<strong>Hunting</strong> on Public <strong>and</strong> PrivateL<strong>and</strong>smillion hunters, 23 percent, hunted onboth public <strong>and</strong> private l<strong>and</strong>s.<strong>of</strong> all hunters pursued other animals onpublic l<strong>and</strong> for over 5 million days.In 2011, 13.7 million hunters 16 yearsold <strong>and</strong> older hunted on public l<strong>and</strong>,private l<strong>and</strong>, or both. Of this number,4.9 million or 36 percent hunted onpublicly owned l<strong>and</strong>s compared to 11.5million or 84 percent who hunted onprivately owned l<strong>and</strong>. Some huntershunted exclusively on public l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong>others hunted exclusively on privatel<strong>and</strong>—1.7 million, 13 percent <strong>of</strong> allhunters, used public l<strong>and</strong>s only, <strong>and</strong> 8.4million hunted only on private l<strong>and</strong>,61 percent <strong>of</strong> all hunters. Nearly 3.2During 2011, 4.9 million hunters usedpublic l<strong>and</strong>s on 61 million days, whichrepresents 22 percent <strong>of</strong> all huntingdays. Thirty-three percent <strong>of</strong> big gamehunters pursued big game on publicl<strong>and</strong> for 39 million days. Thirty-onepercent <strong>of</strong> all small game hunters, 1.4million, pursued small game on publicl<strong>and</strong> for 14 million days. An estimated923 thous<strong>and</strong> migratory bird hunters,36 percent, hunted migratory birdson public l<strong>and</strong>s for 8 million days.Twenty-four percent, 523 thous<strong>and</strong>,Percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>All</strong> <strong>Hunting</strong> in State <strong>of</strong> Residence <strong>and</strong> in Other States(Total: 13.7 million participants)In state <strong>of</strong> residence<strong>and</strong> other states8%In other states only6%In state <strong>of</strong> residence only86%The percent <strong>of</strong> hunters on private l<strong>and</strong>is similar among different types <strong>of</strong>hunting. Eighty-four percent <strong>of</strong> biggame hunters hunted on private l<strong>and</strong>,which compares to 83 percent seekingsmall game, 77 percent seeking migratorybirds, <strong>and</strong> 87 percent seeking otheranimals.Of all days hunting, 78 percent or219 million were on private l<strong>and</strong>. Thepercent <strong>of</strong> hunting days on private l<strong>and</strong>varied slightly more among types <strong>of</strong>hunting than the percent <strong>of</strong> hunters.Seventy-nine percent <strong>of</strong> big gamehunting days, 73 percent <strong>of</strong> small gamehunting days, 57 percent <strong>of</strong> migratorybird hunting days, <strong>and</strong> 79 percent<strong>of</strong> other animal days were on privatel<strong>and</strong>. Total hunting days pursuing thesespecies on private l<strong>and</strong> were as follows:big game 167 million, small game 37million, migratory bird 13 million, <strong>and</strong>other animals 27 million.Participation in Target ShootingPeople <strong>Hunting</strong> on Public <strong>and</strong> Private L<strong>and</strong>sUndetermined0.4 millionIn preparation for hunting, 7.2 millionhunters, 52 percent <strong>of</strong> all hunters, wenttarget shooting. Twenty-two percent <strong>of</strong>all hunters, 2.9 million, used shootingranges. The most commonly used firearmsat a shooting range were shotguns<strong>and</strong> rifles (2.3 million hunters) <strong>and</strong>h<strong>and</strong>guns (1.1 million).Public <strong>and</strong> private3.2 millionPrivate only8.4 millionPublic only1.7 millionNumber <strong>of</strong> Hunters Who Target Shoot <strong>and</strong> Use Shooting Ranges(Total hunters: 13.7 million)Target shooting in preparation for hunting7.2 millionUsed shooting ranges2.9 million28 2011 <strong>National</strong> <strong>Survey</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fishing</strong>, <strong>Hunting</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>Wildlife</strong>-Associated Recreation U.S. Fish <strong>and</strong> <strong>Wildlife</strong> Service <strong>and</strong> U.S. Census Bureau
Sex <strong>and</strong> AgeOf the U.S. population 16 years old<strong>and</strong> older, 11 percent <strong>of</strong> the males<strong>and</strong> 1 percent <strong>of</strong> the females enjoyedhunting in 2011. Of the 13.7 millionparticipants who hunted, 89 percent(12.2 million) were male <strong>and</strong> 11percent (1.5 million) were female.Percent <strong>of</strong> Males <strong>and</strong> Females Who Hunted in the United StatesMales 11%Females 1%The participation rate in huntingtended to increase with age until individualsreached 65 years <strong>of</strong> age, <strong>and</strong>thereafter it declined. During 2011,5 percent or 419 thous<strong>and</strong> 16- <strong>and</strong>17-year-olds hunted. The participationrate was also 5 percent for 18- to24-year olds <strong>and</strong> 25- to 34-year olds.The participation rate climbed to 6percent for 35- to 44-year olds, <strong>and</strong>then to 7 percent for 45- to 54-yearolds <strong>and</strong> 55- to 64-year olds. People 65<strong>and</strong> older had a participation rate <strong>of</strong> 4percent. However, <strong>of</strong> the 65 <strong>and</strong> olderage group, those who were 65 to 74years <strong>of</strong> age had a 5 percent huntingparticipation rate, while those whowere 75 <strong>and</strong> older had a 2 percent rate.The age group that contributed themost hunters was 45 to 54 years old.<strong>About</strong> 3.1 million hunters, which was23 percent <strong>of</strong> all hunters, were 45 to54. Individuals 55 to 64 years old wereclose in total number <strong>of</strong> hunters at 2.8million.Females11%16 <strong>and</strong> 173%18 to 249%25 to 3415%35 to 4418%Percent <strong>of</strong> Hunters by SexPercent <strong>of</strong> Hunters by AgeMales89%65 <strong>and</strong> older11%55 to 6421%45 to 5423%Hunters by Sex <strong>and</strong> AgeTotal, both sexes ... 13.7 millionMale ........... 12.2 millionFemale ......... 1.5 millionPercent <strong>of</strong> U.S. Population Who Hunted by Age16 <strong>and</strong> 17 5%18 to 245%Total, all ages ..... 13.7 million16 <strong>and</strong> 17 ....... 0.4 million18 to 24 ........ 1.3 million25 to 34 ........ 2.1 million35 to 44 ........ 2.4 million45 to 54 ........ 3.1 million55 to 64 ........ 2.8 million65 <strong>and</strong> older ..... 1.5 millionSource: Table 10.25 to 3435 to 4445 to 5455 to 6465 <strong>and</strong> older5%6%7%7%4%U.S. Fish <strong>and</strong> <strong>Wildlife</strong> Service <strong>and</strong> U.S. Census Bureau 2011 <strong>National</strong> <strong>Survey</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fishing</strong>, <strong>Hunting</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>Wildlife</strong>-Associated Recreation 29
- Page 1: U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service2011Nat
- Page 4 and 5: Economics and StatisticsAdministrat
- Page 6 and 7: List of TablesFishing and Hunting1.
