02.07.2015 Views

Boundary activities and readiness for ... - Projekti-Instituutti

Boundary activities and readiness for ... - Projekti-Instituutti

Boundary activities and readiness for ... - Projekti-Instituutti

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Theoretical background<br />

pamphlets, bulletin boards, posters, web-sites, briefing sessions, <strong>and</strong><br />

in<strong>for</strong>mal communication (Russ, 2008).<br />

An important part of the early communication is the announcement of the<br />

<strong>for</strong>thcoming change. In the case of complex changes, the actual effects of<br />

change may be largely unknown, which makes it difficult to communicate<br />

the change to others (Smeltzer & Zener, 1993). Also, it may be challenging<br />

to engage in a discussion of difficult or even painful issues related to change<br />

(Beer & Eisenstat, 1996). Still, if a major change ef<strong>for</strong>t is not announced<br />

early, the employees are often able to sense the signals that a change is<br />

approaching (Smeltzer & Zener, 1993). If the announcement is postponed<br />

<strong>and</strong> communication is restricted, rumors can be expected, possibly<br />

promoting a negative climate (Klein, 1996; Smeltzer & Zener, 1993).<br />

Besides announcing change, early change-related communication aims at<br />

explaining the rationale <strong>and</strong> goals of the change ef<strong>for</strong>t, <strong>and</strong> developing <strong>and</strong><br />

describing the involved plans <strong>and</strong> procedures (Klein, 1996). Marks (2007)<br />

argues that the participants of change should be fully educated about the<br />

necessity <strong>for</strong> change, the benefits related to it, the progress, <strong>and</strong> the related<br />

problems. The importance of dialogue has also been highlighted (Russ,<br />

2008). Although extensive communication is typically recommended,<br />

Smeltzer <strong>and</strong> Zener (1993) note that one should not provide too much<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation during the early stage of change, as it may result in<br />

unnecessary controversy <strong>and</strong> confusion.<br />

The last success factor is sustaining the momentum <strong>for</strong> change. Many<br />

authors warn about losing the momentum after the initial enthusiasm (e.g.<br />

Armenakis & Harris, 2002; Bruch et al., 2005; Cox, 1995). In large change<br />

programs, the initiation <strong>and</strong> planning stage may take years, <strong>and</strong> thus the<br />

managers of change need to put ef<strong>for</strong>t into actively sustaining the<br />

momentum. Stjernberg <strong>and</strong> Philips (1993) note how the legitimacy of<br />

change has to be continuously regenerated <strong>and</strong> sustained. The managers<br />

also need to ensure employees that the change is given priority <strong>and</strong> kept<br />

permanently present (Bruch et al., 2005).<br />

One of the most commonly suggested tactics of sustaining the momentum<br />

is the introduction of so-called quick wins (Gill, 2003; Kotter, 1995; Marks,<br />

2007), referring to visible benefits that are demonstrated early in the<br />

change process. Such short-term wins need to be systematically planned in<br />

advance <strong>and</strong> when achieved, made visible to the larger audience. In large<br />

change programs, a common tactic is to establish pilot projects that<br />

introduce the change first to just one unit or group be<strong>for</strong>e spreading it to<br />

the entire organization (Spencer & Sofer, 1964; Turner, 2005). If a pilot<br />

project is successful, it may help sustain the momentum <strong>and</strong> ensure others<br />

of the feasibility of change. The overall pace of change is also important.<br />

46

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!