Cableways Impact Assessment Study - Final Report - saferail.nl

More documents

Recommendations

Info

IA Study Concerning the Revision of the Cableways Directive France Table 2.4 sets out the total number of cableways in France from 2003 to 2010, with this showing a steady decline from around 3,961 cableways in 2003 to 3,685 cableways in 2010. Table 2.4: Total Number of Cableways in France 2003-2010 Year Number of Cableways 2003 3,961 2004 3,962 2005 3,895 2006 3,891 2007 3,890 2008 3,790 2009 3,731 2010 3,685 Source: STRMTG (2011) In 2010, there were 41 new cableways were installed in France, seven of which were on new sites, while the remaining 34 were replacement installations of existing cableways. Table 2.5 sets out the number of cableways installed by each manufacturer, while Table 2.6 sets out the types of cableways which were actually installed. Table 2.5: Manufacturers of New Cableways Installations in France (2010) Manufacturer Number Percentage Poma 18 43% Doppelmayr-Garaventa 5 12% Leitner 2 5% Other 10 24% Awaiting Confirmation 6 15% Source: STRMTG (2011) Table 2.6: Cableways Installed in France in 2010 by Type Type of Cableway Number of New Installations Drag lifts 15 Chair lifts Detachable (13) Fixed (10) Gondolas 2 Funitel 1 Source: STRMTG (2011) Page 6
Risk & Policy Analysts Austria According to the BMVIT (nd), Austria has around 3,063 cableways, of which 1,079 are cable cars while the remaining 1,984 are drag lifts. In 2010, 27 new cable car installations (i.e. excluding new drag lifts the number of which is not known) were constructed in Austria and this is said to be around the annual average of recent years (BMVIT, 2011). Table 2.7 sets out the types of cableways which were actually installed. Table 2.7: Cableways Installed in Austria in 2010 by Type (excl. Drag Lifts) Type of Cableway Number of New Installations Chair lifts Six-seat (7) Eight-seat (3) Gondolas Monocable (1) Bicable (14) Aerial tramway 1 Combined cableway 1 Source: BMVIT (2011) Italy According to statistics presented by OITAF (2009) there were 2,294 cableways in Italy in 2006. More recent data from the Italian Ministero dei Trasporti shows that in 2011 there were 2,190 cableways in Italy, of which there were: 151 gondola lifts; 863 chair lifts; 95 bi-cable reversible ropeways; 6 bi-cable installations (single or double track rope); 29 funiculars and 1,046 drag lifts. Data from the publication ‘Quota Neve’ (2012) suggest that 28 new cableways were installed in Italy in 2011. Of the 28 new cableways installations in 2011: 32% (9) were gondola lifts; 18% (5) were detachable chairlifts; 21% (6) were fixed-grip chairlifts; and 29% (8) were drag lifts. Table 2.8 presents the manufacturers of cableways installed in Italy in 2011 and the number of cableways supplied by each. Page 7
Page 1: Ref. Ares(2012)1245393 - 22/10/2012
Page 4 and 5: DISCLAIMER While RPA considers that
Page 6 and 7: Executive Summary market. In additi
Page 8 and 9: Executive Summary Page iv
Page 10 and 11: Table of Contents 4. OPTIONS FOR RE
Page 13 and 14: Risk & Policy Analysts 1. INTRODUCT
Page 15 and 16: Risk & Policy Analysts 2. MARKET SI
Page 17: Risk & Policy Analysts Figure 2.1:
Page 21 and 22: Risk & Policy Analysts It is of not
Page 23 and 24: Risk & Policy Analysts Western Euro
Page 25 and 26: Risk & Policy Analysts Japan The sk
