08.07.2015 Views

Composite Training Unit Exercises and Joint Task ... - Govsupport.us

Composite Training Unit Exercises and Joint Task ... - Govsupport.us

Composite Training Unit Exercises and Joint Task ... - Govsupport.us

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

COMPTUEX/JTFEX EA/OEA Final Chapter 4sensitive than other cetaceans to low frequency sounds; however, as noted earlier, there is no directevidence to support this idea (MacLeod 1999).The exposures depicted in Table 4.3-12 would not necessarily occur to 4 different individuals. The sameindividual could experience behavioral disruption more than once over the course of a year, particularly ifthe animal is resident in the area of the range. Th<strong>us</strong>, the estimated number of individual Baird’s whalesexperiencing harassment may be fewer than four. Mitigation measures detailed in Chapter 5 wouldfurther reduce the potential for any effect on Baird’s whales. The Navy therefore concludes that theproposed action would not affect annual rates of recruitment or survival for Baird’s whales, <strong>and</strong> wouldnot have a significant impact on this species <strong>and</strong> stock.Bottlenose Dolphin California Coastal <strong>and</strong> Offshore Stock (Tursiops truncat<strong>us</strong>)The bottlenose dolphin is not listed as endangered under the ESA. In southern California, twopopulations occur: a coastal population within 0.5 nm (0.9 km) of shore <strong>and</strong> a larger offshore population(Hansen, 1990). There is a minimum population estimate of 186 (CV=0.12) for the California CoastalStock of the bottlenose dolphin, <strong>and</strong> 3,053 (CV=0.66) for the California/Oregon/Washington OffshoreStock (Carretta et al., 2005). Neither stock is considered depleted or strategic under the MMPA. Themodeling efforts <strong>and</strong> harassment analysis for mid-frequency active sonar estimate that no Level Aharassment of bottlenose dolphins would occur. The analysis estimates that up to 516 incidents of noninjurio<strong>us</strong>behavioral harassment (Level B harassment) may be experienced by bottlenose dolphins onannual basis (Table 4.3-13). Based on the distance of mid-frequency sonar activities from shore, allexposures are estimated to occur to the Offshore Stock, with no predicted exposure of the CaliforniaCoastal Stock of Bottlenose Dolphins. No bottlenose dolphins would be exposed to impulsive noises orpressures from underwater detonations that would ca<strong>us</strong>e TTS or physical injury.Table 4.3-13. Raw Annual Aco<strong>us</strong>tic Model Output of Bottlenose DolphinBehavioral173-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!