02.07.2015 Views

Boundary activities and readiness for ... - Projekti-Instituutti

Boundary activities and readiness for ... - Projekti-Instituutti

Boundary activities and readiness for ... - Projekti-Instituutti

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Categories <strong>and</strong> types of<br />

boundary <strong>activities</strong><br />

Description of the activity in the case Examples of quotes Frequency<br />

(total:<br />

187 quotes)<br />

% of<br />

<strong>activities</strong><br />

Category III: Crossing the boundary outwards 80 43%<br />

In<strong>for</strong>ming In<strong>for</strong>ming <strong>activities</strong> focused on reporting the program’s<br />

progress according to the management system of the<br />

organization, <strong>and</strong> communicating about the <strong>for</strong>thcoming<br />

changes to the personnel.<br />

Middle manager of a central unit involved in the program: “This<br />

has been communicated quite much also to the top management of<br />

[a business division], so they are quite well on board about how<br />

this goes.”<br />

39 21%<br />

Legitimating <strong>and</strong> committing There were active legitimating <strong>and</strong> committing ef<strong>for</strong>ts,<br />

which related firstly to lobbying the program idea to top<br />

management <strong>and</strong> after that to getting a wider support <strong>for</strong><br />

the program by participating people throughout Bureau in<br />

the current state analysis <strong>and</strong> program planning <strong>activities</strong>.<br />

Program manager: ”[The original program owner] took care of<br />

the external relations, meaning that he sold this program to<br />

[Bureau’s] top management <strong>and</strong> acquired the m<strong>and</strong>ate to do this…<br />

<strong>and</strong> he also built awareness of this program.”<br />

34 18%<br />

Influencing There were some influencing <strong>activities</strong>, related to paving<br />

the way <strong>for</strong> other change ef<strong>for</strong>ts in the organization <strong>and</strong><br />

developing the organization’s IT policies beyond the scope<br />

of the program.<br />

Support team manager: ”This [support project] has also supported<br />

operations management <strong>and</strong> its development in whole [Bureau]…<br />

It has contributed to the development of the IT support of these<br />

processes <strong>and</strong> the processes themselves.”<br />

7 4%<br />

Category IV: Blocking the boundary 10 5%<br />

Guarding Some guarding <strong>activities</strong> were found, mainly related to<br />

isolating the program by deciding not to apply certain<br />

organizational control procedures in the program.<br />

Project participant: “There is this [project audit procedure] that<br />

should in principle be applied to all IT programs, projects <strong>and</strong><br />

systems … But this is like the shoemaker’s son going barefoot: the<br />

projects in [the program] have not followed [the policy].”<br />

7 4%<br />

Enclosing Just a few enclosing <strong>activities</strong> were found, mainly related<br />

to one of the projects that had been very autonomous <strong>and</strong><br />

had not reported to anyone.<br />

Project manager: “From the beginning we realized that if we do<br />

[this project] with a low profile, we will get fewer comments from<br />

others. Thus we started to do this very independently, keeping a<br />

low profile, <strong>and</strong> we don’t really report to anyone either. … It<br />

provides us with freedom <strong>and</strong> enables fast operation.”<br />

3 2%

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!