08.07.2015 Views

National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife ... - All About Birds

National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife ... - All About Birds

National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife ... - All About Birds

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Hispanics, who represent a growingpercentage <strong>of</strong> the U.S population,hunted at a much lower rate than non-Hispanics. One percent <strong>of</strong> all Hispanicshunted in 2011 compared to 6 percent<strong>of</strong> non-Hispanics. The 271 thous<strong>and</strong>Hispanics who hunted in 2011 made up2 percent <strong>of</strong> all hunters.2001–2011 Comparison <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hunting</strong>ActivityThe number <strong>of</strong> hunters increased9 percent from 2006 to 2011. Otheranimal hunters increased 92 percentin number <strong>and</strong> the other types <strong>of</strong>hunting stayed level at the 95 percentlevel <strong>of</strong> significance. Total days <strong>of</strong>hunting went up 28 percent, primarilydue to a 29 percent increase in biggame hunting days. Other animalhunting days also went up significantly.Trip-related, equipment, <strong>and</strong>other expenditures went up 29 percent.Trip-related expenditures increased 39percent, equipment expenditures didnot increase significantly, <strong>and</strong> otherexpenditures such as l<strong>and</strong> leasing <strong>and</strong>owning went up 40 percent.Comparing 2001 <strong>and</strong> 2011 estimatesreveals no statistically significantchange in the number <strong>of</strong> overallhunters, but does show increases inthe number <strong>of</strong> days <strong>and</strong> expenditures.Small game hunting participantnumbers went down, while otheranimal participant numbers went up.Days <strong>of</strong> big game <strong>and</strong> other animalhunting went up significantly, whilesmall game <strong>and</strong> migratory bird huntingdays did not have a significant change.Turning to expenditures, the comparisonis similar to 2006–2011. Overallexpenditures went up, with trip-related<strong>and</strong> other items undergoing an increase<strong>and</strong> equipment staying level.The across-the-board increases in2011 hunting participation, day, <strong>and</strong>expenditure estimates run counter tothe downward trends documented inthe preceding three FHWAR <strong>National</strong><strong>Survey</strong>s. From 1991 to 2006, huntingparticipation had dropped 11 percent<strong>and</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> hunting days had notsignificantly changed. The 9 percentparticipant <strong>and</strong> 28 percent day increasesputs the 2011 hunting status on par withthat <strong>of</strong> 1991 hunting, the high point <strong>of</strong>hunting in the last twenty years.Number <strong>of</strong> Hunters(Millions)Days <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hunting</strong>(Millions)<strong>Hunting</strong> Expenditures(Billions <strong>of</strong> 2011 dollars)$33.0$26.2 $25.528213.0 12.513.7 228 22020012006201120012006201120012006201132 2011 <strong>National</strong> <strong>Survey</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fishing</strong>, <strong>Hunting</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>Wildlife</strong>-Associated Recreation U.S. Fish <strong>and</strong> <strong>Wildlife</strong> Service <strong>and</strong> U.S. Census Bureau

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!