Boundary activities and readiness for ... - Projekti-Instituutti
Boundary activities and readiness for ... - Projekti-Instituutti
Boundary activities and readiness for ... - Projekti-Instituutti
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Introduction<br />
structures <strong>and</strong> processes <strong>for</strong> program implementation, in addition to<br />
linking the emerging program with the wider organizational context.<br />
This study is based on the notion that change programs are embedded in<br />
their parent organizations <strong>and</strong> in constant interaction with their<br />
organizational context. Although project management research has<br />
traditionally viewed projects as isolated entities, recent studies have<br />
encouraged researchers to examine projects <strong>and</strong> programs in their context<br />
(Engwall, 2003; Jensen, Johansson, & Löfström, 2006; Pellegrinelli,<br />
Partington, Hemingway, Mohdzain, & Shah, 2007). In particular, previous<br />
research has shown how projects <strong>and</strong> programs are linked to their parent<br />
organization through their goals, structures, locations, processes,<br />
technologies, resources, routines <strong>and</strong> knowledge (e.g. Heller, 1999;<br />
Lakemond & Berggren, 2006). The interaction between a change program<br />
<strong>and</strong> its parent organization is particularly interesting, since the program<br />
aims at changing the parent organization whilst receiving its resources <strong>and</strong><br />
the entire reason <strong>for</strong> existence from the parent. Adding to the complexity,<br />
the participation in the program may be part-time, <strong>and</strong> the program staff<br />
may simultaneously act as the recipients of the changes generated by the<br />
program. Change programs are both influenced by <strong>and</strong> seek to influence<br />
their organizational contexts (Pellegrinelli et al., 2007), highlighting the<br />
need to actively manage the program’s external relations.<br />
The interplay between a change program <strong>and</strong> its parent organization is<br />
especially interesting during the early stage of a program. Large change<br />
ef<strong>for</strong>ts tend to be truly unique <strong>and</strong> there is often little prior experience<br />
guiding the <strong>activities</strong> (Ekstedt, Lundin, Söderholm, & Wirdenius, 1999).<br />
Different stakeholders within the parent organization have distinct interests<br />
<strong>and</strong> expectations towards the program, <strong>and</strong> aligning these views may be a<br />
considerable challenge (Thiry, 2004a). During the early program stage, the<br />
emerging program needs to be set up, assigned resources, distinguished as<br />
a legitimate organizational entity, <strong>and</strong> given its own place in the larger<br />
organizational context (Lundin & Söderholm, 1995). The key challenge of<br />
program initiation is to create a proper foundation <strong>for</strong> the <strong>for</strong>thcoming<br />
change.<br />
Literature on organizational change management has recognized the<br />
importance of giving a change endeavor a proper start (e.g. Bruch, Gerber,<br />
& Maier, 2005; Gioia & Chittipeddi, 1991; Howes & Quinn, 1978; Kotter,<br />
1995). In recent years, a growing number of studies have approached this<br />
challenge as ensuring <strong>readiness</strong> <strong>for</strong> change (e.g. Armenakis, Harris &<br />
Mossholder, 1993; Armenakis & Harris, 2002; By, 2007; Jones, Jimmieson,<br />
& Griffiths, 2005; Weiner, Amick, & Lee, 2008). Research has suggested<br />
that <strong>readiness</strong> <strong>for</strong> change may be created <strong>and</strong> promoted e.g. by providing<br />
3