Composite Training Unit Exercises and Joint Task ... - Govsupport.us

COMPTUEX/JTFEX EA/OEA Final Chapter 4The exposures depicted in Table 4.3-10 would not necessarily occur to 64 different individuals. The sameindividual could experience behavioral disruption more than once over the course of a year, particularly ifthe animal is resident in the area of the range. Thus, the estimated number of individual gray whalesexperiencing Level B harassment may be fewer than 64. Mitigation measures detailed in Chapter 5would further reduce the potential for any effect on gray whales. The Navy therefore concludes that theproposed action would not affect annual rates of recruitment or survival for gray whales, and would nothave a significant impact on this species and stock.Minke Whale (Balaenoptera acutorostrata)The minke whale is not listed as endangered under the ESA, and the California/Oregon/ WashingtonStock and is not considered depleted or strategic under the MMPA. They occur year-round off California(Dohl et al. 1983; Barlow 1995; Forney et al. 1995). The minke whales found in waters off California,Oregon, and Washington appear to be resident in that area, and to have home ranges, whereas thosefarther north are migratory. The population abundance for offshore California, Oregon, and Washingtonas a whole was estimated to be 585 (CV=0.73) individuals (Carretta et al. 2005). The modeling effortsand harassment analysis for mid-frequency active sonar estimate that no Level A harassment of minkewhales would occur. The analysis estimates that up to 24 incidents of non-injurious behavioralharassment (Level B harassment) may be experienced by minke whales on annual basis (Table 4.3-11).No minke whales would be exposed to impulsive noise or pressures from underwater detonations thatwould cause TTS or physical injury.Table 4.3-11. Raw Annual Acoustic Model Output of Minke WhaleBehavioral173-