Phytopathogenic Dothideomycetes - CBS - KNAW

More documents

Recommendations

Info

De Gruyter et al. CBS 246.79 Pleospora calvescens 100 CBS 432.77 Ascochyta obiones 99 CBS 206.80 Ascochyta hyalospora CBS 523.66 Pleospora betae, anam. Phoma betae Pleosporaceae (A) 100 100 DAOM 226212 Cocliobolus sativus 100 CBS 191.86 Pleospora herbarum 100 OSC100066 Pyrenophora tritici-repentis CBS 132.69 Pleospora typhicola 100 64 CBS 165.78 Phoma dimorphospora CBS 448.68 Phoma heteromorphospora 56 CBS 269.92 Phoma drobnjacensis 100 60 CBS 275.63 Leptosphaeria maculans, anam. Phoma lingam CBS 119951 Leptosphaeria biglobosa Leptosphaeriaceae (B) 57 CBS 551.93 Phoma tracheiphila CBS 539.63 Phoma vasinfecta CBS 122783 Plectophomella visci 68 99 CBS 363.93 Cucurbitaria berberidis CBS 257.68 Pyrenochaeta cava CBS 407.76 Pyrenochaeta nobilis 100 Cucurbitariaceae (C) 81 81 CBS 101635 Pyrenochaetopsis leptospora CBS 267.59 Pyrenochaeta lycopersici 54 89 CBS 389.80 Leptosphaeria slovacica 100 CBS 505.75 Leptosphaeria doliolum subsp. doliolum Leptosphaeriaceae (D) CBS 616.75 Leptosphaeria conoidea 88 100 CBS 216.75 Chaetosphaeronema hispidulum CBS 335.29 Setophoma terrestris CBS 110109 Phaeosphaeria nodorum CBS 138.96 Neosetophoma samarorum Phaeosphaeriaceae (E) 99 80 CBS 111.79 Paraphoma radicina CBS 110217 Setomelanomma holmii 100 CBS 124455 Phoma glycinicola 93 CBS 124140 Pyrenochaeta dolichi 77 CBS 105.91 Phoma carteri Clade F CBS 101636 Phoma septicidalis CBS 400.71 Coniothyrium palmarum CBS 102202 Neophaeosphaeria filamentosa 100 CBS 133.96 Stagonosporopsis bryoniae CBS 378.67 Didymella lycopersici 100 CBS 183.55 Didymella exigua 100 CBS 615.75 Phoma herbarum Didymellaceae (G) CBS 560.81 Phoma paspali 100 CBS 122788 Paraconiothyrium minitans 100 CBS 652.86 Paraphaeosphaeria michotii Montagnulaceae 100 CBS 797.95 Coniothyrium fuckelii 97 CBS 331.37 Neottiosporina paspali Massarinaceae CBS 252.60 Pyrenochaeta romeroi CBS 674.75 Pyrenochaeta mackinnonii CBS 524.50 Sporormiella minima Sporormiaceae 100 0.1 Fig. 1. The phylogeny of Phoma lingam and Phoma betae, the type species of Phoma sections Plenodomus and Pilosa, based on the strict consensus tree from a Bayesian analysis of 48 LSU/SSU sequences. The Bayesian posterior probabilities are given at the nodes. The tree was rooted to Sporormiella minima (CBS 524.50). respectively. The tree (Fig. 1) was rooted to Sporormiella minima (CBS 524.50). The Bayesian analysis resulted in 6 5442 trees after 3 272 000 generations, from which the burn-in was discarded and the consensus tree and posterior probabilities were calculated based on 56 028 trees (Fig. 1). The families that belong to Pleosporineae, represented by the species grouping in clades A–G, clustered in a strongly supported clade (99 % posterior probability). Clade A, representing those species classified in Pleosporaceae, was strongly supported (100 %) and included two subclades. Pleospora betae (anam. Ph. betae), clustered with Pleospora calvescens (anam. Ascochyta caulina), A. obiones and A. hyalospora; all recorded as pathogens on Chenopodiaceae. The generic type species Pleospora herbarum, a plurivorous species, grouped with Cochliobolus sativus, Pyrenophora tritici-repentis and Pleospora typhicola (anam. Ph. typhina), all recorded from Poaceae. Clade B includes Leptosphaeria maculans (anam. Ph. lingam) and clustered with Leptosphaeria biglobosa. In clade B also other important plant pathogens of Phoma section Plenodomus can be found, such as Ph. tracheiphila, Ph. vasinfecta, Ph. drobnjacensis, and Plectophomella 12
