Days per anglerComparative <strong>Fishing</strong> by Type <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fishing</strong>11121716<strong>All</strong> fishingFreshwater except Great LakesGreat LakesSaltwaterComparative <strong>Fishing</strong> HighlightsIn 2011, anglers spent an average <strong>of</strong>17 days fishing <strong>and</strong> took an average <strong>of</strong>14 fishing trips. Freshwater, non-GreatLakes anglers averaged 16 days fishing<strong>and</strong> 13 trips while Great Lakes anglersaveraged 12 days fishing <strong>and</strong> 9 trips.Saltwater anglers fished fewer days onaverage, 11, <strong>and</strong> averaged 10 trips.Trips per anglerTrip expendituresper anglerTrip expendituresper day$39$30$55$749101314Selected Fish by Type <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fishing</strong>(In millions)Type <strong>of</strong> fishing$494$658$655Anglers DaysFreshwater except Great Lakes, total .................. 27.1 443Black bass ....................................... 10.6 171Panfish . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.3 97Trout. ........................................... 7.2 76Catfish/bullhead ................................... 7.0 96Crappie. ......................................... 6.1 102White bass, striped bass, <strong>and</strong> striped bass hybrids. ........ 4.4 61Great Lakes, total. .................................. 1.7 20Walleye, sauger ................................... 0.6 6Black bass ....................................... 0.6 5Perch ........................................... 0.5 6Salmon .......................................... 0.4 5Northern pike, pickerel, muskie, muskie hybrids ......... *0.2 *2Lake trout. ....................................... *0.2 *4Saltwater, total ..................................... 8.9 99Striped bass ...................................... 2.1 18Flatfish (flounder, halibut) ........................... 2.0 22Red drum (redfish). ................................ 1.5 21Sea trout (weakfish) ................................ 1.1 15Bluefish ......................................... 1.0 10Salmon .......................................... 0.7 4* Estimate based on a sample size <strong>of</strong> 10–29.Source: Tables 3, 4, <strong>and</strong> 5.$824Overall, anglers spent an average <strong>of</strong>$1,262 on fishing-related expenses in2011. They averaged $658 per anglerfor their trip-related costs, a dailyaverage <strong>of</strong> $39. Freshwater anglers,excluding the Great Lakes, averaged$494 per participant for their tripsin 2011, equaling $30 per day. GreatLakes anglers spent an average <strong>of</strong>$655 on trip-related expenses, $55 perday. Saltwater anglers experienced thehighest average expenditure amount at$824, an average <strong>of</strong> $74 per day.<strong>Fishing</strong> for Selected FishThe most popular fish species amongthe 27.1 million anglers who fishedfreshwater, other than the Great Lakes,was black bass. More than 10.6 millionparticipants spent 171 million daysfishing for black bass. Panfish weresought by 7.3 million anglers on 97million days. Trout fishing attracted7.2 million anglers on 76 million days.Catfish <strong>and</strong> bullheads drew 7.0 millionanglers on 96 million days. Over 6.1million anglers fished for crappie on102 million days. Nearly 4.4 millionanglers fished for white bass <strong>and</strong>striped bass on 61 million days. Freshwateranglers also commonly fished forwalleye, northern pike, sauger, salmon,<strong>and</strong> steelhead.In 2011, 1.7 million anglers fishedthe Great Lakes. Walleye <strong>and</strong> sauger,the most commonly sought fish forthese waters, attracted 584 thous<strong>and</strong>anglers, fishing nearly 6 million days.Black bass attracted 559 thous<strong>and</strong>anglers who fished for them 5 milliondays. Perch, another popular fish, wasfished for by 497 thous<strong>and</strong> anglersfor 6 million days. Salmon drew 379thous<strong>and</strong> anglers for almost 3 milliondays <strong>of</strong> fishing. Great Lakes anglersalso commonly fished for northern12 2011 <strong>National</strong> <strong>Survey</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fishing</strong>, <strong>Hunting</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>Wildlife</strong>-Associated Recreation U.S. Fish <strong>and</strong> <strong>Wildlife</strong> Service <strong>and</strong> U.S. Census Bureau
