02.07.2015 Views

Boundary activities and readiness for ... - Projekti-Instituutti

Boundary activities and readiness for ... - Projekti-Instituutti

Boundary activities and readiness for ... - Projekti-Instituutti

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Theoretical background<br />

As the early program stage involves significant levels of uncertainty <strong>and</strong><br />

ambiguity (Thiry, 2004a, 2004b), initiation <strong>and</strong> planning <strong>activities</strong> of a<br />

program differ from smaller <strong>and</strong> more clearly defined projects. Converting<br />

from traditional project management, program management models<br />

describe how specific objectives may not be known when programs are<br />

established, but they may start with abstract visions <strong>and</strong> goals, <strong>and</strong> the<br />

more specific objectives are elaborated <strong>and</strong> adjusted along the journey as<br />

the program evolves in line with the business needs <strong>and</strong> environmental<br />

conditions (Pellegrinelli, 1997; Thiry, 2004b). Initial definitions provide a<br />

general path <strong>for</strong> the program, but iteration <strong>and</strong> changes are to be expected<br />

during the later stages (Lehner, 2009).<br />

Program management literature describes the program plan as the main<br />

output of the early program stage. In general, program <strong>and</strong> project plans<br />

are attempts to define the intended future (Atkinson et al., 2006), <strong>and</strong> they<br />

influence tradeoffs <strong>and</strong> priorities (Graham, 2000). Plans also have other<br />

purposes: they reduce uncertainty by their very existence <strong>and</strong> they<br />

legitimize action (Lundin & Söderholm, 1995). Especially in change<br />

programs it is often not the plan itself that is important, but rather the<br />

planning activity <strong>and</strong> the related learning (Yeo, 1995). Correspondingly,<br />

Thiry (2002, 2004a) stresses the importance of feedback <strong>and</strong> learning <strong>and</strong><br />

argues that program initiation is more a question of sensemaking, intuition,<br />

<strong>and</strong> creativity than planning <strong>and</strong> control. Lehner (2009) similarly describes<br />

how planning in dynamic <strong>and</strong> uncertain situations involves large amounts<br />

of in<strong>for</strong>mation gathering, cooperation <strong>and</strong> integration of people with<br />

different backgrounds, <strong>and</strong> is mainly a process of interpretation. Craw<strong>for</strong>d<br />

<strong>and</strong> Pollack (2004) suggest that since change initiatives (projects <strong>and</strong><br />

programs) tend to involve ill-defined goals <strong>and</strong> methods, they require soft<br />

systems thinking. Such soft methods acknowledge goal ambiguity by<br />

focusing on problem definition, exploration <strong>and</strong> learning <strong>and</strong> place<br />

emphasis on negotiation, debate <strong>and</strong> accommodation.<br />

Although the special nature <strong>and</strong> challenges related to early program<br />

stages are largely reported, there is very limited research evidence of the<br />

actual practices in establishing <strong>and</strong> planning change programs. Conceptual<br />

literature concerning the early program <strong>and</strong> project stages has listed early<br />

<strong>activities</strong> such as business case development, selection of management<br />

<strong>activities</strong>, design of the program organization, program plan creation, <strong>and</strong><br />

identification <strong>and</strong> allocation of resources (e.g. Murray-Webster & Thiry,<br />

2000). Many of these <strong>activities</strong> involve cooperation with people external to<br />

the program team. The influence of the various stakeholder groups is<br />

emphasized during the early stage, as they may have different <strong>and</strong> even<br />

conflicting interests <strong>and</strong> ambitions towards the program (Kolltveit &<br />

26

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!