Page 27 and 28: Risk & Policy Analysts Table 2.12:
Page 33 and 34: Risk & Policy Analysts SME). Taken
Page 35 and 36: Risk & Policy Analysts The industry
Page 37 and 38: Risk & Policy Analysts From the dat
Page 39 and 40: Risk & Policy Analysts SMEs In gene
Page 41 and 42: Risk & Policy Analysts of ski equip
Page 43 and 44: Risk & Policy Analysts Figure 2.6:
Page 47 and 48: Risk & Policy Analysts noted that u
Page 49 and 50: Risk & Policy Analysts cableways ma
Page 55 and 56: Risk & Policy Analysts There are al
Page 57 and 58: Risk & Policy Analysts operation of
Page 59 and 60: Risk & Policy Analysts Other factor
Page 61 and 62: Risk & Policy Analysts Changes in P
Page 65 and 66: Risk & Policy Analysts From Table 2
Page 67 and 68: Risk & Policy Analysts Price Change
Page 69 and 70:
Risk & Policy Analysts 2.6.4 Summar
Page 71 and 72:
Risk & Policy Analysts Table 3.1: C
Page 73 and 74:
Risk & Policy Analysts 3.3 Impacts
Page 75 and 76:
Risk & Policy Analysts 3.3.4 Impact
Page 77 and 78:
Risk & Policy Analysts 4. OPTIONS F
Page 79 and 80:
Risk & Policy Analysts Box 4.1: The
Page 81 and 82:
Risk & Policy Analysts The details
Page 83 and 84:
Risk & Policy Analysts Overall, sta
Page 85 and 86:
Risk & Policy Analysts Option 2 (
Page 87 and 88:
Risk & Policy Analysts subject to E
Page 89 and 90:
Risk & Policy Analysts Table 4.13:
Page 91 and 92:
Risk & Policy Analysts Table 4.14:
Page 93 and 94:
Risk & Policy Analysts out in Table
Page 95 and 96:
Risk & Policy Analysts Table 5.2: K
Page 97 and 98:
Risk & Policy Analysts One example
Page 99 and 100:
Risk & Policy Analysts At least two
Page 101 and 102:
Risk & Policy Analysts Option A3 (R
Page 103 and 104:
Risk & Policy Analysts The cost of
Page 105 and 106:
Risk & Policy Analysts requirements
Page 107 and 108:
Risk & Policy Analysts may come to
Page 109 and 110:
Risk & Policy Analysts Operating Co
Page 111 and 112:
Risk & Policy Analysts Innovation a
Page 113 and 114:
Risk & Policy Analysts To this end,
Page 115 and 116:
Risk & Policy Analysts respondents
Page 117 and 118:
Risk & Policy Analysts Innovation a
Page 119 and 120:
Risk & Policy Analysts Summary of S
Page 121 and 122:
Risk & Policy Analysts Public Autho
Page 123 and 124:
Risk & Policy Analysts Is the cab
Page 125 and 126:
Risk & Policy Analysts Impact on Co
Page 127 and 128:
Risk & Policy Analysts Option F3:
Page 129 and 130:
Risk & Policy Analysts However, the
Page 131 and 132:
Risk & Policy Analysts 5.3.7 Proble
Page 133 and 134:
Risk & Policy Analysts Public Healt
Page 135 and 136:
Risk & Policy Analysts 6.2 Problem
Page 137 and 138:
Risk & Policy Analysts 6.6 Problem
Page 139 and 140:
Risk & Policy Analysts Commision de
Page 141 and 142:
Risk & Policy Analysts Kaiser (nd):
Page 143 and 144:
Risk & Policy Analysts STRMTG (2012
Page 145 and 146:
Risk & Policy Analysts ANNEX 1 Over
Page 147 and 148:
Risk & Policy Analysts A1. CONSULTA
Page 149 and 150:
Risk & Policy Analysts feedback was
Page 151 and 152:
Risk & Policy Analysts ANNEX 2 Revi
Page 153 and 154:
Risk & Policy Analysts B2. REVIEW O
Page 155 and 156:
Risk & Policy Analysts Table B2.2:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169:
Risk & Policy Analysts the NLF, imp
show all

Cableways Impact Assessment Study - Final Report - saferail.nl

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?