pike, pickerel, <strong>and</strong> muskie, as well assteelhead <strong>and</strong> lake trout.Among the nearly 8.9 million saltwateranglers, 2.1 million fished forstriped bass for 18 million days. Twomillion anglers fished for flatfish, whichincludes flounder <strong>and</strong> halibut, on 22million days. Also popular were reddrum (redfish) <strong>and</strong> sea trout (weakfish)with 1.5 million <strong>and</strong> 1.1 million anglerswho fished for 21 million <strong>and</strong> 15million days, respectively. Other prominentsaltwater species sought weremackerel with 650 thous<strong>and</strong> anglers,tuna with 564 thous<strong>and</strong> anglers, <strong>and</strong>mahi mahi (dolphinfish) with 538thous<strong>and</strong> anglers.Participation by Geographic RegionIn 2011, 239 million people 16 yearsold <strong>and</strong> older lived in the United States<strong>and</strong> 1 in 7 <strong>of</strong> these U.S. residents wentfishing. While the national participationrate was 14 percent, the regional ratesranged from 9 percent in the Pacific to23 percent in the West North CentralRegion. The West North Central, EastNorth Central, East South Central, WestSouth Central, <strong>and</strong> Mountain Regionsall reported participation rates abovethe national rate. The Middle Atlantic,South Atlantic, New Engl<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong>Pacific Regions fell below the nationalrate.<strong>Fishing</strong> in State <strong>of</strong> Residence <strong>and</strong>in Other StatesA large majority <strong>of</strong> the 33.1 millionanglers who fished in 2011 did sowithin their home state. Approximately30.0 million participants, 91 percent <strong>of</strong>all anglers, fished in their resident state.Nearly 7.0 million, 21 percent, fishedout-<strong>of</strong>-state. Percentages do not add to100 because those anglers who fishedboth in-state <strong>and</strong> out-<strong>of</strong>-state wereincluded in both categories.Of the 27.1 million non-Great Lakesanglers, 92 percent, 24.9 million, fishedwithin their resident state. Over 4.5million, 17 percent, <strong>of</strong> these freshwateranglers fished out-<strong>of</strong>-state.Ninety-two percent, 1.5 million, <strong>of</strong> allGreat Lakes anglers enjoyed fishingPacific9%HICAAKORWANVwithin their home state in 2011. Thirteenpercent, 224 thous<strong>and</strong>, <strong>of</strong> all GreatLakes anglers fished out-<strong>of</strong>-state.Of the three different types <strong>of</strong> fishing,saltwater fishing had both the highestpercentage <strong>of</strong> anglers fishing outsidetheir resident state, 31 percent, <strong>and</strong> thelowest percentage fishing within theirresident state, 74 percent. Nonresidentsaltwater anglers numbered 2.8 million<strong>and</strong> resident anglers 6.6 million.IDAZ<strong>Fishing</strong> Participation(<strong>National</strong> participation rate: 14 percent)UTMountain15%MTWYNMCOWest NorthCentral23%NDSDNETXKSOKMNWest SouthCentral16%IAMOARLAWIILMSEastNorthCentral16%INTNMIALKYOHEast SouthCentral17%GAWVSCFLPAVANCNYNHVTNew Engl<strong>and</strong>12%MEMARICTNJDEMDDCSouth Atlantic13%Percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>All</strong> <strong>Fishing</strong> in State <strong>of</strong> Residence <strong>and</strong> in Other States(Total: 33.1 million participants)In state <strong>of</strong> residence only79%MiddleAtlantic11%In state <strong>of</strong> residence <strong>and</strong>other states12%In other states only9%<strong>Fishing</strong> in State <strong>of</strong> Residence<strong>and</strong> in Other States(In millions)Out <strong>of</strong>In state stateTotal anglers ...... 30.0 7.0Freshwater exceptGreat Lakes ... 24.9 4.5Great Lakes ..... 1.5 0.2Saltwater ....... 6.6 2.8Source: Table 2.U.S. Fish <strong>and</strong> <strong>Wildlife</strong> Service <strong>and</strong> U.S. Census Bureau 2011 <strong>National</strong> <strong>Survey</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fishing</strong>, <strong>Hunting</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>Wildlife</strong>-Associated Recreation 13
- Page 1: U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service2011Nat
- Page 4 and 5: Economics and StatisticsAdministrat
- Page 6 and 7: List of TablesFishing and Hunting1.
