Cableways Impact Assessment Study - Final Report - saferail.nl
Cableways Impact Assessment Study - Final Report - saferail.nl
Cableways Impact Assessment Study - Final Report - saferail.nl
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Risk & Policy Analysts<br />
3.3 <strong>Impact</strong>s in Relation to the <strong>Cableways</strong> Sector<br />
3.3.1 <strong>Impact</strong>s of Standardisation and Product Variety<br />
A key impact of the <strong>Cableways</strong> Directive has been in the area of product<br />
standardisation. The adoption of the Directive has driven the standardisation process<br />
at the European level. Between 2000 and 2005, the CEN Technical Committee<br />
responsible for cableway installations developed harmonised standards relevant to<br />
cableway installations designed to carry persons. There are currently twenty-three<br />
harmonised standards in the field of cableway installations and references to these<br />
standards are published in the Official Journal of the European Union.<br />
Several consultees highlighted that, prior to the Directive, products were based on<br />
different requirements in different countries; however, since the introduction of the<br />
Directive, the market is now supplied with standardised products. As noted in EC<br />
(2011), harmonising the conformity assessment procedures of safety components and<br />
subsystems and promoting the establishment of harmonised standards at the European<br />
level has made economies of scale possible.<br />
While this product standardisation has its advantages, it may have impacted<br />
manufacturers of niche and/or customised products. A cableways manufacturer noted<br />
that there are now a smaller number of products with much less product variety and<br />
this can be directly attributable to the Directive. In this regard, it has also been<br />
observed that manufacturers of customised products which are technically similar to<br />
those falling under the <strong>Cableways</strong> Directive appear keen to distance their products<br />
from the scope of the <strong>Cableways</strong> Directive (and into other legislation such as the<br />
Machinery Directive or national legislation relating to amusement attractions, for<br />
instance). In addition, a cableway manufacturer noted that that the relevant standards<br />
do not sufficiently account for specificities of small ski lifts (so-called handle tow and<br />
rope-tow lifts).<br />
In addition, the International Federation of Ski Lift Operators (FIANET) stated that<br />
the current market situation is such that it is virtually impossible to mix and match<br />
components from various manufacturers and each installation is therefore sourced<br />
from a single manufacturer. It is further accused that the Directive has strengthened<br />
the bargaining power of cableway manufacturers at the expense of operators, and for<br />
example, restricted the choice available to operators with regard to replacement parts.<br />
Overall, it may be deduced that product standardisation has also created<br />
opportunities for increased economies of scale which have been of benefit to the<br />
EU cableways sector but product variety may have reduced as a result of the<br />
Directive.<br />
3.3.2 <strong>Impact</strong> on SMEs, Costs and Innovation<br />
As noted in Section 2, in general, many SME cableway manufacturers focus on the<br />
installation of less complicated and smaller cableways in the form of drag lifts and<br />
basic chairlifts. Based on Table 2.22, it can be assumed that of the 32 SME cableway<br />
Page 61