Boundary activities and readiness for ... - Projekti-Instituutti
Boundary activities and readiness for ... - Projekti-Instituutti
Boundary activities and readiness for ... - Projekti-Instituutti
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Categories <strong>and</strong> types of<br />
boundary <strong>activities</strong><br />
Description of the activity in the case Examples of quotes Frequency<br />
(total:<br />
531 quotes)<br />
% of<br />
<strong>activities</strong><br />
Category III: Crossing the boundary outwards 80 40%<br />
In<strong>for</strong>ming There were various methods <strong>for</strong> communication both at the<br />
program level <strong>and</strong> project level, including seminars,<br />
personnel meetings, <strong>and</strong> utilizing the personnel magazine<br />
<strong>and</strong> the intranet in communication.<br />
Sub-program manager: ”In the beginning, we in<strong>for</strong>med people<br />
about the existence <strong>and</strong> participants of this [project], we had<br />
discussions, we prepared some material <strong>for</strong> communications <strong>and</strong><br />
we also held a briefing session.”<br />
151 28%<br />
Legitimating <strong>and</strong> committing Some legitimating <strong>and</strong> committing <strong>activities</strong> were found,<br />
mainly related to legitimating some distinct changes in the<br />
eyes of Chain’s personnel.<br />
Program owner: “During the past year, I have probably spent 60–<br />
70% of my work time with this program … we made this one-time<br />
ef<strong>for</strong>t to spread this model to the field <strong>and</strong> to launch it by<br />
demonstrating top management commitment by going through the<br />
local units.”<br />
53 10%<br />
Influencing Just a few influencing <strong>activities</strong> were found. As an<br />
example, the program started to have un<strong>for</strong>eseen effects to<br />
Chain’s product portfolio. The program’s steering group<br />
also became an attractive <strong>for</strong>um <strong>for</strong> other than programrelated<br />
issues that were waiting <strong>for</strong> a decision.<br />
Program manager: ”Sometimes I have even had to remind the<br />
program steering group that this about a change program <strong>and</strong> we<br />
make project-related decisions here … Since this steering group<br />
works so well, there has appeared a tendency to bring issues there<br />
<strong>for</strong> discussion that actually are not at all related to this.”<br />
7 1%<br />
Category IV: Blocking the boundary 44 8%<br />
Guarding Just a few guarding ef<strong>for</strong>ts were found, mainly related to<br />
scoping certain aspects out of the program or purposefully<br />
restricting the size of the project groups to ensure efficient<br />
operation.<br />
Support team manager: “I have been a bit surprised that the Sales<br />
department is not included in this program, but it’s not up to me to<br />
decide this.”<br />
10 2%<br />
Enclosing Enclosing ef<strong>for</strong>ts focused on keeping confidential<br />
scenarios about the <strong>for</strong>thcoming changes within a small<br />
group of people. Communication required careful<br />
measures, since the program aimed at cost cuts by reducing<br />
the number of personnel <strong>and</strong> cutting down some local<br />
operations. These scenarios could not be shared with the<br />
personnel during the early program phases.<br />
Development area director <strong>and</strong> original program owner: “I think<br />
we have [communicated the plans] quite openly, except that<br />
naturally we have not told the specific figures of how many people<br />
will be affected or how much we have to decrease personnel.”<br />
34 6%