Cableways Impact Assessment Study - Final Report - saferail.nl

Cableways Impact Assessment Study - Final Report - saferail.nl Cableways Impact Assessment Study - Final Report - saferail.nl

04.07.2015 Views

IA Study Concerning the Revision of the Cableways Directive Table B2.24: Safeguard Measures (Community safeguard procedure) Obligations of Member States up by Article 5 of Directive 98/34/EC. That Committee shall consult the relevant European standardisation body or bodies and deliver its opinion without delay. Source: Article R32, Chapter R5, Decision (EC) 768/2008 Added value? Table B2.25: Safeguard Measures (Compliant products which present a risk to health and safety) Obligations of Member States Added value? 1. Where, having performed an evaluation under Article [R31(1)], a Member State finds No that although a product is in compliance with this ... [act], it presents a risk to the health or safety of persons or to other aspects of public interest protection, it shall require the relevant economic operator to take all appropriate measures to ensure that the product concerned, when placed on the market, no longer presents that risk, to withdraw the product from the market or to recall it within a reasonable period, commensurate with the nature of the risk, as it may prescribe. 2. The economic operator shall ensure that corrective action is taken in respect of all the products concerned that he has made available on the market throughout the Community. 3. The Member State shall immediately inform the Commission and the other Member States. That information shall include all available details, in particular the data necessary for the identification of the product concerned, the origin and the supply chain of the product, the nature of the risk involved and the nature and duration of the national measures taken. 4. The Commission shall without delay enter into consultation with the Member States and the relevant economic operator or operators and shall evaluate the national measures taken. On the basis of the results of that evaluation, the Commission shall decide whether the measure is justified or not, and where necessary, propose appropriate measures. 5. The Commission shall address its decision to all Member States and shall immediately communicate it to them and the relevant economic operator or operators Source: Article R33, Chapter R5, Decision (EC) 768/2008 No No No No B2.3 Stage 3: Summary of Provisions Identified under Steps 1 and 2 and their Practical Implications Problem Area E – Alignment with the NLF – Obligations of Economic Operators With regards the obligations of Economic Operators; alignment with the NLF is most likely to impact the obligations of importers and distributors through the application of Articles R2 to R7. Currently the Cableways Directive does not provide specific guidance with regards the roles and responsibilities of importers and distributors. The Cableways Directive states that where obligations are not fulfilled by the manufacturer they are to be fulfilled by the company that places the product on the market. Alignment with the NLF will ensure greater transparency as importers and distributors (as well as other economic operators) will be aware of the specific role and the responsibilities of both importers and distributors. More importantly, under Page 156

Risk & Policy Analysts the NLF, importers and distributors are obliged to ensure that the product they are marketing is suitable for the market, verify that the product has the required safety markings and accompanying documentation, and is in conformity with the Community harmonisation legislation. The Cableways Directive does provide guidance with regards the obligations of manufacturers and their authorised representatives. However, the application of certain articles of the NLF will complement the existing framework and may provide even greater clarity. Problem Area F – Alignment with the NLF – Criteria for Notified Bodies With regards problem area F and the criteria for notified bodies, it is anticipated that the most important articles of the NLF Decision are Articles R23, R26 and R28. This would include revising the procedure for notification of notified bodies and reinforcing the information and other obligations of notified bodies. By aligning the Cableways Directive with the NLF, Member States will have the power to object to the notification of a new notified body (within a set time period) and the Commission will be able to challenge the competence of notified bodies. Furthermore, alignment with the NLF will encourage cooperation between notified bodies. In particular, notified bodies are required to inform each other about certification and rejections of approvals. This is already done voluntarily by some notified bodies however there are others that do not report. Other Articles of the NLF Decision which concern the criteria for notified bodies are also important; however these will complement the existing framework rather than introduce any significant changes. Problem Area G – Alignment with the NLF – Safeguard Procedure With regards problem area G and the safeguard procedure, it is anticipated that the most important Articles of the NLF Decision are Articles R31 to R32. By aligning the Cableways Directive with the NLF the existing safeguard clause procedure is revised. A two-step procedure is introduced and the steps to be taken by the authorities concerned, when a non-compliant subsystem and/or safety component is found are specified. A ‘real’ safeguard clause procedure (i.e. one leading to a Decision at Commission level on whether a measure is justified or not) is only launched when another Member State objects to a measure taken against a subsystem and/or safety component. Where there is no disagreement on the restrictive measure taken, all Member States must take the appropriate action on their territory. Page 157

IA <strong>Study</strong> Concerning the Revision of the <strong>Cableways</strong> Directive<br />

Table B2.24: Safeguard Measures (Community safeguard procedure)<br />

Obligations of Member States<br />

up by Article 5 of Directive 98/34/EC. That Committee shall consult the relevant<br />

European standardisation body or bodies and deliver its opinion without delay.<br />

Source: Article R32, Chapter R5, Decision (EC) 768/2008<br />

Added<br />

value?<br />

Table B2.25: Safeguard Measures (Compliant products which present a risk to health and<br />

safety)<br />

Obligations of Member States<br />

Added<br />

value?<br />

1. Where, having performed an evaluation under Article [R31(1)], a Member State finds No<br />

that although a product is in compliance with this ... [act], it presents a risk to the health or<br />

safety of persons or to other aspects of public interest protection, it shall require the<br />

relevant economic operator to take all appropriate measures to ensure that the product<br />

concerned, when placed on the market, no longer presents that risk, to withdraw the<br />

product from the market or to recall it within a reasonable period, commensurate with the<br />

nature of the risk, as it may prescribe.<br />

2. The economic operator shall ensure that corrective action is taken in respect of all the<br />

products concerned that he has made available on the market throughout the Community.<br />

3. The Member State shall immediately inform the Commission and the other Member<br />

States. That information shall include all available details, in particular the data necessary<br />

for the identification of the product concerned, the origin and the supply chain of the<br />

product, the nature of the risk involved and the nature and duration of the national<br />

measures taken.<br />

4. The Commission shall without delay enter into consultation with the Member States<br />

and the relevant economic operator or operators and shall evaluate the national measures<br />

taken. On the basis of the results of that evaluation, the Commission shall decide whether<br />

the measure is justified or not, and where necessary, propose appropriate measures.<br />

5. The Commission shall address its decision to all Member States and shall immediately<br />

communicate it to them and the relevant economic operator or operators<br />

Source: Article R33, Chapter R5, Decision (EC) 768/2008<br />

No<br />

No<br />

No<br />

No<br />

B2.3 Stage 3: Summary of Provisions Identified under Steps 1 and 2 and<br />

their Practical Implications<br />

Problem Area E – Alignment with the NLF – Obligations of Economic Operators<br />

With regards the obligations of Economic Operators; alignment with the NLF is most<br />

likely to impact the obligations of importers and distributors through the application<br />

of Articles R2 to R7. Currently the <strong>Cableways</strong> Directive does not provide specific<br />

guidance with regards the roles and responsibilities of importers and distributors. The<br />

<strong>Cableways</strong> Directive states that where obligations are not fulfilled by the<br />

manufacturer they are to be fulfilled by the company that places the product on the<br />

market. Alignment with the NLF will ensure greater transparency as importers and<br />

distributors (as well as other economic operators) will be aware of the specific role<br />

and the responsibilities of both importers and distributors. More importantly, under<br />

Page 156

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!