTUEX/JTFEX activities at San Clemente Isl<strong>and</strong>, Naval BaseCoronado, <strong>and</strong> MCB Camp Pendleton are consistent with terms <strong>and</strong> conditions of existing BOs.Therefore, no re-initiation of Section 7 consultation with USFWS is required. COMPTUEX/JTFEXactivities on these installations would adhere to st<strong>and</strong>ard operating procedures developed in accordancewith INRMPs <strong>and</strong> existing BOs.4.3.2.2.4 National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) <strong>and</strong> Executive Order 12114Based on the analyses presented in this section including the analyses <strong>and</strong> compliance with otherregulations, the No Action <strong>and</strong> the Proposed Action will not significantly impact or significantly harmterrestrial resources.February 2007 4-82

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!