08.07.2015 Views

Composite Training Unit Exercises and Joint Task ... - Govsupport.us

Composite Training Unit Exercises and Joint Task ... - Govsupport.us

Composite Training Unit Exercises and Joint Task ... - Govsupport.us

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

COMPTUEX/JTFEX EA/OEA Final Chapter 4hearing from 0.5 to 160 kHz with maximum sensitivity between 29 <strong>and</strong> 123 kHz Kastelein et al., 2003).There is no information on the response of striped dolphins exposed to anthropogenic sounds butbottlenose dolphins exposed to mid-frequency sonar sounds in a laboratory setting had an increase inheart rate (Miksis et al., 2001) <strong>and</strong> a change in their trained behaviors such as moving away from or notreturning to the sound source station (Schlundt et al., 2000, Finneran et al., 2005).The exposures depicted in Table 4.3-28 would not necessarily occur to 1,626 different individuals. Thesame individual could experience behavioral disruption more than once over the course of a year,particularly if the animal is resident in the area of the range. Th<strong>us</strong>, the estimated number of individualstriped dolphins experiencing Level B harassment may be fewer than 1,626. Mitigation measures detailedin Chapter 5 would further reduce the potential for any effect on striped dolphins. The Navy thereforeconcludes that the proposed action would not affect annual rates of recruitment or survival for stripeddolphins, <strong>and</strong> would not have a significant impact on this species <strong>and</strong> stock.Modeling results indicate that striped dolphins are not reasonably expected to be exposed to aco<strong>us</strong>ticenergy in excess of onset-TTS from single, point source detonations. The Level A zone of influence ofthe largest detonations (MK 83) extends to 1,000 yards from the source. Implementation of protectivemeasures listed in Chapter 5 will ensure effective mitigation such that this species would not be exposedto incidental Level A or Level B harassment.Ziphiid Beaked WhalesThe Longman’s beaked whale is not listed as endangered under the ESA, <strong>and</strong> the Hawaiian Stock is notconsidered to be strategic under the MMPA. The population estimate for the Hawaiian Stock is 766(CV=1.05) individuals (Carretta et al., 2005). The modeling efforts <strong>and</strong> harassment analysis for midfrequencyactive sonar estimate that no Level A harassment of Ziphiid beaked whales would occur. Theanalysis estimates that up to 49 incidents of non-injurio<strong>us</strong> behavioral <strong>and</strong> 3 non-injurio<strong>us</strong> physiologicalharassment (Level B harassment) may be experienced by Ziphiid beaked whales on annual basis (Table4.3-29). Although modeling predicts non-injurio<strong>us</strong> Level B exposures, all beaked whale exposures arecounted as Level A. No Ziphiid beaked whales would be exposed to impulsive noise or pressures fromunderwater detonations that would ca<strong>us</strong>e TTS or physical injury.Table 4.3-29. Raw Annual Aco<strong>us</strong>tic Model Output of Ziphiid Beaked WhaleBehavioral173-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!