Boundary activities and readiness for ... - Projekti-Instituutti
Boundary activities and readiness for ... - Projekti-Instituutti
Boundary activities and readiness for ... - Projekti-Instituutti
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Theoretical background<br />
2.4.1 Introduction to organizational boundaries<br />
An organization’s boundary is one of its basic properties. Boundaries define<br />
<strong>and</strong> limit organizations (Ash<strong>for</strong>th, Kreiner, & Fugate, 2000), separate them<br />
from one another (ibid.), <strong>and</strong> protect organizations from environmental<br />
stresses (Leifer & Delbecq, 1978; Thompson, 1967). Organizational<br />
boundaries have been conceptualized in multiple ways. While some authors<br />
emphasize how boundaries limit separate organizations from each other<br />
<strong>and</strong> protect organizations from external disturbances, others view<br />
boundaries as domains or frontiers where the organization interacts with its<br />
environment <strong>and</strong> acquires required resources (Yan & Louis, 1999). The<br />
choice of definition depends on the degree of autonomy of action the<br />
organization is seen to have concerning its environment (Aldrich & Herker,<br />
1977) <strong>and</strong> how open the organization is perceived to be towards external<br />
influences (Scott, 2003). Typically, a boundary is viewed as the limit,<br />
demarcation or interface between an organization <strong>and</strong> its environment (e.g.<br />
Leifer & Delbecq, 1978).<br />
Although research on organizational boundaries has mostly focused on<br />
the firm as a unit of analysis <strong>and</strong> studied inter-organizational boundaries,<br />
intra-organizational boundaries are also of high importance (Balogun et al.,<br />
2005; Yan & Louis, 1999). Within an organization, boundaries can be<br />
identified between functional units, other work units, different tasks, teams<br />
or in<strong>for</strong>mal groups (Lynn, 2005; Yan & Louis, 1999). The boundaries of<br />
temporary organizations have started to attract attention in recent research<br />
(Craw<strong>for</strong>d & Pollack, 2004; Ratcheva, 2009; Turner & Müller, 2003). This<br />
study focuses on the boundaries of temporary change programs.<br />
There are several reasons <strong>for</strong> why organizational boundaries exist, <strong>and</strong><br />
various types of boundaries can be distinguished. First of all, the division of<br />
labor, specialized tasks <strong>and</strong> focused goals of organizational entities generate<br />
task boundaries (Hirschhorn & Gilmore, 1992; Miller & Rice, 1986). In a<br />
change program context, the program’s task is to create a change in the<br />
parent organization, whereas the parent organization’s task is to maintain<br />
stability <strong>and</strong> operate routine processes. The different task orientations<br />
result in a boundary between the temporary organization <strong>and</strong> its context.<br />
Secondly, the division of authority (both <strong>for</strong>mal <strong>and</strong> in<strong>for</strong>mal) promotes<br />
authority boundaries (Hirschhorn & Gilmore, 1992). In the program<br />
context, the program’s organizing structure includes the division of<br />
authority, defined <strong>and</strong> constrained by the authority structure of the<br />
surrounding parent organization. Thirdly, physical or spatial boundaries<br />
(Hernes, 2004; Scott, 2003) are manifested by either physical structures or<br />
<strong>for</strong>mal rules <strong>and</strong> regulations that regulate human interaction. In the<br />
temporary organization context, project <strong>and</strong> program teams may be<br />
59