Phoma sections Plenodomus, Pilosa visci. Phoma heteromorphospora, type species of Phoma section Heterospora (Boerema et al. 1997) and Ph. dimorphospora also grouped in this Leptosphaeria clade, in congruence with previous findings (de Gruyter et al. 2009, Aveskamp et al. 2010). Leptosphaeria doliolum (anam. Ph. acuta), type species of the genus Leptosphaeria, is found in Clade D, clustering with L. conoidea and L. slovacica. Leptosphaeria doliolum and its relatives comprise a sister clade C with species classified in Cucurbitariaceae, including Cucurbitaria berberidis, the three Pyrenochaeta species, Py. cava, Py. lycopersici and Py. nobilis, and Pyrenochaetopsis leptospora. Phaeosphaeria nodorum and its relatives Neosetophoma samarorum, Setophoma terrestris, Chaetosphaeronema hispidulum, Paraphoma radicina and Setomelanomma holmii, represent Phaeosphaeriaceae in clade E as has previously been found (de Gruyter et al. 2009, 2010). A distinct clade F includes Ph. glycinicola, Ph. carteri, Ph. septicidalis, and the taxonomic confusing species Pyrenochaeta dolichi (Grondona et al. 1997). The position of Coniothyrium palmarum and Neophaeosphaeria filamentosa could not be clarified, but both species are also treated below in a phylogeny including close relatives based on ITS and LSU regions (Fig. 2). Didymella exigua, type species of the genus Didymella, and Ph. herbarum represent Didymellaceae, and clustered in a wellsupported clade (G) in congruence with previous studies (de Gruyter et al. 2009, 2010, Aveskamp et al. 2010). The molecular phylogeny of species which group in this analysis outside of Pleosporineae in Montagnulaceae, Massarinaceae and Sporormiaceae were further analysed utilising LSU sequence data of a broader range of taxa (Fig. 5). Phoma section Plenodomus and close allies The aligned sequence matrix obtained for the LSU and ITS regions had a total length of 1 921 nucleotide characters, 1 332 and 589 respectively. The combined dataset used in the analyses included 87 taxa and contained 1921 characters with 298 and 118 unique site patterns for LSU and ITS respectively. The tree (Fig. 2) was rooted to Ph. herbarum (CBS 615.75), the representative isolate of the type species of Phoma (Boerema et al. 2004). The Bayesian analysis resulted in 100 002 trees after 5 000 000 generations, from which the burn-in was discarded and the consensus tree and posterior probabilities were calculated based on 90 930 trees (Fig. 2). The species currently classified in Leptosphaeria and Phoma section Plenodomus grouped in clades A and B representing Leptosphaeriaceae, including the type species Ph. lingam and Leptosphaeria doliolum, respectively. Isolates of the taxa that represent Cucurbitariaceae, Cucurbitaria berberidis and its related species Pyrenochaeta cava, Py. nobilis, Py. lycopersici and Pyrenochaetopsis leptospora, clustered in a distinct clade D only distantly related to Leptosphaeriaceae. This finding agrees with a recent study (de Gruyter et al. 2010). Phoma pratorum clustered with Pyrenochaetopsis leptospora. Leptosphaeria biglobosa grouped in a subclade A1 with Ph. wasabiae, the cause of black rot disease on Wasabia japonica (Brassicaceae) and Ph. pimpinellae, a necrotroph on Pimpinella anisum (Apiaceae). Leptosphaeria maculans, considered as closely related to the L. biglobosa