07.07.2015 Views

SOME SET THEORIES ARE MORE EQUAL ... - Logic at Harvard

SOME SET THEORIES ARE MORE EQUAL ... - Logic at Harvard

SOME SET THEORIES ARE MORE EQUAL ... - Logic at Harvard

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>SOME</strong> <strong>SET</strong> <strong>THEORIES</strong> <strong>ARE</strong> <strong>MORE</strong> <strong>EQUAL</strong> 11in the model one gets from any universe of ZFC by adding (2 ℵ 0) + randomreals. 4Similar situ<strong>at</strong>ion exists with respect to the Kochen-Specker theorem.It deals with spin 1 particle. It follows from Quantum Mechanics th<strong>at</strong>for such a particle and given three mutually orthogonal directions inspace ⃗ X, ⃗ Y , ⃗ Z , while one can not measure simultaneously the valueof the spin along this three axis ,(The corresponding oper<strong>at</strong>ors do notcommute), one can still measure simultaneously the absolute value ofthe spin along the three given axis and then the three values we getare always two 1’s and one 0’s. The Kochen Specker theorem claimsth<strong>at</strong> such behavior can not be realized by a deterministic function. i.e.there is no function F on S 2 which gets the values 0, 1 which s<strong>at</strong>isfythe conditions:(1) For all ⃗ X ∈ S 2 F (− ⃗ X) = F ( ⃗ X)(2) For every triple of mutually orthogonal vectors in S 2 : ⃗ X, ⃗ Y , ⃗ ZF ( ⃗ X) + F ( ⃗ Y ) + F ( ⃗ Z) = 2.(The theorem is really a finitary st<strong>at</strong>ements and hence there are norestriction on the function F ).Call such a function A KS function.Pitowsky in [34] suggested relaxing the requirements above on thefunction F so th<strong>at</strong> clause (2) is assumed to hold almost always in thefollowing sense : For a fixed vector ⃗ X ∈ S 2 the set of ⃗ Y such th<strong>at</strong> if ⃗ Zthe a vector orthogonal to ⃗ X and ⃗ Y then F ( ⃗ X) + F ( ⃗ Y ) + F ( ⃗ Z) ≠ 2is of measure 0 with respect to the usual measure on the gre<strong>at</strong> circleperpendicular to ⃗ X. As before Pitowsky shows th<strong>at</strong> under Martin’saxiom MA there does exists a function on S 2 s<strong>at</strong>isfying the modifiedrequirements. Call such a function a PKS function. Similarly to thelast theorem we are able to proveTheorem 5.2 (Farah,M.). If the continuum is real valued measurablethen there is no PKS function on S 2 does not exists.The same holds inthe model one gets from any universe of ZFC by adding (2 ℵ 0) + randomreals.The functions th<strong>at</strong> Pitowsky constructs above are not measurableand so probably will rejected as having physical meaning in the samesense th<strong>at</strong> the partition of the sphere given by the Banach-Tarski paradoxlacks physical meaning , but the Pitowski functions are not asp<strong>at</strong>hological and there is some vari<strong>at</strong>ion of measure theory in whichthese functions are r<strong>at</strong>her well behaving. As Pitowsky says in [32]:4 Shipman in [39] announced th<strong>at</strong> the same conclusion is consistent with ZFC.We were not able to reconstruct his arguments neither directly nor after correspondingwith him).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!