02.07.2015 Views

Boundary activities and readiness for ... - Projekti-Instituutti

Boundary activities and readiness for ... - Projekti-Instituutti

Boundary activities and readiness for ... - Projekti-Instituutti

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Categories <strong>and</strong> types of<br />

boundary <strong>activities</strong><br />

Description of the activity in the case Examples of quotes Frequency<br />

(total:<br />

531 quotes)<br />

% of<br />

<strong>activities</strong><br />

Category III: Crossing the boundary outwards 80 40%<br />

In<strong>for</strong>ming There were various methods <strong>for</strong> communication both at the<br />

program level <strong>and</strong> project level, including seminars,<br />

personnel meetings, <strong>and</strong> utilizing the personnel magazine<br />

<strong>and</strong> the intranet in communication.<br />

Sub-program manager: ”In the beginning, we in<strong>for</strong>med people<br />

about the existence <strong>and</strong> participants of this [project], we had<br />

discussions, we prepared some material <strong>for</strong> communications <strong>and</strong><br />

we also held a briefing session.”<br />

151 28%<br />

Legitimating <strong>and</strong> committing Some legitimating <strong>and</strong> committing <strong>activities</strong> were found,<br />

mainly related to legitimating some distinct changes in the<br />

eyes of Chain’s personnel.<br />

Program owner: “During the past year, I have probably spent 60–<br />

70% of my work time with this program … we made this one-time<br />

ef<strong>for</strong>t to spread this model to the field <strong>and</strong> to launch it by<br />

demonstrating top management commitment by going through the<br />

local units.”<br />

53 10%<br />

Influencing Just a few influencing <strong>activities</strong> were found. As an<br />

example, the program started to have un<strong>for</strong>eseen effects to<br />

Chain’s product portfolio. The program’s steering group<br />

also became an attractive <strong>for</strong>um <strong>for</strong> other than programrelated<br />

issues that were waiting <strong>for</strong> a decision.<br />

Program manager: ”Sometimes I have even had to remind the<br />

program steering group that this about a change program <strong>and</strong> we<br />

make project-related decisions here … Since this steering group<br />

works so well, there has appeared a tendency to bring issues there<br />

<strong>for</strong> discussion that actually are not at all related to this.”<br />

7 1%<br />

Category IV: Blocking the boundary 44 8%<br />

Guarding Just a few guarding ef<strong>for</strong>ts were found, mainly related to<br />

scoping certain aspects out of the program or purposefully<br />

restricting the size of the project groups to ensure efficient<br />

operation.<br />

Support team manager: “I have been a bit surprised that the Sales<br />

department is not included in this program, but it’s not up to me to<br />

decide this.”<br />

10 2%<br />

Enclosing Enclosing ef<strong>for</strong>ts focused on keeping confidential<br />

scenarios about the <strong>for</strong>thcoming changes within a small<br />

group of people. Communication required careful<br />

measures, since the program aimed at cost cuts by reducing<br />

the number of personnel <strong>and</strong> cutting down some local<br />

operations. These scenarios could not be shared with the<br />

personnel during the early program phases.<br />

Development area director <strong>and</strong> original program owner: “I think<br />

we have [communicated the plans] quite openly, except that<br />

naturally we have not told the specific figures of how many people<br />

will be affected or how much we have to decrease personnel.”<br />

34 6%

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!