02.07.2015 Views

Boundary activities and readiness for ... - Projekti-Instituutti

Boundary activities and readiness for ... - Projekti-Instituutti

Boundary activities and readiness for ... - Projekti-Instituutti

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Theoretical background<br />

2.4.1 Introduction to organizational boundaries<br />

An organization’s boundary is one of its basic properties. Boundaries define<br />

<strong>and</strong> limit organizations (Ash<strong>for</strong>th, Kreiner, & Fugate, 2000), separate them<br />

from one another (ibid.), <strong>and</strong> protect organizations from environmental<br />

stresses (Leifer & Delbecq, 1978; Thompson, 1967). Organizational<br />

boundaries have been conceptualized in multiple ways. While some authors<br />

emphasize how boundaries limit separate organizations from each other<br />

<strong>and</strong> protect organizations from external disturbances, others view<br />

boundaries as domains or frontiers where the organization interacts with its<br />

environment <strong>and</strong> acquires required resources (Yan & Louis, 1999). The<br />

choice of definition depends on the degree of autonomy of action the<br />

organization is seen to have concerning its environment (Aldrich & Herker,<br />

1977) <strong>and</strong> how open the organization is perceived to be towards external<br />

influences (Scott, 2003). Typically, a boundary is viewed as the limit,<br />

demarcation or interface between an organization <strong>and</strong> its environment (e.g.<br />

Leifer & Delbecq, 1978).<br />

Although research on organizational boundaries has mostly focused on<br />

the firm as a unit of analysis <strong>and</strong> studied inter-organizational boundaries,<br />

intra-organizational boundaries are also of high importance (Balogun et al.,<br />

2005; Yan & Louis, 1999). Within an organization, boundaries can be<br />

identified between functional units, other work units, different tasks, teams<br />

or in<strong>for</strong>mal groups (Lynn, 2005; Yan & Louis, 1999). The boundaries of<br />

temporary organizations have started to attract attention in recent research<br />

(Craw<strong>for</strong>d & Pollack, 2004; Ratcheva, 2009; Turner & Müller, 2003). This<br />

study focuses on the boundaries of temporary change programs.<br />

There are several reasons <strong>for</strong> why organizational boundaries exist, <strong>and</strong><br />

various types of boundaries can be distinguished. First of all, the division of<br />

labor, specialized tasks <strong>and</strong> focused goals of organizational entities generate<br />

task boundaries (Hirschhorn & Gilmore, 1992; Miller & Rice, 1986). In a<br />

change program context, the program’s task is to create a change in the<br />

parent organization, whereas the parent organization’s task is to maintain<br />

stability <strong>and</strong> operate routine processes. The different task orientations<br />

result in a boundary between the temporary organization <strong>and</strong> its context.<br />

Secondly, the division of authority (both <strong>for</strong>mal <strong>and</strong> in<strong>for</strong>mal) promotes<br />

authority boundaries (Hirschhorn & Gilmore, 1992). In the program<br />

context, the program’s organizing structure includes the division of<br />

authority, defined <strong>and</strong> constrained by the authority structure of the<br />

surrounding parent organization. Thirdly, physical or spatial boundaries<br />

(Hernes, 2004; Scott, 2003) are manifested by either physical structures or<br />

<strong>for</strong>mal rules <strong>and</strong> regulations that regulate human interaction. In the<br />

temporary organization context, project <strong>and</strong> program teams may be<br />

59

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!