Freshwater <strong>Fishing</strong>Anglers ...........................................Freshwater except Great Lakes .......................Great Lakes ......................................Days ..............................................Freshwater except Great Lakes .......................Great Lakes ......................................Trips. .............................................Freshwater except Great Lakes .......................Great Lakes ......................................Trip <strong>and</strong> equipment expenditures .....................Freshwater except Great Lakes .......................Great Lakes ......................................Note: Detail does not add to total because <strong>of</strong> multiple response <strong>and</strong> nonresponse.Source: Tables 1, 13, 14, <strong>and</strong> 15.Freshwater <strong>Fishing</strong> Trip <strong>and</strong> Equipment Expenditures(Total expenditures: $25.7 billion)Great Lakes7%$1.9 billion27.5 million27.1 million1.7 million455.9 million443.2 million19.7 million368.8 million353.6 million15.2 million$25.7 billion23.8 billion1.9 billionFreshwater except Great Lakes93%$23.8 billionFreshwater <strong>Fishing</strong> HighlightsFreshwater fishing was the mostpopular type <strong>of</strong> fishing. In 2011, 27.5million Americans fished 456 milliondays <strong>and</strong> took 369 million trips. Theirexpenditures for trips <strong>and</strong> equipmenttotaled $25.7 billion for the year. Freshwaterfishing can be separated intoGreat Lakes <strong>and</strong> freshwater other thanthe Great Lakes.There were 27.1 million anglers wh<strong>of</strong>ished for 443 million days on 354million trips to freshwater other thanthe Great Lakes. Trip <strong>and</strong> equipmentexpenditures for non-Great Lakesfreshwater fishing totaled $23.8 billionfor an average <strong>of</strong> $879 per angler forthe year. Food <strong>and</strong> lodging comprised$5.0 billion, 37 percent <strong>of</strong> total expenditures.Transportation costs were $4.5billion or 33 percent <strong>of</strong> trip costs. Othertrip expenses, which include guide fees,equipment rental, <strong>and</strong> bait were $4.0billion for 30 percent.Freshwater <strong>Fishing</strong>Days(Total: 455.9 million)Million30Great Lakes19.7 millionBoth7.0 million252015Freshwater except Great Lakes443.2 million105Great Lakes15.2 millionTrips(Total: 368.8 million)0TotalFreshwaterexcept GreatLakesGreatLakesFreshwater except Great Lakes353.6 millionFreshwater anglersNote: Detail does not add to total because <strong>of</strong>multiple responses <strong>and</strong> nonresponse.10 2011 <strong>National</strong> <strong>Survey</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fishing</strong>, <strong>Hunting</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>Wildlife</strong>-Associated Recreation U.S. Fish <strong>and</strong> <strong>Wildlife</strong> Service <strong>and</strong> U.S. Census Bureau
Freshwater <strong>Fishing</strong> ExpendituresAnglers spent over $10.4 billion onequipment for non-Great Lakes freshwaterfishing. Expenditures for fishingequipment, such as rods <strong>and</strong> reels,tackle boxes, depth finders, <strong>and</strong> artificiallures <strong>and</strong> flies, totaled $4.0 billion.Expenditures for auxiliary equipmentsuch as binoculars <strong>and</strong> camping equipmentwere $560 million. Expendituresfor special equipment such as boats,vans, <strong>and</strong> cabins accounted for $5.9billion.There were 1.7 million people wh<strong>of</strong>ished almost 20 million days on 15million trips to the Great Lakes in 2011.Their Great Lakes-related expenditurestotaled $1.9 billion for an average <strong>of</strong>$1,121 per angler for the year. Triprelatedexpenditures totaled $1.1billion. Of these expenditures, $374million was spent on food <strong>and</strong> lodging,34 percent <strong>of</strong> trip costs; $252 millionwas spent on transportation, 23 percent<strong>of</strong> trip costs; <strong>and</strong> $465 million, or 43percent, was spent on other items suchas guide fees, equipment rental, <strong>and</strong>bait. Equipment expenditures totaled$777 million. Of this $777 million,$223 million was for fishing equipment(rods, reels, etc.), $83 million was forauxiliary equipment (camping equipment,binoculars, etc.) <strong>and</strong> $471 millionwas for special equipment (boats, vans,etc.).Saltwater <strong>Fishing</strong> HighlightsIn 2011, 8.9 million anglers enjoyedsaltwater fishing on 86 million tripstotaling 99 million days. Overall, theyspent $10.3 billion during the year ontrips <strong>and</strong> equipment. Of their expenditures,trip-related costs garnered thelargest portion, $7.3 billion. Food <strong>and</strong>lodging cost $2.4 billion, 32 percent<strong>of</strong> trip expenditures; transportationcosts totaled $1.5 billion, 21 percent <strong>of</strong>trip costs; <strong>and</strong> other trip costs such asequipment rental, bait, <strong>and</strong> guide feeswere $3.4 billion.Anglers spent a total <strong>of</strong> $2.9 billionon equipment for saltwater fishing. Ofthe $2.9 million, $1.4 billion was forfishing equipment (rods, reels, etc.),$217 million for auxiliary equipment(camping equipment, binoculars, etc.),<strong>and</strong> $1.3 billion for special equipment(boats, vans, etc.).Saltwater <strong>Fishing</strong>Anglers. ......... 8.9 millionDays ............ 99.5 millionTrips ............ 86.2 millionTrips <strong>and</strong> equipmentexpenditures ..... $10.3 billionComparative Trip <strong>and</strong> Equipment ExpendituresTotal expensesTrip-relatedEquipmentSource: Tables 1 <strong>and</strong> 16.$23.8 billion58%71%56%$10.3 billion42%29%44%$1.9 billionGreatLakesSaltwater FreshwaterexceptGreat LakesGreatLakesSaltwater FreshwaterexceptGreat LakesU.S. Fish <strong>and</strong> <strong>Wildlife</strong> Service <strong>and</strong> U.S. Census Bureau 2011 <strong>National</strong> <strong>Survey</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fishing</strong>, <strong>Hunting</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>Wildlife</strong>-Associated Recreation 11
- Page 1: U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service2011Nat
- Page 4 and 5: Economics and StatisticsAdministrat
- Page 6 and 7: List of TablesFishing and Hunting1.
