Boundary activities and readiness for ... - Projekti-Instituutti
Boundary activities and readiness for ... - Projekti-Instituutti
Boundary activities and readiness for ... - Projekti-Instituutti
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Theoretical background<br />
plans should be open-ended to a certain degree to leave room <strong>for</strong><br />
spontaneity, creativity, <strong>and</strong> learning.<br />
Ensuring resources<br />
The second set of success factors relates to the different kinds of (human)<br />
resources that must be acquired or ensured during the early stage of<br />
change. Firstly, the importance of a skillful <strong>and</strong> charismatic leader is<br />
largely recognized (Fern<strong>and</strong>ez & Rainey, 2006; Gill, 2003), especially<br />
concerning radical change (Lok et al., 2005). The characteristics, abilities,<br />
<strong>and</strong> <strong>activities</strong> of change leaders have attracted considerable research<br />
attention (e.g. Kahn, 1995; Woodward & Hendry, 2004). Organizational<br />
change is said to require charismatic leadership (Nadler & Tushman, 1990;<br />
Wang, Chou, & Jiang, 2005) or trans<strong>for</strong>mational leadership (Eisenbach et<br />
al., 1999). According to Nadler <strong>and</strong> Tushman (1990), charismatic<br />
leadership is about envisioning, energizing <strong>and</strong> enabling <strong>and</strong> it includes<br />
<strong>activities</strong> such as communicating the vision <strong>and</strong> motivating the<br />
participants. The leader of a change ef<strong>for</strong>t also needs a sufficient<br />
underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the content of change to ensure required credibility <strong>and</strong><br />
ability to manage the change ef<strong>for</strong>t (Mikkelsen et al., 1991). Nadler <strong>and</strong><br />
Tushman (1990) describe this side as instrumental leadership which<br />
focuses on managing structures <strong>and</strong> processes <strong>and</strong> includes <strong>activities</strong> such<br />
as setting goals, defining roles <strong>and</strong> responsibilities, creating control<br />
procedures, <strong>and</strong> rewarding participants.<br />
Diverging views concerning the leadership of change have also been<br />
presented. Nutt <strong>and</strong> Backoff (1993) suggest blurring the leader-follower<br />
distinction <strong>and</strong> giving up hierarchical control to achieve the required<br />
commitment. Similarly, Karp <strong>and</strong> Helgø (2008) encourage the leaders to<br />
embrace the uncertainty <strong>and</strong> chaos related to change by loosening control,<br />
<strong>and</strong> by valuing communication, sensemaking, <strong>and</strong> self-governing. The<br />
leaders’ role, then, is to serve as a role model <strong>and</strong> facilitate conversations<br />
<strong>and</strong> interactions (ibid.). Adding to this view, Nutt <strong>and</strong> Backoff (1993)<br />
discuss path clearing, which refers to the leader’s actions in helping the<br />
followers by removing barriers that limit the adoption of changes.<br />
A successful change program also requires a dedicated <strong>and</strong> powerful<br />
program team. Although a change ef<strong>for</strong>t may begin with just one or two<br />
people, some minimum mass of committed people must be recruited early<br />
in the ef<strong>for</strong>t (Kotter, 1995). The project-oriented literature describes the<br />
project or program team members as those planning <strong>and</strong> implementing the<br />
change (e.g. Lanning, 2001). While change management authors often do<br />
not explicitly refer to a project or program team, they frequently describe<br />
the need <strong>for</strong> dedicated resources <strong>for</strong> managing a change ef<strong>for</strong>t (e.g.<br />
42