complex, proved to be more distantly related in clade A1. In this subclade, other important pathogens can be found, such as Ph. tracheiphila, a quarantine organism on Citrus spp. (Rutaceae), Ph. vasinfecta, a pathogen on Chrysanthemum spp. (Asteraceae), L. lindquistii (anam. Ph. macdonaldii), a worldwide pathogen on Helianthus annuus (Asteraceae) and Ph. lupini, a seed borne pathogen known from Lupinus spp. (Fabaceae). Subclade A1 also comprises both varieties of Ph. enteroleuca, opportunistic pathogens on deciduous trees and shrubs, and the necrotrophic species L. agnita (anam. Ph. agnita), Ph. congesta (both recorded on Asteraceae), Ph. conferta (mainly on Brassicaceae), L. hendersoniae (on Salicaceae), L. fallaciosa, L. collinsoniae (mainly on Lamiaceae) and L. libanotis (on Apiaceae). Plectophomella visci, recorded from leaves of Viscum album (Viscaceae), also clustered in the Leptosphaeriaceae. The genus Plenodomus is re-introduced here to accommodate the species in subclade A1, which are allied to Ph. lingam. Subclade A2 comprises pathogenic species often causing leaf spots such as Ph. apiicola on Apium graveolens (Apiaceae), Ph. drobnjacensis (on Gentianaceae), Ph. violicola (on Violaceae) as well as the necrotrophic species Ph. valerianae, on Valeriana spp. (Valerianaceae). Phoma apiicola and Ph. valerianae were classified in Phoma section Phoma, and Ph. violicola was classified in Phoma sect. Peyronellaea; however, the relationship of these species in Leptosphaeriaceae is clearly demonstrated (Fig. 2), and therefore the species are transferred to the new genus Subplenodomus. These results are in congruence with a recent study where Ph. violicola, Ph. apiicola and Ph. valerianae clustered in a clade representing both Leptosphaeriaceae and Pleosporaceae (Aveskamp et al. 2010). Four Leptosphaeria species, L. macrospora (soil) and the necrotrophic species L. nitschkei (on Asteraceae), L. praetermissa, on Rubus idaeus (Rosaceae) and L. dryadis, on Dryas spp. (Rosaceae) grouped in a subclade A3 and are transferred here to a new genus Paraleptosphaeria. Phoma korfii also clustered in this subclade. The European species Ph. heteromorphospora, type species of Phoma section Heterospora, and the American counterpart Ph. dimorphospora, both pathogens on Chenopodiaceae, grouped in a distinct subclade A4. Phoma sect. Heterospora is raised to generic rank to accommodate both species in Leptosphaeriaceae. Clade B comprises necrotrophic species related to the type species L. doliolum (anam. Ph. acuta). The phylogeny of this species complex, and the closely related species Ph. veronicicola, Ph. macrocapsa and Ph. sydowii, is treated below. The necrotrophic species Ph. sclerotioides, L. conoidea (anam. Ph. doliolum), L. slovacica (anam. Ph. leonuri) and Ph. pedicularis also proved to be related. The species Ph. rubefaciens and Ph. etheridgei also belong to clade B, but these species, both recorded on trees, are more distantly related. The Phoma species in clades A and B are in majority currently described as anamorphs of the genus Leptosphaeria, or belong to Phoma section Plenodomus. These Phoma anamorphs are only distantly related to the type species Ph. herbarum and its relatives in Didymellaceae, and therefore these species described in section Plenodomus are excluded from the genus Phoma. Clade C is more distantly related to Leptosphaeriaceae and comprises species that are related to Coniothyrium palmarum in Coniothyriaceae. Two subclades are recognised in clade C: Ph. glycinicola, Py. dolichi and Ph. carteri group with the generic type species C. palmarum, whereas two isolates of Ph. septicidalis group with Ph. multipora. The teleomorph Neophaeosphaeria filamentosa clustered basal to this clade. Clade D includes the genera Cucurbitaria, Pyrenochaetopsis and Pyrenochaeta, which represent Cucurbitariaceae. This finding is in congruence with previous studies (de Gruyter et al. 2010). www.studiesinmycology.org 13
