08.07.2015 Views

Composite Training Unit Exercises and Joint Task ... - Govsupport.us

Composite Training Unit Exercises and Joint Task ... - Govsupport.us

Composite Training Unit Exercises and Joint Task ... - Govsupport.us

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

COMPTUEX/JTFEX EA/OEA Final Chapter 44.3.1.8 Summary of Regulatory Framework4.3.1.8.1 Endangered Species Act (ESA)The EA/OEA analyzes potential effects to species listed under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). Inaccordance with ESA requirements, the Navy completed consultation under Section 7 of the ESA with theNational Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) on the potential that COMPTUEX/JTFEX activities mayaffect listed species in the action area. In concluding the Section 7 consultation, NMFS issued aBiological Opinion (BO) (February 9, 2007) finding that conduct of the JTFEX <strong>and</strong> COMPTUEX mayaffect but are not likely to adversely affect the white abalone (Haliotis sorenseni), four sea turtles(loggerhead [Caretta caretta], leatherback [Dermochelys coriacea], eastern Pacific green [Cheloniaagassizi], <strong>and</strong> olive ridley [Lepidochelys olivacea]), listed fish (Chinook salmon [Oncorhynch<strong>us</strong>tshawytscha], steelhead [Oncorhynch<strong>us</strong> mykiss], <strong>and</strong> green sturgeon [Acipenser medirostris]), the NorthPacific right whale (Eubalaena japonica), the Southern Resident killer whale (Orcin<strong>us</strong> orca), or theStellar sea lion (Eumetopias jubat<strong>us</strong>). The opinion further concludes that conduct of these exercises willnot likely result in fitness consequences for the blue whale (Balaenoptera m<strong>us</strong>cul<strong>us</strong>) <strong>and</strong> is not likely tojeopardize the continued existence of the fin whale (Balaenoptera physal<strong>us</strong>), the sei whale (Balaenopteraborealis), the humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae), the sperm whale (Physeter macrocephal<strong>us</strong>) orthe Guadalupe fur seal (Arctocephal<strong>us</strong> townsendi). In addition, NMFS issued the Navy an incidental takestatement requiring terms <strong>and</strong> conditions to be implemented in order to be exempt from the prohibitionsof Section 9 of the ESA. In accordance with these terms <strong>and</strong> conditions the Navy will implement“measures to reduce the probability of exposing” any endangered mammals, implement a monitoringprogram in association with COMPTUEX/JTFEX to evaluate assumptions contained in the BiologicalOpinion, <strong>and</strong> to provide NMFS with reports (verbal <strong>and</strong> written) regarding the observed marine mammalsduring the exercises. L<strong>and</strong>-based activities will be conducted in accordance with existing biologicalopinions. Based on receipt of the BO, the Navy concludes that no significant impacts to Federally-listedspecies will occur as a result of COMPTUEX/JTFEX.4.3.1.8.2 Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA)No incidental harassment of marine mammals is expected as a result of underwater detonations. Thepredicted incidents of harassment from the aco<strong>us</strong>tic modeling were considered in the context of themitigation measures in Chapter 5. As a result, takes of marine mammals associated with underwaterdetonations are not reasonably foreseeable.As a result of aco<strong>us</strong>tic effects associated with mid-frequency active sonar <strong>us</strong>e, the proposed action mayresult in incidental Level B harassment of 23 species of marine mammals. By Navy policy developed inconjunction with NMFS, modeled Level B harassment of beaked whale species are considered aspotential Level A harassment. In addition, common dolphins may be exposed to Level A harassmentfrom mid-frequency active sonar. Mitigation measures are expected to be effective in reducing thepotential for Level A harassment. No serio<strong>us</strong> injury or mortality of any marine mammal species isreasonably foreseeable. No adverse effects on the annual rates of recruitment or survival of any of thespecies <strong>and</strong> stocks assessed in this document are expected as a result of the estimated incidents of Level B<strong>and</strong> very limited estimated Level A harassment. In addition, the mitigation measures presented inChapter 5 result in the action having the least practicable adverse impact on species or stocks.Title 16 <strong>Unit</strong>ed States Code, Section 1371(f) of the MMPA provides that [t]he Secretary of Defense, afterconferring with the Secretary of Commerce, the Secretary of the Interior or both as appropriate, mayexempt any action or category of actions undertaken by the Department of Defense or its componentsfrom compliance with any requirement of this chapter, if the Secretary determines that it is necessary for4-79 February 2007

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!