- Page 8 and 9: ForewordWhen I was growing up, it w
- Page 11 and 12: Highlights
- Page 13 and 14: watching (observing, photographing,
- Page 15 and 16: Expenditures for Wildlife-Related R
- Page 17 and 18: Fishing
- Page 19: Fishing ExpendituresAnglers spent $
- Page 23 and 24: pike, pickerel, and muskie, as well
- Page 25 and 26: Sex and Age of AnglersAlthough more
- Page 27 and 28: The majority of anglers had househo
- Page 29: 2001-2011 Fishing Participants, Day
- Page 32 and 33: Hunting HighlightsIn 2011, 13.7 mil
- Page 34 and 35: Big Game HuntingIn 2011, a majority
- Page 36 and 37: Days per hunterTrips per hunterTrip
- Page 38 and 39: Hunting on Public and PrivateLandsm
- Page 40 and 41: Large MSA25%Medium MSA17%Percent of
- Page 42 and 43: Hispanics, who represent a growingp
- Page 45 and 46: Wildlife WatchingU.S. Fish and Wild
- Page 47 and 48: Wildlife-Watching ExpendituresThirt
- Page 49 and 50: Wildlife Fed, Observed, orPhotograp
- Page 51 and 52: Metropolitan and NonmetropolitanAro
- Page 53 and 54: Education, Race, and Ethnicity ofAr
- Page 55 and 56: Away-From-Home Participantsby Type
- Page 57 and 58: Away-From-Home WildlifeWatchers by
- Page 59 and 60: Metropolitan and NonmetropolitanAwa
- Page 61 and 62: 2001-2011 Comparison of Wildlife-Wa
- Page 63: 2006-2011 Wildlife-Watching Partici
- Page 66 and 67: Guide to Statistical TablesPurpose
- Page 68 and 69: Table 3. Freshwater Anglers and Day
- Page 70 and 71:
Table 7. Hunters and Days of Huntin
- Page 72 and 73:
Table 8. Selected Characteristics o
- Page 74 and 75:
Table 9. Selected Characteristics o
- Page 76 and 77:
Table 10. Selected Characteristics
- Page 78 and 79:
Table 12. Expenditures for Fishing:
- Page 80 and 81:
Table 14. Trip and Equipment Expend
- Page 82 and 83:
Table 16. Trip and Equipment Expend
- Page 84 and 85:
Table 18. Trip and Equipment Expend
- Page 86 and 87:
Table 20. Trip and Equipment Expend
- Page 88 and 89:
Table 22. Special Equipment Expendi
- Page 90 and 91:
Table 25. Freshwater Anglers and Da
- Page 92 and 93:
Table 29. Hunters and Days of Hunti
- Page 94 and 95:
Table 33. Hunters Preparing for Hun
- Page 96 and 97:
Table 37. Participation in Wildlife
- Page 98 and 99:
Table 40. Expenditures for Wildlife
- Page 100 and 101:
Table 41. Selected Characteristics
- Page 102 and 103:
Table 42. Selected Characteristics
- Page 104 and 105:
Table 46. Total Wildlife-Related Pa
- Page 106 and 107:
Appendix A.DefinitionsAnnual househ
- Page 108 and 109:
State governments (such as State pa
- Page 110 and 111:
Appendix B.2010 Participation of 6-
- Page 112 and 113:
Table B-4. Most Recent Year of Fish
- Page 114 and 115:
Table B-7. Selected Characteristics
- Page 116 and 117:
Table B-9. Participation by 6-to-15
- Page 118 and 119:
Appendix C.Significant Methodologic
- Page 120 and 121:
Table C-1. Major Characteristics of
- Page 122 and 123:
Table C-2. Anglers and Hunters by C
- Page 124 and 125:
household income in the 2001Survey.
- Page 126 and 127:
Table C-4. Comparison of Major Find
- Page 128 and 129:
Table C-5. Anglers and Hunters by C
- Page 130 and 131:
Appendix D.Sample Design and Statis
- Page 132 and 133:
lation 6 to 15 years of age were de
- Page 134 and 135:
compute in advance the standard err
- Page 136 and 137:
Illustration of the Computation of
- Page 138 and 139:
Table D-2. Approximate Standard Err
- Page 140 and 141:
Table D-4. Approximate Standard Err
- Page 143:
U.S. Department of the InteriorU.S.