Railway Safety Performance in the European Union - ERA - Europa
Railway Safety Performance in the European Union - ERA - Europa
Railway Safety Performance in the European Union - ERA - Europa
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Table Country Year Variable Comment<br />
Table 7 DK 2006 I04 National def<strong>in</strong>ition: All events when a restrictive signal is passed is registered, also when <strong>the</strong>re is no real danger and <strong>in</strong> many cases just by<br />
a few meters.<br />
FR 2006 I01 There was a change <strong>in</strong> report<strong>in</strong>g procedures between 2006 and 2007. Us<strong>in</strong>g 2007 report<strong>in</strong>g procedures, <strong>the</strong> figure would have been 346.<br />
FR 2006 I04 There was a change <strong>in</strong> report<strong>in</strong>g procedures between 2006 and 2007. Us<strong>in</strong>g 2007 report<strong>in</strong>g procedures, <strong>the</strong> figure would have been 110.<br />
IT 2008 I01 There has been a change <strong>in</strong> report<strong>in</strong>g procedures between 2007 and 2008.<br />
IT 2006-2008 I02 There has been a change <strong>in</strong> report<strong>in</strong>g procedures between 2006 and 2008.<br />
LT 2006–07 I01-I04 Fluctuation <strong>in</strong> reported nr of occurrences is <strong>the</strong> effect of a change <strong>in</strong> def<strong>in</strong>ition.<br />
NL 2006 I01 The large reported number of track buckles is confirmed. 2006 was a hot summer caus<strong>in</strong>g a lot of track buckles.<br />
NO 2006–07 I01-I02 Vary<strong>in</strong>g wea<strong>the</strong>r conditions caused large fluctuations <strong>in</strong> this variable between 2006 and 2007.<br />
NO 2008 I01, I05 The change <strong>in</strong> reported nr of events is due to an improved implementation of exist<strong>in</strong>g report<strong>in</strong>g procedures.<br />
PL 2006 I03, I04 The <strong>in</strong>frastructure manager did not collect <strong>in</strong>formation on <strong>in</strong>cidents and near misses before 2007. The <strong>in</strong>formation is <strong>the</strong>refore <strong>in</strong>complete.<br />
SPADs were not collected.<br />
PL 2006-2008 I03-I06 There has been a change <strong>in</strong> report<strong>in</strong>g procedures explan<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> fluctuation <strong>in</strong> reported nr of events.<br />
RO 2006-2008 I03 The variable <strong>in</strong>cludes all signall<strong>in</strong>g failures.<br />
Table 8 LV 2008 C01-C04 The large numbers are expla<strong>in</strong>ed by a small number of serious accidents and improved report<strong>in</strong>g and data collection procedures.<br />
Table 9 RO 2008 R04 The change <strong>in</strong> reported nr of work<strong>in</strong>g hours is due to a change <strong>in</strong> def<strong>in</strong>itions and report<strong>in</strong>g procedures.<br />
UK 2007 R04 The change <strong>in</strong> reported nr of work<strong>in</strong>g hours is due to a change <strong>in</strong> report<strong>in</strong>g procedures.<br />
Table 10 BE 2006–07 R03 The figure is taken from Eurostat 2005 data.<br />
DE 2006 R03 The figure given is per 31 December 2007.<br />
IT 2008 R03 The <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> network length is due to a change <strong>in</strong> report<strong>in</strong>g from l<strong>in</strong>e km to track km.<br />
PL 2006–07 R03 The figure is exclud<strong>in</strong>g crossovers on ma<strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>es and is taken from Eurostat 2005 data.<br />
Table 11 LV 2006 A01 The figure only <strong>in</strong>cludes audits conducted by State <strong>Railway</strong> Technical Inspectorate.<br />
LV 2007 A01 The figure <strong>in</strong>cludes audits conducted by IM, RU and State <strong>Railway</strong> Technical Inspectorate.<br />
UK 2008 A01 The change <strong>in</strong> reported nr of audits is due to a change <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>terpretation of <strong>the</strong> def<strong>in</strong>ition.<br />
53