- Page 1:
DepartmentofIndustrialEngineeringan
- Page 4 and 5:
Supervisor Professor Karlos Artto I
- Page 7:
Tiivistelmä Aalto-yliopisto, PL 11
- Page 10 and 11:
I would also like to thank many oth
- Page 12 and 13:
4.3 Boundary activities at the prog
- Page 14 and 15:
List of tables Table 1 Comparison o
- Page 16 and 17:
Introduction require different mana
- Page 18 and 19:
Introduction information on the pla
- Page 20 and 21:
Introduction activities contribute
- Page 22 and 23:
Introduction spanned and protected
- Page 24 and 25:
Theoretical background 2. Theoretic
- Page 26 and 27:
Theoretical background management i
- Page 28 and 29:
Theoretical background (Grabher, 20
- Page 30 and 31:
Theoretical background require coll
- Page 32 and 33:
Theoretical background 2.1.2 Defini
- Page 34 and 35:
Theoretical background on large pro
- Page 36 and 37:
Theoretical background to the progr
- Page 38 and 39:
Theoretical background detailed pla
- Page 40 and 41:
Theoretical background As the early
- Page 42 and 43:
Theoretical background organization
- Page 44 and 45:
Theoretical background Although man
- Page 46 and 47:
Theoretical background The multipli
- Page 48 and 49:
Theoretical background types of cha
- Page 50 and 51:
Theoretical background disruption o
- Page 52 and 53:
Theoretical background the impact o
- Page 54 and 55:
Theoretical background change, unre
- Page 56 and 57:
Theoretical background plans should
- Page 58 and 59:
Theoretical background Rainey, 2006
- Page 60 and 61:
Theoretical background pamphlets, b
- Page 62 and 63: Theoretical background change capac
- Page 64 and 65: Theoretical background change proce
- Page 66 and 67: Theoretical background (2005) descr
- Page 68 and 69: Theoretical background Similarly, p
- Page 70 and 71: Theoretical background Petersen, Ha
- Page 72 and 73: Theoretical background already duri
- Page 74 and 75: Theoretical background physically i
- Page 76 and 77: Theoretical background environment.
- Page 78 and 79: Theoretical background satisfaction
- Page 80 and 81: Theoretical background As can be se
- Page 82 and 83: Theoretical background directional:
- Page 84 and 85: Theoretical background Delbecq, 197
- Page 86 and 87: Theoretical background managed. Wit
- Page 88 and 89: Theoretical background change progr
- Page 90 and 91: Theoretical background of each type
- Page 92 and 93: Research methodology and data 3. Re
- Page 94 and 95: Research methodology and data chara
- Page 96 and 97: Research methodology and data theor
- Page 98 and 99: Research methodology and data As al
- Page 100 and 101: Research methodology and data In li
- Page 102 and 103: Research methodology and data and p
- Page 104 and 105: Research methodology and data termi
- Page 106 and 107: Research methodology and data main
- Page 108 and 109: Research methodology and data progr
- Page 110 and 111: Research methodology and data point
- Page 114 and 115: Research methodology and data activ
- Page 116 and 117: Results Center has a long tradition
- Page 118 and 119: Results Figure 8 The program struct
- Page 120 and 121: Results made the change extremely c
- Page 122 and 123: Results from Bureau’s various uni
- Page 124 and 125: Results Figure 9 The program struct
- Page 126 and 127: Results “Domain” (a pseudonym).
