Cableways Impact Assessment Study - Final Report - saferail.nl

More documents

Recommendations

Info

IA Study Concerning the Revision of the Cableways Directive Table B2.13: Notification of Conformity Assessment Bodies Presumption of Conformity Where a conformity assessment body demonstrates its conformity with the criteria laid down in the relevant harmonised standards or parts thereof the references of which have been published in the Official Journal of the European Union it shall be presumed to comply with the requirements set out in Article [R17] in so far as the applicable harmonised standards cover those requirements. Source: Article R18, Chapter R4 of Decision No 768/2008/EC Added value? No Table B2.14: Notification of Conformity Assessment Bodies Subsidiaries of and Subcontracting by Notified Bodies 1. Where a notified body subcontracts specific tasks connected with conformity assessment or has recourse to a subsidiary, it shall ensure that the subcontractor or the subsidiary meets the requirements set out in Article [R17] and shall inform the notifying authority accordingly. 2. Notified bodies shall take full responsibility for the tasks performed by subcontractors or subsidiaries wherever these are established. 3. Activities may be subcontracted or carried out by a subsidiary only with the agreement of the client. 4. Notified bodies shall keep at the disposal of the notifying authority the relevant documents concerning the assessment of the qualifications of the subcontractor or the subsidiary and the work carried out by them under…[reference to the relevant part of the legislation]. Source: Article R20, Chapter R4 of Decision No 768/2008/EC Added value? No No No Yes Table B2.15: Notification of Conformity Assessment Bodies Accredited in-house Bodies 1. An accredited in-house body may be used to carry out conformity assessment activities for the undertaking of which it forms a part for the purpose of implementing the procedures set out in [Annex II – modules A1, A2, C1 or C2]. That body shall constitute a separate and distinct part of the undertaking and shall not participate in the design, production, supply, installation, use or maintenance of the products it assesses. 2. An accredited in-house body shall meet the following requirements: Added value? Yes 40 Yes 41 (a) it shall be accredited in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 765/2008; (b) the body and its personnel shall be organisationally identifiable and have reporting methods within the undertaking of which they form a part which ensure their impartiality and demonstrate it to the relevant national accreditation body; (c) neither the body nor its personnel shall be responsible for the design, manufacture, supply, installation, operation or maintenance of the products they assess nor shall they engage in any activity that might conflict with their 40 41 This paragraph may add value to the Cableways Directive, however exemption for the cableways sector could be considered. See footnote above. Page 150
Risk & Policy Analysts Table B2.15: Notification of Conformity Assessment Bodies Accredited in-house Bodies independence of judgement or integrity in relation to their assessment activities; (d) the body shall supply its services exclusively to the undertaking of which it forms a part. 3. An accredited in-house body shall not be notified to the Member States or the Commission, but information concerning its accreditation shall be given by the undertaking of which it forms a part or by the national accreditation body to the notifying authority at the request of that authority. Source: Article R21, Chapter R4 of Decision No 768/2008/EC Added value? Yes 42 Table B2.16: Notification of Conformity Assessment Bodies Application for Notification 1. A conformity assessment body shall submit an application for notification to the notifying authority of the Member State in which it is established. 2. That application shall be accompanied by a description of the conformity assessment module or modules and the product or products for which that body claims to be competent, as well as by an accreditation certificate, where one exists, issued by a national accreditation body attesting that the conformity assessment body fulfils the requirements laid down in Article [R17] of this…[act]. 3. Where the conformity assessment body concerned cannot provide an accreditation certificate, it shall provide the notifying authority with all the documentary evidence necessary for the verification, recognition and regular monitoring of its compliance with the requirements laid down in Article [R17]. Source: Article R22, Chapter R4 of Decision No 768/2008/EC Added value? No Yes Yes Table B2.17: Notification of Conformity Assessment Bodies Notification Procedure 1. Notifying authorities may notify only conformity assessment bodies which have satisfied the requirements laid down in Article [R17]. 