05.07.2015 Views

ERA-GUI-100.pdf - Europa

ERA-GUI-100.pdf - Europa

ERA-GUI-100.pdf - Europa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Guide for the application of the Art 14 (a) of the Safety Directive and Commission Regulation (EU) No 445/2011<br />

on a system of certification of entities in charge of maintenance for freight wagons – VERSION 1.0<br />

Change management<br />

Other technical modifications<br />

STILL UNDER DISCUSSION<br />

Situations where no possibility to strictly follow the technical file:<br />

‣ Obsolescence of the parts<br />

‣ Replacement by parts conform to other specifications than those in technical<br />

file<br />

Always considered as a major change<br />

Application of the process related to renewal and upgrading (Article 20 of<br />

the Interoperability Directive 2008/57)<br />

Remark:<br />

The ECM may play the role of the applicant in the sense of Interoperability<br />

Directive 2008/57 but:<br />

‣ Not mandatory<br />

‣ This role is not taken into account in the ECM certification<br />

If the specification of the new parts impairs the design operating state, it is considered as a major<br />

change of the technical design and possibly leads to a new authorisation for placing in service<br />

according to the Interoperability Directive.<br />

In case of such major change, the ECM could be the applicant for this new authorisation. In any<br />

case, the ECM should manage it through contractual arrangements with the RU/keeper and taking<br />

in consideration:<br />

<br />

<br />

The existing authorisation for placing in service;<br />

The guarantee of the vehicle by the manufacturer.<br />

Other different question is if the fact, that the specification of the new parts impairs the design<br />

operating state, could be considered as a significant change affecting safety. In this case it is<br />

necessary to evaluate by the proposer (ECM) of the change if the change is relevant and, if it is the<br />

case, to apply the Common safety Method on Risk Assessment and Evaluation.<br />

There are other situations under discussion if it would be necessary a new authorisation.<br />

For instance, in case of a second transformation of wagons to a previous state already<br />

authorised by NSA: on the one hand, it is a modification but on the other hand there are the<br />

“rights of the grandfather”.<br />

Page | 75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!