- Page 128 and 129: Results Instead of an official prog
- Page 130 and 131: Results program was seen to be on t
- Page 132 and 133: Results Figure 11 Illustration of t
- Page 134 and 135: Results Q4 (Center, program manager
- Page 136 and 137: Results Q8 (Bureau, project partici
- Page 138 and 139: Results stronger during the course
- Page 140 and 141: Results personnel of the local unit
- Page 142 and 143: Results Figure 12 Different types o
- Page 144 and 145: Results planning. Information seeki
- Page 146 and 147: Results practice, guarding activiti
- Page 148 and 149: Results Table 14 Comparison of boun
- Page 150 and 151: Results categories, based on the ac
- Page 152 and 153: Results 4.4 Readiness for change pr
- Page 154 and 155: Results In case Center, the overall
- Page 156 and 157: Results Q42 (Center, top manager):
- Page 158 and 159: Results daily work to take care of
- Page 160 and 161: Results work. At the time of the se
- Page 162 and 163:
Results view of readiness for chang
- Page 164 and 165:
Results Table 17 Identified associa
- Page 166 and 167:
Results has been vital to show that
- Page 168 and 169:
Results Table 18 Identified associa
- Page 170 and 171:
Results this fall we have establish
- Page 172 and 173:
Results 4.5.3 Identified associatio
- Page 174 and 175:
Results central line managers in pr
- Page 176 and 177:
Results Table 20 Summary of the ide
- Page 178 and 179:
Results Like task coordinating acti
- Page 180 and 181:
Results The characteristics of the
- Page 182 and 183:
Results authority, but he gradually
- Page 184 and 185:
Results Regarding the third case, t
- Page 186 and 187:
Results happen in this challenging
- Page 188 and 189:
Results program launch the program
- Page 190 and 191:
Results The other two cases, Bureau
- Page 192 and 193:
Discussion hand, in time orientatio
- Page 194 and 195:
Discussion To sum up the discussion
- Page 196 and 197:
Discussion and resource seeking has
- Page 198 and 199:
Discussion differ on the amount of
- Page 200 and 201:
Discussion Case Center demonstrated
- Page 202 and 203:
Discussion Previous empirical resea
- Page 204 and 205:
Discussion description responsible
- Page 206 and 207:
Discussion and these representative
- Page 208 and 209:
Discussion achieving the required l
- Page 210 and 211:
Discussion 2009; Blomquist & Mülle
- Page 212 and 213:
198 Discussion program initiation a
- Page 214 and 215:
Discussion 5.2.3 Program autonomy a
- Page 216 and 217:
Discussion may even be portrayed as
- Page 218 and 219:
Discussion presented by Ericksen an
- Page 220 and 221:
Discussion a legitimate position, a
- Page 222 and 223:
Discussion internal validity, espec
- Page 224 and 225:
Conclusion 6. Conclusion In this ch
- Page 226 and 227:
Conclusion Finally, in line with re
- Page 228 and 229:
Conclusion provided indications of
- Page 230 and 231:
References References Aaltio-Marjos
- Page 232 and 233:
218 References Balogun, J. 2003. Fr
- Page 234 and 235:
References Cacciatori, E. 2008. Mem
- Page 236 and 237:
References Dunphy, D. 1996. Organiz
- Page 238 and 239:
224 References Glueck, W. F. 1969.
- Page 240 and 241:
References Jensen, C., Johansson, S
- Page 242 and 243:
References Lehtonen, P. 2007. The e
- Page 244 and 245:
References Mealia, L. W. 1978. Lear
- Page 246 and 247:
References Parker, R., & Bradley, L
- Page 248 and 249:
234 References Sashkin M., & Burke,
- Page 250 and 251:
References Thompson, J. D. 1967. Or
- Page 252 and 253:
Appendices Appendices Appendix 1: I
- Page 254 and 255:
Appendices Interview outline: case
- Page 256 and 257:
Appendices Interview outline: case
- Page 258 and 259:
Appendices Interview outline: case
- Page 260 and 261:
Appendices Appendix 2: Code framewo
- Page 262 and 263:
Boundary type Overall view in case
- Page 264 and 265:
Boundary type Overall view in case
- Page 266 and 267:
Boundary aspect Temporal Most progr
- Page 268 and 269:
Categories and types of boundary ac
- Page 270 and 271:
Categories and types of boundary ac
- Page 272 and 273:
Categories and types of boundary ac
- Page 274 and 275:
Indicators of readiness for change
- Page 276 and 277:
Indicators of readiness for change
- Page 278:
Indicators of readiness for change