Page 1: Studies in Mycology 75 (June 2013)
Page 4 and 5: Studies in Mycology The Studies in
Page 6 and 7: INTRODUCTION The present issue of S
Page 8 and 9: Johannes (Hans) de Gruyter National
Page 11 and 12: available online at www.studiesinmy
Page 13 and 14: Phoma sections Plenodomus, Pilosa w
Page 15 and 16: Phoma sections Plenodomus, Pilosa T
Page 21: Phoma sections Plenodomus, Pilosa T
Page 25 and 26: Phoma sections Plenodomus, Pilosa P
Page 27 and 28: Fig 5 Phoma sections Plenodomus, Pi
Page 29 and 30: Phoma sections Plenodomus, Pilosa L
Page 31 and 32: Phoma sections Plenodomus, Pilosa N
Page 33 and 34: Phoma sections Plenodomus, Pilosa S
Page 37 and 38: Phoma sections Plenodomus, Pilosa F
Page 39 and 40: Phoma sections Plenodomus, Pilosa F
Page 41 and 42: Phoma sections Plenodomus, Pilosa S
Page 43 and 44: Phoma sections Plenodomus, Pilosa l
Page 47 and 48: available online at www.studiesinmy
Page 49 and 50: Phylogenetic lineages in Pseudocerc
Page 73 and 74:
Phylogenetic lineages in Pseudocerc
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
available online at www.studiesinmy
Page 127 and 128:
Species concepts in Cercospora Cerc
Page 129 and 130:
Species concepts in Cercospora Tabl
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Species concepts in Cercospora cerc
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Species concepts in Cercospora 1 2
Page 147 and 148:
Species concepts in Cercospora 1 1
Page 149 and 150:
Species concepts in Cercospora CPC
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Species concepts in Cercospora Fig.
Page 155 and 156:
Species concepts in Cercospora C. r
Page 157 and 158:
Species concepts in Cercospora CBS
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Species concepts in Cercospora atte
Page 167 and 168:
Species concepts in Cercospora cell
Page 169 and 170:
Species concepts in Cercospora Cult
Page 171 and 172:
Species concepts in Cercospora dist
Page 173 and 174:
Species concepts in Cercospora Cerc
Page 175 and 176:
Species concepts in Cercospora did
Page 177 and 178:
Species concepts in Cercospora line
Page 179 and 180:
Species concepts in Cercospora REFE
Page 181 and 182:
Studies in Mycology 75: 171-212. Al
Page 183 and 184:
Alternaria redefined Embellisia ann
Page 185 and 186:
Alternaria redefined Table 1. (Cont
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Alternaria redefined Table 3. Coded
Page 195 and 196:
Alternaria redefined Fig. 3. Altern
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Alternaria redefined Section Embell
Page 205 and 206:
Alternaria redefined Fig. 13. Alter
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Alternaria redefined Alternaria cyp
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Alternaria redefined with Dendryphi
Page 221 and 222:
Alternaria redefined (Fig. 2), outs
Page 223 and 224:
Studies in Mycology 75: 213-305. A
Page 225 and 226:
A new approach to species delimitat
