Boundary activities and readiness for ... - Projekti-Instituutti
Boundary activities and readiness for ... - Projekti-Instituutti
Boundary activities and readiness for ... - Projekti-Instituutti
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Introduction<br />
in<strong>for</strong>mation on the planned changes <strong>and</strong> their progress <strong>and</strong> by engaging<br />
people in the change-related <strong>activities</strong> (Armenakis et al., 1993; Armenakis<br />
<strong>and</strong> Harris, 2002). The majority of studies on <strong>readiness</strong> <strong>for</strong> change have<br />
examined <strong>readiness</strong> either as a psychological state measured by surveying<br />
the employee attitudes <strong>and</strong> beliefs (e.g. Armenakis et al., 1993; Jones et al.,<br />
2005) or as the organization’s general capacity <strong>for</strong> implementing changes<br />
(e.g. Jansen, 2000). In this dissertation, the concept of <strong>readiness</strong> <strong>for</strong> change<br />
is applied to the context of multi-project change programs by examining<br />
how the <strong>activities</strong> of program initiation build <strong>readiness</strong> <strong>for</strong> implementing<br />
the change program.<br />
The current study takes the perspective of a program team that is put in<br />
charge of initiating, planning <strong>and</strong> managing a large-scale change program.<br />
The aim is to explore how <strong>readiness</strong> <strong>for</strong> change program implementation is<br />
promoted by this core team’s actions. The program is viewed as an<br />
emerging temporary organization that interacts with its permanent parent<br />
organization (e.g. Andersen, 2006; 2008; Ekstedt et al., 1999). To study<br />
this interaction, the concepts of organizational boundaries (Leifer &<br />
Delbecq, 1978; Scott, 2003; Thompson, 1967) <strong>and</strong> boundary spanning<br />
(Aldrich & Herker, 1977; Jemison, 1984) are adopted from organization<br />
theory. Prior research has described how the boundaries of organizational<br />
entities must be constantly maintained <strong>and</strong> managed (e.g. Ancona &<br />
Caldwell, 1988; 1992a; Miller & Rice, 1967; Scott, 2003). The present study<br />
examines the <strong>activities</strong> that the key actors of an emerging temporary<br />
organization, a change program, employ in managing the program’s<br />
relations with its parent organization. As these <strong>activities</strong> not only span the<br />
program’s boundaries but also build <strong>and</strong> guard them (Yan & Louis, 1999), a<br />
term boundary <strong>activities</strong> is utilized to refer to all such actions. The aim of<br />
this dissertation is to explore the core program team’s boundary <strong>activities</strong><br />
through which the emerging program’s boundaries are defined,<br />
strengthened, bridged <strong>and</strong> guarded. <strong>Boundary</strong> <strong>activities</strong> have been studied<br />
earlier in the contexts of product development teams (Ancona & Caldwell,<br />
1992a), work teams led by external team leaders (Druskat & Wheeler,<br />
2003), <strong>and</strong> community groups involved in delivery projects (Kellogg,<br />
Orlikowski, & Yates, 2006), but prior research has not explicitly addressed<br />
the boundary <strong>activities</strong> of change programs.<br />
Although project management literature has mainly focused on<br />
interactions <strong>and</strong> integration within a project, the early publications already<br />
acknowledged the need to manage the project’s external relations. Among<br />
the very earliest project management publications is the article “The project<br />
Manager” by Paul O. Gaddis, which was published in Harvard Business<br />
Review in 1959. Gaddis described the duties <strong>and</strong> qualities of project<br />
4