02.07.2015 Views

Boundary activities and readiness for ... - Projekti-Instituutti

Boundary activities and readiness for ... - Projekti-Instituutti

Boundary activities and readiness for ... - Projekti-Instituutti

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Research methodology <strong>and</strong> data<br />

program core team members’ boundary <strong>activities</strong>, leaving the programrelated<br />

actions of outsiders out of the analysis (except when these had<br />

triggered core team members’ boundary <strong>activities</strong>). Other principles<br />

concerned the focus, nature, timing, <strong>and</strong> target of the <strong>activities</strong>. Table 11<br />

describes the principles that were used in determining whether the<br />

identified <strong>activities</strong> were interpreted as boundary <strong>activities</strong>.<br />

Table 11 Principles <strong>for</strong> identifying boundary <strong>activities</strong> during the analysis<br />

Principle<br />

Focus on the programparent<br />

organization<br />

boundary<br />

Focus on human action<br />

Program core team<br />

member(s) as actor(s)<br />

Target of the activity<br />

within the parent<br />

organization<br />

Timing of the activity<br />

Description<br />

The activity must somehow address the boundary between the<br />

program <strong>and</strong> its parent organization, either by defining,<br />

crossing or blocking the boundary. The program’s internal<br />

<strong>activities</strong> that do not address the boundary are not included in<br />

the analysis.<br />

The activity needs to directly refer to human action.<br />

(Example: mentioning the existence of a <strong>for</strong>mal integration<br />

mechanism such as a reward system or a decision making<br />

process is not interpreted as a boundary activity. However,<br />

creating those mechanisms in the negotiations between the<br />

parties or utilizing those mechanisms by communicating across<br />

the boundary may be counted as a boundary activity, if other<br />

conditions apply.)<br />

The activity must be per<strong>for</strong>med by a representative of the<br />

program organization. Still, the activity may be triggered by<br />

the actions of those representing the parent organization.<br />

(Example: if a certain group in the parent organization is<br />

actively lobbying against the program, this is not interpreted as<br />

a boundary activity. However, the counteractions of the key<br />

program actors, such as negotiations <strong>and</strong> communications<br />

between that group <strong>and</strong> the program’s key actors may be<br />

counted as boundary <strong>activities</strong>, if other conditions apply.)<br />

The activity needs to be directed at those representing the<br />

parent organization. Extra-organizational boundary <strong>activities</strong><br />

that cross the parent organization’s boundaries, such as<br />

communication <strong>and</strong> cooperation with external consultants or<br />

suppliers, are not included in the analysis, unless they<br />

simultaneously concern those within the parent organization.<br />

The activity must occur during program initiation. The<br />

duration of the initiation stage was defined case-specifically<br />

during the first phase of the analysis (see section 4.1 <strong>for</strong> these<br />

definitions).<br />

When going through the interview data, every time when an excerpt was<br />

identified in the interview transcripts that fulfilled the defined criteria <strong>for</strong> a<br />

boundary activity, the quotation was recorded as a boundary activity <strong>and</strong> it<br />

was connected to the code representing the corresponding boundary<br />

activity type. If a corresponding code did not yet exist, a new code was<br />

created or an existing code was extended <strong>and</strong> relabeled to include the newly<br />

identified activity type. It became apparent during the early days of the<br />

analysis that many <strong>activities</strong> described by the in<strong>for</strong>mants were not related<br />

to just one type of boundary activity, but simultaneously represented two<br />

94

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!