Boundary activities and readiness for ... - Projekti-Instituutti
Boundary activities and readiness for ... - Projekti-Instituutti
Boundary activities and readiness for ... - Projekti-Instituutti
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Theoretical background<br />
pamphlets, bulletin boards, posters, web-sites, briefing sessions, <strong>and</strong><br />
in<strong>for</strong>mal communication (Russ, 2008).<br />
An important part of the early communication is the announcement of the<br />
<strong>for</strong>thcoming change. In the case of complex changes, the actual effects of<br />
change may be largely unknown, which makes it difficult to communicate<br />
the change to others (Smeltzer & Zener, 1993). Also, it may be challenging<br />
to engage in a discussion of difficult or even painful issues related to change<br />
(Beer & Eisenstat, 1996). Still, if a major change ef<strong>for</strong>t is not announced<br />
early, the employees are often able to sense the signals that a change is<br />
approaching (Smeltzer & Zener, 1993). If the announcement is postponed<br />
<strong>and</strong> communication is restricted, rumors can be expected, possibly<br />
promoting a negative climate (Klein, 1996; Smeltzer & Zener, 1993).<br />
Besides announcing change, early change-related communication aims at<br />
explaining the rationale <strong>and</strong> goals of the change ef<strong>for</strong>t, <strong>and</strong> developing <strong>and</strong><br />
describing the involved plans <strong>and</strong> procedures (Klein, 1996). Marks (2007)<br />
argues that the participants of change should be fully educated about the<br />
necessity <strong>for</strong> change, the benefits related to it, the progress, <strong>and</strong> the related<br />
problems. The importance of dialogue has also been highlighted (Russ,<br />
2008). Although extensive communication is typically recommended,<br />
Smeltzer <strong>and</strong> Zener (1993) note that one should not provide too much<br />
in<strong>for</strong>mation during the early stage of change, as it may result in<br />
unnecessary controversy <strong>and</strong> confusion.<br />
The last success factor is sustaining the momentum <strong>for</strong> change. Many<br />
authors warn about losing the momentum after the initial enthusiasm (e.g.<br />
Armenakis & Harris, 2002; Bruch et al., 2005; Cox, 1995). In large change<br />
programs, the initiation <strong>and</strong> planning stage may take years, <strong>and</strong> thus the<br />
managers of change need to put ef<strong>for</strong>t into actively sustaining the<br />
momentum. Stjernberg <strong>and</strong> Philips (1993) note how the legitimacy of<br />
change has to be continuously regenerated <strong>and</strong> sustained. The managers<br />
also need to ensure employees that the change is given priority <strong>and</strong> kept<br />
permanently present (Bruch et al., 2005).<br />
One of the most commonly suggested tactics of sustaining the momentum<br />
is the introduction of so-called quick wins (Gill, 2003; Kotter, 1995; Marks,<br />
2007), referring to visible benefits that are demonstrated early in the<br />
change process. Such short-term wins need to be systematically planned in<br />
advance <strong>and</strong> when achieved, made visible to the larger audience. In large<br />
change programs, a common tactic is to establish pilot projects that<br />
introduce the change first to just one unit or group be<strong>for</strong>e spreading it to<br />
the entire organization (Spencer & Sofer, 1964; Turner, 2005). If a pilot<br />
project is successful, it may help sustain the momentum <strong>and</strong> ensure others<br />
of the feasibility of change. The overall pace of change is also important.<br />
46