- Page 8 and 9: ForewordWhen I was growing up, it w
- Page 11 and 12: Highlights
- Page 13 and 14: watching (observing, photographing,
- Page 15 and 16: Expenditures for Wildlife-Related R
- Page 17 and 18: Fishing
- Page 19 and 20: Fishing ExpendituresAnglers spent $
- Page 21 and 22: Freshwater Fishing ExpendituresAngl
- Page 23 and 24: pike, pickerel, and muskie, as well
- Page 25 and 26: Sex and Age of AnglersAlthough more
- Page 27 and 28: The majority of anglers had househo
- Page 29: 2001-2011 Fishing Participants, Day
- Page 32 and 33: Hunting HighlightsIn 2011, 13.7 mil
- Page 34 and 35: Big Game HuntingIn 2011, a majority
- Page 36 and 37: Days per hunterTrips per hunterTrip
- Page 40 and 41: Large MSA25%Medium MSA17%Percent of
- Page 42 and 43: Hispanics, who represent a growingp
- Page 45 and 46: Wildlife WatchingU.S. Fish and Wild
- Page 47 and 48: Wildlife-Watching ExpendituresThirt
- Page 49 and 50: Wildlife Fed, Observed, orPhotograp
- Page 51 and 52: Metropolitan and NonmetropolitanAro
- Page 53 and 54: Education, Race, and Ethnicity ofAr
- Page 55 and 56: Away-From-Home Participantsby Type
- Page 57 and 58: Away-From-Home WildlifeWatchers by
- Page 59 and 60: Metropolitan and NonmetropolitanAwa
- Page 61 and 62: 2001-2011 Comparison of Wildlife-Wa
- Page 63: 2006-2011 Wildlife-Watching Partici
- Page 66 and 67: Guide to Statistical TablesPurpose
- Page 68 and 69: Table 3. Freshwater Anglers and Day
- Page 70 and 71: Table 7. Hunters and Days of Huntin
- Page 72 and 73: Table 8. Selected Characteristics o
- Page 74 and 75: Table 9. Selected Characteristics o
- Page 76 and 77: Table 10. Selected Characteristics
- Page 78 and 79: Table 12. Expenditures for Fishing:
- Page 80 and 81: Table 14. Trip and Equipment Expend
- Page 82 and 83: Table 16. Trip and Equipment Expend
- Page 84 and 85: Table 18. Trip and Equipment Expend
- Page 86 and 87: Table 20. Trip and Equipment Expend
- Page 88 and 89:
Table 22. Special Equipment Expendi
- Page 90 and 91:
Table 25. Freshwater Anglers and Da
- Page 92 and 93:
Table 29. Hunters and Days of Hunti
- Page 94 and 95:
Table 33. Hunters Preparing for Hun
- Page 96 and 97:
Table 37. Participation in Wildlife
- Page 98 and 99:
Table 40. Expenditures for Wildlife
- Page 100 and 101:
Table 41. Selected Characteristics
- Page 102 and 103:
Table 42. Selected Characteristics
- Page 104 and 105:
Table 46. Total Wildlife-Related Pa
- Page 106 and 107:
Appendix A.DefinitionsAnnual househ
- Page 108 and 109:
State governments (such as State pa
- Page 110 and 111:
Appendix B.2010 Participation of 6-
- Page 112 and 113:
Table B-4. Most Recent Year of Fish
- Page 114 and 115:
Table B-7. Selected Characteristics
- Page 116 and 117:
Table B-9. Participation by 6-to-15
- Page 118 and 119:
Appendix C.Significant Methodologic
- Page 120 and 121:
Table C-1. Major Characteristics of
- Page 122 and 123:
Table C-2. Anglers and Hunters by C
- Page 124 and 125:
household income in the 2001Survey.
- Page 126 and 127:
Table C-4. Comparison of Major Find
- Page 128 and 129:
Table C-5. Anglers and Hunters by C
- Page 130 and 131:
Appendix D.Sample Design and Statis
- Page 132 and 133:
lation 6 to 15 years of age were de
- Page 134 and 135:
compute in advance the standard err
- Page 136 and 137:
Illustration of the Computation of
- Page 138 and 139:
Table D-2. Approximate Standard Err
- Page 140 and 141:
Table D-4. Approximate Standard Err
- Page 143:
U.S. Department of the InteriorU.S.