02.07.2015 Views

Boundary activities and readiness for ... - Projekti-Instituutti

Boundary activities and readiness for ... - Projekti-Instituutti

Boundary activities and readiness for ... - Projekti-Instituutti

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Theoretical background<br />

program should confirm that potential “buyers” exist <strong>for</strong> the program<br />

outputs within the organizational environment.<br />

Previous research has acknowledged that internal change projects <strong>and</strong><br />

programs are especially interesting in terms of their interaction with the<br />

organizational context (Johansson et al., 2007). Blomquist <strong>and</strong> Packendorff<br />

(1998) describe change projects <strong>and</strong> programs as the most embedded kind<br />

of temporary organizations. An internal change program aims at changing<br />

the parent organization <strong>and</strong> gains its resources <strong>and</strong> the entire reason <strong>for</strong><br />

existence from it. As Pellegrinelli (1997) states, a program operates on the<br />

existing structures, systems <strong>and</strong> procedures to trans<strong>for</strong>m or replace them.<br />

The managerial structures <strong>and</strong> procedures of some organizations may also<br />

constrain programs (Ferns, 1991). Furthermore, Huy (2002) notes how it<br />

may be a considerable challenge to balance between achieving change <strong>and</strong><br />

maintaining operational continuity during radical organizational<br />

trans<strong>for</strong>mation. The attempted change typically requires considerable<br />

ef<strong>for</strong>ts from the recipients, as change deals with people’s behaviors, not<br />

only with tangible deliverables (Pellegrinelli, 2002). Adding to the<br />

complexity, the participation in a change program can be part-time<br />

(Eskerod & Jepsen, 2005), <strong>and</strong> the program staff may themselves represent<br />

the clients or “users” of the attempted change, besides their roles as<br />

planners, “sellers”, <strong>and</strong> implementers of change (Andersen, 2000). The<br />

present study examines this complex interplay between a change program<br />

<strong>and</strong> its parent organization in detail.<br />

2.3.4 Integration or isolation?<br />

Within organization theory <strong>and</strong> management studies, the relationships <strong>and</strong><br />

connections between organizational entities have typically been examined<br />

as integration. Integration has been viewed as the process of achieving<br />

unity of ef<strong>for</strong>t among the various subsystems (Lawrence & Lorsch, 1967), as<br />

collaboration (Ledwith & Coughlan, 2005), coordination (Martinez &<br />

Jarillo, 1989) <strong>and</strong> communication (Griffin & Hauser, 1996). Integration<br />

may deal with any of the organization’s components, such as departments,<br />

functions, processes, systems, people, <strong>and</strong> technology. Integration can be<br />

achieved through diverse solutions <strong>and</strong> integration mechanisms (Griffin &<br />

Hauser, 1996; Martinez & Jarillo, 1989). Research on organizational<br />

integration has examined integration within <strong>and</strong> between organizations.<br />

Studies on intra-organizational integration have primarily centered on<br />

integration between organizational units or functions (Griffin & Hauser,<br />

1996; Nihtilä, 1999; Souder & Moenaert, 1992; Turkulainen, 2008), or<br />

integrating knowledge or technologies into an organization (Becker &<br />

Zirpoli, 2003; Carlile & Rebentish, 2003). External integration has been<br />

studied as supplier integration (e.g. Koufteros, Cheng, & Lai, 2007;<br />

55

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!