- Page 8 and 9: ForewordWhen I was growing up, it w
- Page 11 and 12: Highlights
- Page 13 and 14: watching (observing, photographing,
- Page 15 and 16: Expenditures for Wildlife-Related R
- Page 17 and 18: Fishing
- Page 19 and 20: Fishing ExpendituresAnglers spent $
- Page 21: Freshwater Fishing ExpendituresAngl
- Page 25 and 26: Sex and Age of AnglersAlthough more
- Page 27 and 28: The majority of anglers had househo
- Page 29: 2001-2011 Fishing Participants, Day
- Page 32 and 33: Hunting HighlightsIn 2011, 13.7 mil
- Page 34 and 35: Big Game HuntingIn 2011, a majority
- Page 36 and 37: Days per hunterTrips per hunterTrip
- Page 38 and 39: Hunting on Public and PrivateLandsm
- Page 40 and 41: Large MSA25%Medium MSA17%Percent of
- Page 42 and 43: Hispanics, who represent a growingp
- Page 45 and 46: Wildlife WatchingU.S. Fish and Wild
- Page 47 and 48: Wildlife-Watching ExpendituresThirt
- Page 49 and 50: Wildlife Fed, Observed, orPhotograp
- Page 51 and 52: Metropolitan and NonmetropolitanAro
- Page 53 and 54: Education, Race, and Ethnicity ofAr
- Page 55 and 56: Away-From-Home Participantsby Type
- Page 57 and 58: Away-From-Home WildlifeWatchers by
- Page 59 and 60: Metropolitan and NonmetropolitanAwa
- Page 61 and 62: 2001-2011 Comparison of Wildlife-Wa
- Page 63: 2006-2011 Wildlife-Watching Partici
- Page 66 and 67: Guide to Statistical TablesPurpose
- Page 68 and 69: Table 3. Freshwater Anglers and Day
- Page 70 and 71: Table 7. Hunters and Days of Huntin
- Page 72 and 73:
Table 8. Selected Characteristics o
- Page 74 and 75:
Table 9. Selected Characteristics o
- Page 76 and 77:
Table 10. Selected Characteristics
- Page 78 and 79:
Table 12. Expenditures for Fishing:
- Page 80 and 81:
Table 14. Trip and Equipment Expend
- Page 82 and 83:
Table 16. Trip and Equipment Expend
- Page 84 and 85:
Table 18. Trip and Equipment Expend
- Page 86 and 87:
Table 20. Trip and Equipment Expend
- Page 88 and 89:
Table 22. Special Equipment Expendi
- Page 90 and 91:
Table 25. Freshwater Anglers and Da
- Page 92 and 93:
Table 29. Hunters and Days of Hunti
- Page 94 and 95:
Table 33. Hunters Preparing for Hun
- Page 96 and 97:
Table 37. Participation in Wildlife
- Page 98 and 99:
Table 40. Expenditures for Wildlife
- Page 100 and 101:
Table 41. Selected Characteristics
- Page 102 and 103:
Table 42. Selected Characteristics
- Page 104 and 105:
Table 46. Total Wildlife-Related Pa
- Page 106 and 107:
Appendix A.DefinitionsAnnual househ
- Page 108 and 109:
State governments (such as State pa
- Page 110 and 111:
Appendix B.2010 Participation of 6-
- Page 112 and 113:
Table B-4. Most Recent Year of Fish
- Page 114 and 115:
Table B-7. Selected Characteristics
- Page 116 and 117:
Table B-9. Participation by 6-to-15
- Page 118 and 119:
Appendix C.Significant Methodologic
- Page 120 and 121:
Table C-1. Major Characteristics of
- Page 122 and 123:
Table C-2. Anglers and Hunters by C
- Page 124 and 125:
household income in the 2001Survey.
- Page 126 and 127:
Table C-4. Comparison of Major Find
- Page 128 and 129:
Table C-5. Anglers and Hunters by C
- Page 130 and 131:
Appendix D.Sample Design and Statis
- Page 132 and 133:
lation 6 to 15 years of age were de
- Page 134 and 135:
compute in advance the standard err
- Page 136 and 137:
Illustration of the Computation of
- Page 138 and 139:
Table D-2. Approximate Standard Err
- Page 140 and 141:
Table D-4. Approximate Standard Err
- Page 143:
U.S. Department of the InteriorU.S.