Cableways Impact Assessment Study - Final Report - saferail.nl

More documents

Recommendations

Info

IA Study Concerning the Revision of the Cableways Directive Table B2.5: Clarifying the Responsibilities and Accountability of ‘Distributors’ Obligations of Distributors product into conformity, to withdraw it or recall it, if appropriate, are taken. Furthermore, where the product presents a risk, distributors shall immediately inform the competent national authorities of the Member States in which they made the product available to that effect, giving details, in particular, of the non-compliance and of any corrective measures taken. 5. Distributors shall, further to a reasoned request from a competent national authority, provide it with all the information and documentation necessary to demonstrate the conformity of a product. They shall cooperate with that authority, at its request, on any action taken to eliminate the risks posed by products which they have made available on the market. Source: Article R5, Chapter R2 of Decision No 768/2008/EC Added value? No Table B2.6: Cases in Which Obligations of Manufacturers Apply to Importers and Distributors Obligations of Importers and Distributors Added value? An importer or distributor shall be considered a manufacturer for the purposes of this ... No [name of relevant piece of legislation] and he shall be subject to the obligations of the manufacturer under [reference to the relevant part of the legislation], where he places a product on the market under his name or trademark or modifies a product already placed on the market in such a way that compliance with the applicable requirements may be affected. Source: Article R6, Chapter R2 of Decision No 768/2008/EC Table B2.7: Clarifying the Responsibilities of Economic Operators Obligations of Economic Operators Economic operators shall, on request, identify the following to the market surveillance authorities, for ... [period to be specified in proportion to the lifecycle of the product and the level of risk]: (a) any economic operator who has supplied them with a product; (b) any economic operator to whom they have supplied a product. Source: Article R7, Chapter R2 of Decision No 768/2008/EC Added value? Yes Criteria for Notified Bodies Table B2.8: Notification of Conformity Assessment Bodies Notification Member States shall notify the Commission and the other Member States of bodies authorised to carry out third-party conformity assessment tasks under this [act]. Source: Article R13, Chapter R4 of Decision No 768/2008/EC Added value? No Table B2.9: Notification of Conformity Assessment Bodies Notifying Authorities 1. Member States shall designate a notifying authority that shall be responsible for setting up and carrying out the necessary procedures for the assessment and notification of Added value? No Page 146
Risk & Policy Analysts Table B2.9: Notification of Conformity Assessment Bodies Notifying Authorities conformity assessment bodies and the monitoring of notified bodies, including compliance with the provisions of Article [R20]. 2. Member States may decide that the assessment and monitoring referred to in paragraph 1 shall be carried by a national accreditation body within the meaning of and in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 765/2008. 3. Where the notifying authority delegates or otherwise entrusts the assessment, notification or monitoring referred to in paragraph 1 to a body which is not a governmental entity, that body shall be a legal entity and shall comply mutatis mutandis with the requirements laid down in Article [R15 (1) to (6)]. 4. The notifying authority shall take full responsibility for the tasks performed by the body referred to in paragraph 3. Source: Article R14, Chapter R4 of Decision No 768/2008/EC Added value? No No No Table B2.10: Notification of Conformity Assessment Bodies Requirements Relating to Notifying Authorities 1. A notifying authority shall be established in such a way that no conflict of interest with conformity assessment bodies occurs. 2. A notifying authority shall be organised and operated so as to safeguard the objectivity and impartiality of its activities. 3. A notifying authority shall be organised in such a way that each decision relating to notification of a conformity assessment body is taken by competent persons different from those who carried out the assessment. 4. A notifying authority shall not offer or provide any activities that conformity assessment bodies perform or consultancy services on a commercial or competitive basis. 5. A notifying authority shall safeguard the confidentiality of the information it contains. 6. A notifying authority shall have a sufficient number of competent personnel at its disposal for the proper performance of its tasks. Source: Article R15, Chapter R4 of Decision No 768/2008/EC Added value? No No No No No No Table B2.11: Notification of Conformity Assessment Bodies Information Obligation on Notifying Authorities Member States shall inform the Commission of their procedures for the assessment and notification of conformity assessment bodies and the monitoring of notified bodies, and of any changes thereto. Added value? No The Commission shall make that information publicly available. Source: Article R16, Chapter R2 of Decision No 768/2008/EC Page 147