2. They shall notify the Commission and the other Member States using the electronic notification tool developed and managed by the Commission. 3. The notification shall include full details of the conformity assessment activities, the conformity assessment module or modules and product or products concerned and the relevant attestation of competence. 4. Where notification is not based on an accreditation certificate as referred to in Article [R22(2)], the notifying authority shall provide the Commission and the other Member States with documentary evidence which attests to the conformity assessment body’s competence and the arrangements in place to ensure that the body will be monitored regularly and will continue to satisfy the requirements laid down in Article [R17]. 5. The body concerned may perform the activities of a notified body only where no Added value? No No No No Yes 42 This paragraph may add value to the Cableways Directive, however exemption for the cableways sector could be considered. Page 151
Page 1:
Ref. Ares(2012)1245393 - 22/10/2012
Page 4 and 5:
DISCLAIMER While RPA considers that
Page 6 and 7:
Executive Summary market. In additi
Page 8 and 9:
Executive Summary Page iv
Page 10 and 11:
Table of Contents 4. OPTIONS FOR RE
Page 13 and 14:
Risk & Policy Analysts 1. INTRODUCT
Page 15 and 16:
Risk & Policy Analysts 2. MARKET SI
Page 17 and 18:
Risk & Policy Analysts Figure 2.1:
Page 19 and 20:
Risk & Policy Analysts Austria Acco
Page 21 and 22:
Risk & Policy Analysts It is of not
Page 23 and 24:
Risk & Policy Analysts Western Euro
Page 25 and 26:
Risk & Policy Analysts Japan The sk
Page 27 and 28:
Risk & Policy Analysts Table 2.12:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Risk & Policy Analysts SME). Taken
Page 35 and 36:
Risk & Policy Analysts The industry
Page 37 and 38:
Risk & Policy Analysts From the dat
Page 39 and 40:
Risk & Policy Analysts SMEs In gene
Page 41 and 42:
Risk & Policy Analysts of ski equip
Page 43 and 44:
Risk & Policy Analysts Figure 2.6:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Risk & Policy Analysts noted that u
Page 49 and 50:
Risk & Policy Analysts cableways ma
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Risk & Policy Analysts There are al
Page 57 and 58:
Risk & Policy Analysts operation of
Page 59 and 60:
Risk & Policy Analysts Other factor
Page 61 and 62:
Risk & Policy Analysts Changes in P
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Risk & Policy Analysts From Table 2
Page 67 and 68:
Risk & Policy Analysts Price Change
Page 69 and 70:
Risk & Policy Analysts 2.6.4 Summar
Page 71 and 72:
Risk & Policy Analysts Table 3.1: C
Page 73 and 74:
Risk & Policy Analysts 3.3 Impacts
Page 75 and 76:
Risk & Policy Analysts 3.3.4 Impact
Page 77 and 78:
Risk & Policy Analysts 4. OPTIONS F
Page 79 and 80:
Risk & Policy Analysts Box 4.1: The
Page 81 and 82:
Risk & Policy Analysts The details
Page 83 and 84:
Risk & Policy Analysts Overall, sta
Page 85 and 86:
Risk & Policy Analysts Option 2 (
Page 87 and 88:
Risk & Policy Analysts subject to E
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Risk & Policy Analysts out in Table
Page 95 and 96:
Risk & Policy Analysts Table 5.2: K
Page 97 and 98:
Risk & Policy Analysts One example
Page 99 and 100:
Risk & Policy Analysts At least two
Page 101 and 102:
Risk & Policy Analysts Option A3 (R
Page 103 and 104:
Risk & Policy Analysts The cost of
Page 105 and 106:
Risk & Policy Analysts requirements
Page 107 and 108:
Risk & Policy Analysts may come to
Page 109 and 110:
Risk & Policy Analysts Operating Co
Page 111 and 112: Risk & Policy Analysts Innovation a
Page 113 and 114: Risk & Policy Analysts To this end,
Page 115 and 116: Risk & Policy Analysts respondents
Page 117 and 118: Risk & Policy Analysts Innovation a
Page 119 and 120: Risk & Policy Analysts Summary of S
Page 121 and 122: Risk & Policy Analysts Public Autho
Page 123 and 124: Risk & Policy Analysts Is the cab
Page 125 and 126: Risk & Policy Analysts Impact on Co
Page 127 and 128: Risk & Policy Analysts Option F3:
Page 129 and 130: Risk & Policy Analysts However, the
Page 131 and 132: Risk & Policy Analysts 5.3.7 Proble
Page 133 and 134: Risk & Policy Analysts Public Healt
Page 135 and 136: Risk & Policy Analysts 6.2 Problem
Page 137 and 138: Risk & Policy Analysts 6.6 Problem
Page 139 and 140: Risk & Policy Analysts Commision de
Page 141 and 142: Risk & Policy Analysts Kaiser (nd):
Page 143 and 144: Risk & Policy Analysts STRMTG (2012
Page 145 and 146: Risk & Policy Analysts ANNEX 1 Over
Page 147 and 148: Risk & Policy Analysts A1. CONSULTA
Page 149 and 150: Risk & Policy Analysts feedback was
Page 151 and 152: Risk & Policy Analysts ANNEX 2 Revi
Page 153 and 154: Risk & Policy Analysts B2. REVIEW O
Page 155 and 156: Risk & Policy Analysts Table B2.2:
Page 161: Risk & Policy Analysts Table B2.12:
Page 169: Risk & Policy Analysts the NLF, imp
show all

Cableways Impact Assessment Study - Final Report - saferail.nl

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?