04.07.2015 Views

Cableways Impact Assessment Study - Final Report - saferail.nl

Cableways Impact Assessment Study - Final Report - saferail.nl

Cableways Impact Assessment Study - Final Report - saferail.nl

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Risk & Policy Analysts<br />

Public Authorities<br />

No significant impacts on public authorities are expected, although the German<br />

authorities expect increased administrative burden from Options D2 and D3,<br />

associated with providing advice.<br />

Innovation and Research<br />

No significant impacts on innovation and research are expected.<br />

Consumers and Households<br />

No impacts on consumers and households have been identified.<br />

Specific Regions and Sectors<br />

These Options would have larger impacts in countries where the current legal<br />

requirements may be interpreted as requiring on-site inspections, while in countries<br />

where no such requirement appears to be in force (e.g. in France) the impacts would<br />

be comparatively smaller.<br />

Public Health and Safety<br />

The Belgian competent authority identified potential benefits but as no specific<br />

problems have been identified, it is not expected that these benefits would be<br />

significant.<br />

Conclusion<br />

The consultation conducted for this study has confirmed problems with lack of clarity<br />

as regards existing requirements. However, it has been suggested that notified bodies<br />

which account for 90% of the notification market already use assessment modules,<br />

suggesting that the impacts of Options D2 and D3 would likely be limited. Inspections<br />

may be required by legislation as subsystems are already assessed by means of<br />

conformity assessment modules some of which do not require on-site inspections.<br />

Therefore, the main impact of the proposed Options would arise in relation to<br />

eliminating disparities in legal interpretation and the lack of legal clarity. In this<br />

respect, however, Option D2 is not seen as effective in reducing legal uncertainty and<br />

Option D3 is seen as preferable.<br />

Page 109

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!