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
Page 247 and 248:
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
Page 255 and 256:
Page 257 and 258:
Page 259 and 260:
Page 261 and 262:
Page 263 and 264:
Page 265 and 266:
Page 267 and 268:
Page 269 and 270:
Page 271 and 272:
Page 273 and 274:
Page 275 and 276:
Page 277 and 278:
Page 279 and 280:
Page 281 and 282:
Page 283 and 284:
Page 285 and 286:
Page 287 and 288:
Page 289 and 290:
Page 291 and 292:
Page 293 and 294:
Page 295 and 296:
Page 297 and 298:
Page 299 and 300:
Page 301 and 302:
Page 303 and 304:
Page 305 and 306:
Page 307 and 308:
Page 309 and 310:
Page 311 and 312:
Page 313 and 314:
Page 315 and 316:
Page 317 and 318:
Studies in Mycology 75: 307-390. Si
Page 319 and 320:
Sizing up Septoria elucidation. The
Page 321 and 322:
Sizing up Septoria Table 1. (Contin
Page 323 and 324:
Page 325 and 326:
Page 327 and 328:
Page 329 and 330:
Page 331 and 332:
Page 333 and 334:
Sizing up Septoria 0.1 0.56 0.71 Se
Page 335 and 336:
Sizing up Septoria 0.1 1 1 1 1 0.99
Page 337 and 338:
Sizing up Septoria Table 3. Amplifi
Page 339 and 340:
Sizing up Septoria 1.6x 0.93 1.4x 1
Page 341 and 342:
Sizing up Septoria Fig. 6. Conidia
Page 343 and 344:
Sizing up Septoria Conidiomata pycn
Page 345 and 346:
Sizing up Septoria Fig. 14. Asterom
Page 347 and 348:
Sizing up Septoria of pale brown th
Page 349 and 350:
Sizing up Septoria to verruculose-e
Page 351 and 352:
Sizing up Septoria Fig. 23. Septori
Page 353 and 354:
Sizing up Septoria Fig. 26. Septori
Page 355 and 356:
Sizing up Septoria isolates occur o
Page 357 and 358:
Sizing up Septoria Fig. 32. Sphaeru
Page 359 and 360:
Sizing up Septoria On Anthriscus st
Page 361 and 362:
Sizing up Septoria Fig. 40. Phloeos
Page 363 and 364:
Sizing up Septoria On sterile Carex
Page 365 and 366:
Sizing up Septoria to narrowly obcl
Page 367 and 368:
Sizing up Septoria Fig. 48. Polyphi
Page 369 and 370:
Sizing up Septoria apex, tapering a
Page 371 and 372:
Sizing up Septoria Fig. 56. Pseudos
Page 373 and 374:
Sizing up Septoria Fig. 58. Parasta
Page 375 and 376:
Sizing up Septoria Fig. 63. Neostag
Page 377 and 378:
Sizing up Septoria Fig. 67. Phaeosp
Page 379 and 380:
Sizing up Septoria and sporulating
Page 381 and 382:
Sizing up Septoria Culture characte
Page 383 and 384:
Sizing up Septoria On sterile Carex
Page 385 and 386:
Sizing up Septoria Fig. 82. Conioth
Page 387 and 388:
Sizing up Septoria Etymology: Named
Page 389 and 390:
Sizing up Septoria Fig. 91. Stagono
Page 391 and 392:
Sizing up Septoria Fig. 95. Stagono
Page 393 and 394:
Sizing up Septoria Fig. 100. Setose
Page 395 and 396:
Sizing up Septoria Fig. 103. Phlyct
Page 397 and 398:
Sizing up Septoria Fig. 107. Phlogi
Page 399 and 400:
Sizing up Septoria Crous PW, Verkle
Page 401 and 402:
INDEX OF FUNGAL NAMES Alphabetical
Page 403 and 404:
Alternaria triglochinicola 193 Alte
Page 405 and 406:
Cercospora mercurialis var. annuae
Page 407 and 408:
Dothidea hysterioides 31 Dothistrom
Page 409 and 410:
N Neofabraea alba 384 Neophaeosphae
Page 411 and 412:
Plenodomus hendersoniae 22 Plenodom
Page 413 and 414:
Rhabdospora leucanthemi 266 Rhabdos
Page 415 and 416:
Setophoma sacchari 374 Setophoma te
Page 417 and 418:
Studies in Mycology Studies in Myco
Page 419 and 420:
ering plants in the Southern Hemisp
Page 421:
Studies in Mycology (ISSN 0166-0616
show all

Phytopathogenic Dothideomycetes - CBS - KNAW

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?