Cableways Impact Assessment Study - Final Report - saferail.nl

More documents

Recommendations

Info

IA Study Concerning the Revision of the Cableways Directive Figure 2.4: The Alps (Reproduced from Johomaps (2006)) In France and Switzerland, the cableways industry is more clustered in comparison with Italy and Austria. In France, the epicentre of the industry is the town of Grenoble in the South East of France, while in Switzerland a large proportion of companies involved in the cableways industry are located in the North East of the country. In Austria and Italy, however, the industry is less clustered and more dispersed across the alpine regions of these countries. Manufacturers of installations and subsystems and companies involved in cableways planning and consultation are all located in close proximity to the Alps. This location offers significant strategic advantages for companies. Most notably, manufacturers have quick and easy access to each other and to customers in their national markets as well as those in the Alps within neighbouring countries. This also facilitates a more efficient after sales and maintenance service. While the European industry is currently centred on the traditional cableways markets, manufacturing is beginning to take place outside this area, reflecting changing trends in the industry. Leitner, for example, have recently opened a manufacturing facility in Slovakia, as a result of increasing demand from Eastern Europe. This allows closer contact and easier access not only with Slovakia but also other countries of Eastern Europe. France South East France, in the region of Rhône-Alpes, particularly around the cities of Grenoble and Lyon, has become a hub of ski and cableways activity. Manufacturers Page 28
Risk & Policy Analysts of ski equipment are located here as are companies of the Poma group, the manufacturer GMM and many manufacturers of component parts for the cableways industry. Manufacturers of ropes, cabins, control systems, electronic monitoring devices and station accessories as well as planning and consulting companies are all located within this region. Grenoble is situated at the foot of the Alps, close to both the Swiss and Italian borders therefore companies located in South East France have relatively quick and easy access to the large cableways markets of France, Italy and Switzerland. This location is also particularly beneficial for manufacturers as it allows them to provide an efficient after sales and maintenance service for installations in these countries. Table 2.24 lists some of the companies involved in the cableways industry which are located in South East France, however this list is by not exclusive. The locations of each company are also presented in the map in Figure 2.5 in order to better illustrate the location of each company in relation to each other and the proximity to the borders with Switzerland and Italy. The ‘Mountain Industries Cluster of Rhône-Alpes’ (CIM) was established in 2006 and aims to bring companies involved in the ski industry (and other winter sports) and mountain industries with Rhône-Alpes together to promote internationalisation, innovation and performance (CIM, nd). The organisation also promotes Rhône-Alpes as a centre of expertise for all ski and mountain related know-how. Figure 2.5: Location of Cluster of Cableways Activity in South East France Table 2.24: Cableway Related Companies Located in South East France Figure on Map A Company Activity Location GMM Manufacturer Grenoble Poma Manufacturer Voreppe (outskirts of Grenoble) Page 29
Page 1: Ref. Ares(2012)1245393 - 22/10/2012
Page 4 and 5: DISCLAIMER While RPA considers that
Page 6 and 7: Executive Summary market. In additi
Page 8 and 9: Executive Summary Page iv
Page 10 and 11: Table of Contents 4. OPTIONS FOR RE
Page 13 and 14: Risk & Policy Analysts 1. INTRODUCT
Page 15 and 16: Risk & Policy Analysts 2. MARKET SI
Page 17 and 18: Risk & Policy Analysts Figure 2.1:
Page 19 and 20: Risk & Policy Analysts Austria Acco
Page 21 and 22: Risk & Policy Analysts It is of not
Page 23 and 24: Risk & Policy Analysts Western Euro
Page 25 and 26: Risk & Policy Analysts Japan The sk
Page 27 and 28: Risk & Policy Analysts Table 2.12:
Page 33 and 34: Risk & Policy Analysts SME). Taken
Page 35 and 36: Risk & Policy Analysts The industry
Page 37 and 38: Risk & Policy Analysts From the dat
Page 39: Risk & Policy Analysts SMEs In gene
Page 43 and 44: Risk & Policy Analysts Figure 2.6:
Page 47 and 48: Risk & Policy Analysts noted that u
Page 49 and 50: Risk & Policy Analysts cableways ma
Page 55 and 56: Risk & Policy Analysts There are al
Page 57 and 58: Risk & Policy Analysts operation of
Page 59 and 60: Risk & Policy Analysts Other factor
Page 61 and 62: Risk & Policy Analysts Changes in P
Page 65 and 66: Risk & Policy Analysts From Table 2
Page 67 and 68: Risk & Policy Analysts Price Change
Page 69 and 70: Risk & Policy Analysts 2.6.4 Summar
Page 71 and 72: Risk & Policy Analysts Table 3.1: C
Page 73 and 74: Risk & Policy Analysts 3.3 Impacts
Page 75 and 76: Risk & Policy Analysts 3.3.4 Impact
Page 77 and 78: Risk & Policy Analysts 4. OPTIONS F
Page 79 and 80: Risk & Policy Analysts Box 4.1: The
Page 81 and 82: Risk & Policy Analysts The details
Page 83 and 84: Risk & Policy Analysts Overall, sta
Page 85 and 86: Risk & Policy Analysts Option 2 (
Page 87 and 88: Risk & Policy Analysts subject to E
Page 91 and 92:
Risk & Policy Analysts Table 4.14:
Page 93 and 94:
Risk & Policy Analysts out in Table
Page 95 and 96:
Risk & Policy Analysts Table 5.2: K
Page 97 and 98:
Risk & Policy Analysts One example
Page 99 and 100:
Risk & Policy Analysts At least two
Page 101 and 102:
Risk & Policy Analysts Option A3 (R
Page 103 and 104:
Risk & Policy Analysts The cost of
Page 105 and 106:
Risk & Policy Analysts requirements
Page 107 and 108:
Risk & Policy Analysts may come to
Page 109 and 110:
Risk & Policy Analysts Operating Co
Page 111 and 112:
Risk & Policy Analysts Innovation a
Page 113 and 114:
Risk & Policy Analysts To this end,
Page 115 and 116:
Risk & Policy Analysts respondents
Page 117 and 118:
Risk & Policy Analysts Innovation a
Page 119 and 120:
Risk & Policy Analysts Summary of S
Page 121 and 122:
Risk & Policy Analysts Public Autho
Page 123 and 124:
Risk & Policy Analysts Is the cab
Page 125 and 126:
Risk & Policy Analysts Impact on Co
Page 127 and 128:
Risk & Policy Analysts Option F3:
Page 129 and 130:
Risk & Policy Analysts However, the
Page 131 and 132:
Risk & Policy Analysts 5.3.7 Proble
Page 133 and 134:
Risk & Policy Analysts Public Healt
Page 135 and 136:
Risk & Policy Analysts 6.2 Problem
Page 137 and 138:
Risk & Policy Analysts 6.6 Problem
Page 139 and 140:
Risk & Policy Analysts Commision de
Page 141 and 142:
Risk & Policy Analysts Kaiser (nd):
Page 143 and 144:
Risk & Policy Analysts STRMTG (2012
Page 145 and 146:
Risk & Policy Analysts ANNEX 1 Over
Page 147 and 148:
Risk & Policy Analysts A1. CONSULTA
Page 149 and 150:
Risk & Policy Analysts feedback was
Page 151 and 152:
Risk & Policy Analysts ANNEX 2 Revi
Page 153 and 154:
Risk & Policy Analysts B2. REVIEW O
Page 155 and 156:
Risk & Policy Analysts Table B2.2:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169:
Risk & Policy Analysts the NLF, imp
show all

Cableways Impact Assessment Study - Final Report - saferail.nl

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?