Page 1:
Ref. Ares(2012)1245393 - 22/10/2012
Page 4 and 5:
DISCLAIMER While RPA considers that
Page 6 and 7:
Executive Summary market. In additi
Page 8 and 9:
Executive Summary Page iv
Page 10 and 11:
Table of Contents 4. OPTIONS FOR RE
Page 13 and 14:
Risk & Policy Analysts 1. INTRODUCT
Page 15 and 16:
Risk & Policy Analysts 2. MARKET SI
Page 17 and 18:
Risk & Policy Analysts Figure 2.1:
Page 19 and 20:
Risk & Policy Analysts Austria Acco
Page 21 and 22:
Risk & Policy Analysts It is of not
Page 23 and 24:
Risk & Policy Analysts Western Euro
Page 25 and 26:
Risk & Policy Analysts Japan The sk
Page 27 and 28:
Risk & Policy Analysts Table 2.12:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Risk & Policy Analysts SME). Taken
Page 35 and 36:
Risk & Policy Analysts The industry
Page 37 and 38:
Risk & Policy Analysts From the dat
Page 39 and 40:
Risk & Policy Analysts SMEs In gene
Page 41 and 42:
Risk & Policy Analysts of ski equip
Page 43 and 44:
Risk & Policy Analysts Figure 2.6:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Risk & Policy Analysts noted that u
Page 49 and 50:
Risk & Policy Analysts cableways ma
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Risk & Policy Analysts There are al
Page 57 and 58:
Risk & Policy Analysts operation of
Page 59 and 60:
Risk & Policy Analysts Other factor
Page 61 and 62:
Risk & Policy Analysts Changes in P
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Risk & Policy Analysts From Table 2
Page 67 and 68:
Risk & Policy Analysts Price Change
Page 69 and 70:
Risk & Policy Analysts 2.6.4 Summar
Page 71 and 72:
Risk & Policy Analysts Table 3.1: C
Page 73 and 74:
Risk & Policy Analysts 3.3 Impacts
Page 75 and 76:
Risk & Policy Analysts 3.3.4 Impact
Page 77 and 78:
Risk & Policy Analysts 4. OPTIONS F
Page 79 and 80:
Risk & Policy Analysts Box 4.1: The
Page 81 and 82:
Risk & Policy Analysts The details
Page 83 and 84:
Risk & Policy Analysts Overall, sta
Page 85 and 86:
Risk & Policy Analysts Option 2 (
Page 87 and 88:
Risk & Policy Analysts subject to E
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Risk & Policy Analysts out in Table
Page 95 and 96:
Risk & Policy Analysts Table 5.2: K
Page 97 and 98:
Risk & Policy Analysts One example
Page 99 and 100:
Risk & Policy Analysts At least two
Page 101 and 102:
Risk & Policy Analysts Option A3 (R
Page 103 and 104:
Risk & Policy Analysts The cost of
Page 105 and 106:
Risk & Policy Analysts requirements
Page 107 and 108: Risk & Policy Analysts may come to
Page 109 and 110: Risk & Policy Analysts Operating Co
Page 111 and 112: Risk & Policy Analysts Innovation a
Page 113 and 114: Risk & Policy Analysts To this end,
Page 115 and 116: Risk & Policy Analysts respondents
Page 117 and 118: Risk & Policy Analysts Innovation a
Page 119 and 120: Risk & Policy Analysts Summary of S
Page 121 and 122: Risk & Policy Analysts Public Autho
Page 123 and 124: Risk & Policy Analysts Is the cab
Page 125 and 126: Risk & Policy Analysts Impact on Co
Page 127 and 128: Risk & Policy Analysts Option F3:
Page 129 and 130: Risk & Policy Analysts However, the
Page 131 and 132: Risk & Policy Analysts 5.3.7 Proble
Page 133 and 134: Risk & Policy Analysts Public Healt
Page 135 and 136: Risk & Policy Analysts 6.2 Problem
Page 137 and 138: Risk & Policy Analysts 6.6 Problem
Page 139 and 140: Risk & Policy Analysts Commision de
Page 141 and 142: Risk & Policy Analysts Kaiser (nd):
Page 143 and 144: Risk & Policy Analysts STRMTG (2012
Page 145 and 146: Risk & Policy Analysts ANNEX 1 Over
Page 147 and 148: Risk & Policy Analysts A1. CONSULTA
Page 149 and 150: Risk & Policy Analysts feedback was
Page 151 and 152: Risk & Policy Analysts ANNEX 2 Revi
Page 153 and 154: Risk & Policy Analysts B2. REVIEW O
Page 155 and 156: Risk & Policy Analysts Table B2.2:
Page 157: Risk & Policy Analysts Table B2.4:
Page 169: Risk & Policy Analysts the NLF, imp
show all

Cableways Impact Assessment Study - Final Report - saferail.nl

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?