02.07.2015 Views

Boundary activities and readiness for ... - Projekti-Instituutti

Boundary activities and readiness for ... - Projekti-Instituutti

Boundary activities and readiness for ... - Projekti-Instituutti

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Results<br />

organizations offered further to their customers. The program was<br />

supposed to involve practically all of Center’s ten units <strong>and</strong> seven<br />

subsidiaries <strong>and</strong> it aimed to impact many stakeholders, including but not<br />

limited to the member organizations, legislation, regional <strong>and</strong> national<br />

government, local subcontractors, <strong>and</strong> other partners. The program also<br />

aimed to contribute to Center’s internal development by providing<br />

mechanisms <strong>for</strong> coordinating cross-functional <strong>activities</strong>, as the initial goals<br />

of the change program also included the adoption of the program<br />

management approach <strong>and</strong> the development of program management<br />

practices in Center.<br />

After the launch decision had been made by the management group, the<br />

search <strong>for</strong> a competent program manager begun. From early on, there were<br />

different views about the position <strong>and</strong> it seemed hard to find a suitable<br />

person. When the unit manager of R&D refused the position due to the lack<br />

of time to devote to the program, some top managers suggested that the<br />

program manager could be found outside Center, among the top managers<br />

of Center’s member organizations. Still, after a lengthy search, a senior<br />

expert from Center’s R&D unit was appointed as the program manager,<br />

although he was not very willing to accept the position. The actual program<br />

work was to be implemented largely in the line organization <strong>and</strong> by various<br />

service development projects, <strong>and</strong> the program manager’s role was<br />

supposed to be rather coordinative, lacking significant authority. Reflecting<br />

this, the program manager was not admitted the title <strong>for</strong> a program<br />

manager commonly in use in other Finnish organizations [Ohjelmajohtaja<br />

in Finnish] but was instead appointed as “the manager of the program”<br />

[Ohjelman johtaja in Finnish] that would not indicate a high-ranking<br />

managerial position in the line organization.<br />

One of Center’s vice presidents was appointed as the program owner to<br />

oversee the program. A coordination group consisting mainly of Center’s<br />

unit managers was established to oversee the development of the program,<br />

<strong>and</strong> a part-time program coordinator was also appointed. During the<br />

program initiation, three focus areas, or sub-programs, were chosen <strong>and</strong><br />

more detailed goals, plans, resources <strong>and</strong> expected outputs <strong>for</strong> each of these<br />

sub-programs were being planned separately. For each sub-program, a<br />

manager was nominated to guide the planning. The core program team<br />

included the program manager, the managers of the sub-programs, the<br />

program coordinator, <strong>and</strong> the manager of the R&D unit. Everyone worked<br />

in the program in addition to their normal duties in Center’s functional<br />

units. Figure 8 illustrates the initial structure of Center’s program.<br />

103

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!